This forum

I've read a few posts saying "I barely come on here anymore." "This forum is shit" "This forum is going downhill"

First of all, it's a forum and nothing has changed. Secondly, people ask for stricter mods but when someone is banned they want more lenient mods. So it's a lose/lose.

If you're not happy posting on this forum, then don't.

lets be honest, unlike me, most people on this forum have no social life and have no friends in real life

they will say they will not come on here anymore but they always come running back when they discover their existence in the real world is insignificant

this forum is a place where uneasy souls can rest and socialize

this forum is brilliance

Sprocket = GONE.

everybody should model themselves on me...

right Mal?

Mal wrote:I've read a few posts saying "I barely come on here anymore." "This forum is shit" "This forum is going downhill"

First of all, it's a forum and nothing has changed. Secondly, people ask for stricter mods but when someone is banned they want more lenient mods. So it's a lose/lose.

If you're not happy posting on this forum, then don't.

The ones who wanted stricter mods are idiots, i've always complained about the inconsistency and clear bias from mods.

No one's biased. You can fuck off with our little theories, James. You get away with more than many.

James has a perfect point.

People wanted stricter mods against the shite trolls who contribute nothing but trying to wind people up all day.

Playmakers interpretation = Yeah we'll be stricter let's ban Forrest and James who actually contribute but do have the tendency to wum.


People just want a fair forum, but there are clearly untouchables.

I'd like to know who's untouchable...

I'm not going to name names.

But can I just clear one thing up with you?

If a post is followed by, "This is my unbiased opinion" does that mean that it can not be classed as trolling?

I'll name one person straight off. Grenade. He constantly spams them stupids pics.

What happened to no .gifs in signatures? Many people have them.

Then there is the posters that post thousands of pointless posts followed by a smiley. Yet these aren't taken action against because they keep the forum statistics up.


PS: This is my unbiased opinion.

James wrote:I'll name one person straight off. Grenade. He constantly spams them stupids pics.

What happened to no .gifs in signatures? Many people have them.

Then there is the posters that post thousands of pointless posts followed by a smiley. Yet these aren't taken action against because they keep the forum statistics up.


PS: This is my unbiased opinion.

There is no gifs in signatures, I just haven't got round to removing people's.

There's no rule against what you must have in a post for it to be valid.

Grenade barely gets reported so why should he be banned?

Mal wrote:

James wrote:I'll name one person straight off. Grenade. He constantly spams them stupids pics.

What happened to no .gifs in signatures? Many people have them.

Then there is the posters that post thousands of pointless posts followed by a smiley. Yet these aren't taken action against because they keep the forum statistics up.


PS: This is my unbiased opinion.

There is no gifs in signatures, I just haven't got round to removing people's.

There's no rule against what you must have in a post for it to be valid.

Grenade barely gets reported so why should he be banned?

I reported him a bunch of times for replying to all of my posts (which eventually got locked because of him) and Chris just said "I do the same so why should I warn him?" I do report, just your muppet decided not to take action.

And tell me, what's worse? Posting that Arsenal are a mid table team or posting random pics after somebody posts? I can tell you which one is more constructive and i'm sure you aren't that stupid either.

It's just the internet man.

Why so serious James ?

If a mod tells me to stop it then I will but the last time I checked it wasn't against the rules to post pictures. If they're "spam" to you then I would recommend that you put me on your ignore list.

Oh, have you turned constructive now muppet boy has ran off with his steroids to a new forum?

Not only that, what about the homophobic slurs too.

Meme's are not spam. Unless they are posted one after the other.

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t9084-marouane-chamakh-v-theo-walcott-as-a-striker

Acceptable?

Mal wrote:No one's biased. You can fuck off with our little theories, James. You get away with more than many.

No, there is clear bias in favour of Arsenal, there's no doubt about that. I have been infracted twice in the last month or so for supposedly winding up Arsenal fans, but it was certainly no worse than what the Liverpool fans use to wind up Man Utd fans.

James wrote:Oh, have you turned constructive now muppet boy has ran off with his steroids to a new forum?

LULWUT

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Mal wrote:No one's biased. You can fuck off with our little theories, James. You get away with more than many.

No, there is clear bias in favour of Arsenal, there's no doubt about that. I have been infracted twice in the last month or so for supposedly winding up Arsenal fans, but it was certainly no worse than what the Liverpool fans use to wind up Man Utd fans.

I'm the only Arsenal mod right now but there's a clear bias.

Mal wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

No, there is clear bias in favour of Arsenal, there's no doubt about that. I have been infracted twice in the last month or so for supposedly winding up Arsenal fans, but it was certainly no worse than what the Liverpool fans use to wind up Man Utd fans.

I'm the only Arsenal mod right now but there's a clear bias.

I thought you had given up your duties

Anyway, there has been a clear bias in favour of Arsenal since the inception of the forum, particularly recently. For reasons I wouldn't like to speculate on because you might ban innocent people to try and punish me, there has been a softening in your stance. I give you credit for that, it's a shame you refuse to give me credit.

I called myself a mod not an admin. Also, I didn't 'give up my duties'. I said Royal can take control.

I'd like to know how there's Arsenal bias from mods who don't support Arsenal?

James wrote:http://www.the-playmaker.com/t9084-marouane-chamakh-v-theo-walcott-as-a-striker

Acceptable?

Are you fucking serious

RR:

Level 1 / Using 'spaz' / 19th May 2011 / blackskar EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting and calling Liverpool fans 'spastics' / 19th May 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting / 24th May 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
__________________________________________________________
Level 2/ Racism / June 8 2011 / Rei Andros
Level 1/ Spamming / July 5 2011 / Royal

Arsenal bias.

Mal wrote:I called myself a mod not an admin. Also, I didn't 'give up my duties'. I said Royal can take control.

I'd like to know how there's Arsenal bias from mods who don't support Arsenal?

As I say, there's been a softening in the stance. I thought the banning of Forest permanently was a perfect example of this bias.

A) You are an Arsenal fan and you are the autocratic ruler of the forum
B) Historically there have been many Arsenal fans on this forum, more than other clubs.

James:

Level 2 / Baiting / 14th May 2011 / Royal
Level 1 / Off topic threads / 14th May 2011 / Royal
Level 1 / Personal insult / 15th May 2011 / Ché Guayaba
Level 1 / Spam thread / 28th May 2011 / Zzonked
________________________________________________________

5 day ban served, infractions cleared (Don't delete)
________________________________________________________

Level 1 / Personal insult / 5th June 2011 / Marvin EXPIRED
Level 1 / Personal insult / 9th July 2011 / ayvee1 EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting thread / 12th July 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 1 / Troll thread / 12th July 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 1 / Troll thread / 12th July 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 3 / Personal Insults / 27th July 2011 / Marvin EXPIRED

Again, a huge Arsenal bias.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Mal wrote:I called myself a mod not an admin. Also, I didn't 'give up my duties'. I said Royal can take control.

I'd like to know how there's Arsenal bias from mods who don't support Arsenal?

As I say, there's been a softening in the stance. I thought the banning of Forest permanently was a perfect example of this bias.

A) You are an Arsenal fan and you are the autocratic ruler of the forum
B) Historically there have been many Arsenal fans on this forum, more than other clubs.

So this forum is biased towards Arsenal because an admin supports them? We might as well say we have a Burnley bias too.

There's also more Liverpool fans than any other on here.

Mal wrote:RR:

Level 1 / Using 'spaz' / 19th May 2011 / blackskar EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting and calling Liverpool fans 'spastics' / 19th May 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting / 24th May 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
__________________________________________________________
Level 2/ Racism / June 8 2011 / Rei Andros
Level 1/ Spamming / July 5 2011 / Royal

Arsenal bias.

If you don't tell me that my infractions have been revoked, how the fuck am I supposed to know they have been revoked? Chris, your friend who you appointed as moderator, gave me 4 infraction points before I took him down for 'Being a cunt', among other things.

Another thing, unban poor Mutant123, he was only looking to do what is best for the forum.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

Mal wrote:RR:

Level 1 / Using 'spaz' / 19th May 2011 / blackskar EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting and calling Liverpool fans 'spastics' / 19th May 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
Level 1 / Baiting / 24th May 2011 / Zzonked EXPIRED
__________________________________________________________
Level 2/ Racism / June 8 2011 / Rei Andros
Level 1/ Spamming / July 5 2011 / Royal

Arsenal bias.

If you don't tell me that my infractions have been revoked, how the fuck am I supposed to know they have been revoked? Chris, your friend who you appointed as moderator, gave me 4 infraction points before I took him down for 'Being a cunt', among other things.

Another thing, unban poor Mutant123, he was only looking to do what is best for the forum.

Chris was removed as mod so his infractions are invalid. Mutant123 is banned and is staying banned.

Mal wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

As I say, there's been a softening in the stance. I thought the banning of Forest permanently was a perfect example of this bias.

A) You are an Arsenal fan and you are the autocratic ruler of the forum
B) Historically there have been many Arsenal fans on this forum, more than other clubs.

So this forum is biased towards Arsenal because an admin supports them? We might as well say we have a Burnley bias too.

There's also more Liverpool fans than any other on here.

No-one gives a fuck about Burnley. The point I am making is that you saying 'No Arsenal bias because there aren't any Arsenal mods' is nonsense, because you are the self appointed dictator.

And I meant Arsenal mods, slip of the mind. Not a coincidence that they share an affiliation with you though.