Chelsea v Manchester United|Champions league|6/4/11|KO 7:45

kyro7 wrote:Lol Chelsea fans care more about Torres than their football club.

kyro7 wrote:Lol Chelsea fans care more about Torres than their football club.

luke. wrote:He didn't dive. Just got his feet caught. But It wasn't a penalty.

Sean wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Lol Chelsea fans care more about Torres than their football club.

Really, where did you pull that one from then?

Fanatic wrote:There was contact with the front of his body as well as him getting tangled up with his own feet. No penalty and not a dive.

Fanatic wrote:

Dean wrote:

Fanatic wrote:Torres never dived but it wasn't a penalty.

He did dive. There was contact, but that contact didn't take him to the floor, if you notice, contact is made and then he flings himself to the floor, how the fucks that not a dive? If it's not a dive, then what is it?

There was contact with the front of his body as well as him getting tangled up with his own feet. No penalty and not a dive.

Fanatic wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

blackskar wrote:Fergie does talk some shite:

The lad made the most of it

He did say he hadn't seen it back though, so don't shit your pants.

If he hasn't seen it, how does he know he made the most of it
?

He said it looked like he made the most of it.

How can it "look like" if he hasn't seen it.

Dean wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Dean wrote:

Fanatic wrote:Torres never dived but it wasn't a penalty.

He did dive. There was contact, but that contact didn't take him to the floor, if you notice, contact is made and then he flings himself to the floor, how the fucks that not a dive? If it's not a dive, then what is it?

There was contact with the front of his body as well as him getting tangled up with his own feet. No penalty and not a dive.

He was looking for a penalty Fanatic, the CONTACT DID NOT MAKE HIM GO TO THE GROUND, you can clearly see that in the physics of his body, he then after realising contact was made, thought I'll try and get a penalty, he then flung his body to the ground. If the contact didn't take him to the ground, then what else did? He feel to the floor on his own accord and was looking for a penalty, that's a dive mate.

moscowmadeit3 wrote:The first penalty incident was a penalty but you can see why the ref didn't give it. Yes he was right in line with it but when Evra goes into the tackle you see the ball change direction, which the ref might have thought Evra touched it.

As they say - It evens itself out across the season(s) and it started today.

Anderson=Class wrote:

moscowmadeit3 wrote:The first penalty incident was a penalty but you can see why the ref didn't give it. Yes he was right in line with it but when Evra goes into the tackle you see the ball change direction, which the ref might have thought Evra touched it.

As they say - It evens itself out across the season(s) and it started today.

It looks like it was outside?

moscowmadeit3 wrote:
Was it even in the box?

Fanatic wrote:Looks like it's on the line.

Fanatic wrote:

Dean wrote:

Fanatic wrote:

Dean wrote:

Fanatic wrote:Torres never dived but it wasn't a penalty.

He did dive. There was contact, but that contact didn't take him to the floor, if you notice, contact is made and then he flings himself to the floor, how the fucks that not a dive? If it's not a dive, then what is it?

There was contact with the front of his body as well as him getting tangled up with his own feet. No penalty and not a dive.

He was looking for a penalty Fanatic, the CONTACT DID NOT MAKE HIM GO TO THE GROUND, you can clearly see that in the physics of his body, he then after realising contact was made, thought I'll try and get a penalty, he then flung his body to the ground. If the contact didn't take him to the ground, then what else did? He feel to the floor on his own accord and was looking for a penalty, that's a dive mate.

I'm going off my photographic memory because I haven't found a replay of it yet but the tangling of his legs leads him to go to ground. I definitely have to see it again.

ViVaRooney wrote:who cares, ref rightfully didnt call foul

luke. wrote:He was inside the box.

Pictures are so dodgy. Videos prove it better.