Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:He hasn't played in months because he's not good enough
16 subs towards the end of the games.. you just made yourself look so so stupid
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:He hasn't played in months because he's not good enough
B0dunrin wrote:Chamakh?
1 goal since November, quality player.
luke. wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:B0dunrin wrote:Chamakh?
1 goal since November, quality player.
He doesn't get a game.
Wonder why...
And he does usually, and he's shite.
luke. wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Johnny wrote:That's in the league, 41 overall.
He hasn't played in months.
He came on vs Bolton, Blackburn, West Ham, and United in the FA Cup.
Also, doesn't the fact he hasn't started since Leyton Orient tell you something about his quality?
luke. wrote:The latest he has been subbed on is the 86th minute, in a 3-0 win vs Wigan on Jan 22nd.
Second latest is 80, then a whole load of 70-76's, with some 60's etc.
So he doesn't come on that late.
luke. wrote:The latest he has been subbed on is the 86th minute, in a 3-0 win vs Wigan on Jan 22nd.
Second latest is 80, then a whole load of 70-76's, with some 60's etc.
So he doesn't come on that late.
By the way, what were you reading to think he hadn't played 41 times this season?Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Johnny wrote:So...?
He can't have made 41 appearances this season.
You are reading wiki.
luke. wrote:He's missed so many chances that could have won you games though. Not great by any stretch.
Wouldn't say he's class, he's quite a good player though imo.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Don't really give a fuck. Chamakh is class.
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Don't really give a fuck. Chamakh is class.
arsenalap11 wrote:luke. wrote:He's missed so many chances that could have won you games though. Not great by any stretch.
Find some examples then please. I remember a few that he's missed, but not 'so many'. Also, no he's not great, but he's a good player to have and has done well in his first season in England.
arsenalap11 wrote:Aye he's missed a few yes, but he hasn't missed loads that have cost us games.
luke. wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Don't really give a fuck. Chamakh is class.arsenalap11 wrote:luke. wrote:He's missed so many chances that could have won you games though. Not great by any stretch.
Find some examples then please. I remember a few that he's missed, but not 'so many'. Also, no he's not great, but he's a good player to have and has done well in his first season in England.
In pretty much all of the games you have drawn recently he's came on and wasted some easy chances. You know what I'm talking about.
Pilkz wrote:Didn't Arsene want him for ages but now he has him he doesn't even play him?
ViVaRooney wrote:Flops
Chicarito
Odenwigiwigiwigi
Suarez
Success
Torres
Carroll
Dzeko
Jela why can you never admit when you're wrong.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:He hasn't played in months because he's not good enough
Jord wrote:Jela why can you never admit when you're wrong.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:He hasn't played in months because he's not good enough
Fine Shagger wrote:Chamakh NOT a success
van der Vaart also NOT a success
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Jord wrote:Jela why can you never admit when you're wrong.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:He hasn't played in months because he's not good enough
What? Chamakh is a top class striker.
ViVaRooney wrote:Fine Shagger wrote:Chamakh NOT a success
van der Vaart also NOT a success
VDV is a success.. especially for the price
just not as big a success as some suggest
Fonseca wrote:Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Jord wrote:Jela why can you never admit when you're wrong.Jelavic18|RFC wrote:Fonseca wrote:He hasn't played in months because he's not good enough
What? Chamakh is a top class striker.
You didn't even know who he was in france
|
|