Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
Ibrahimovic got it worse, moves on the hunt for trophys and his old team get them all
Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
luke. wrote:Scott wrote:luke. wrote:Scott wrote: @ Luke
@ Torres
@ how we beat a fully strength Chelsea side @ Stamford Bridge without Saurez or Carroll.
Just ... ROFL! LMAO! Fuck off you Chelsea rent boys, fuck off Torres, you were shit.
Meireles is just a fucking hero. 4 goals in 4. He's like Cahill for Everton.
YES! Fucking get in.
We weren't exactly full strength.
Lol shut the fuck up, you were.
We're still missing Zhirkov, Benayoun and Alex. Not full strength.
Tom wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
Ibrahimovic got it worse, moves on the hunt for trophys and his old team get them all
Mustangt125 wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
City and Everton rivals?
Tom wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
Ibrahimovic got it worse, moves on the hunt for trophys and his old team get them all
luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
Still made me chuckle.luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
Full strength starting 11?luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
Moorzy2911 wrote:Mustangt125 wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
City and Everton rivals?
Yep, we hate those baby blue twats as much as you hate the Devils.
luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
In that case, Carroll, Cole, Spearing, Suarez being out means that we were fielding an even more weakened team.
NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
In that case, Carroll, Cole, Spearing, Suarez being out means that we were fielding an even more weakened team.
Who would you have put in that starting 11 to make it stronger?luke. wrote:NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
In that case, Carroll, Cole, Spearing, Suarez being out means that we were fielding an even more weakened team.
I never said anything about Liverpool though, just pointing out we weren't 100% full.
Whos your 100% full team? you had everyone available except alexluke. wrote:NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
In that case, Carroll, Cole, Spearing, Suarez being out means that we were fielding an even more weakened team.
I never said anything about Liverpool though, just pointing out we weren't 100% full.
dena wrote:Tom wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
Ibrahimovic got it worse, moves on the hunt for trophys and his old team get them all
How so? Ibra has one like 6 straight league titles or something crazy like that.
kyro7 wrote:Who would you have put in that starting 11 to make it stronger?luke. wrote:NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
In that case, Carroll, Cole, Spearing, Suarez being out means that we were fielding an even more weakened team.
I never said anything about Liverpool though, just pointing out we weren't 100% full.
It's always a love-hate with Arsenal, isn't it.Theeeooo wrote:Only arsenal can fuck up a 4 goal lead and still gain more points than teams around them except city
And now he is off at Milan.Tom wrote:dena wrote:Tom wrote:Moorzy2911 wrote:It's like a Carbon copy of Lescott.
Fuck off to your rival team and become a shithouse.
Malouda was unlucky not to start over Torres.
Ibrahimovic got it worse, moves on the hunt for trophys and his old team get them all
How so? Ibra has one like 6 straight league titles or something crazy like that.
The champions league is the biggest trophy he can realistically win, he's never going to win the world cup. When he looks back at his career he'll feel like a loser compared to the worlds greats. Only Barca were going to pay that fee so of course he had to take his chances and it fucked up
LiamB_30 wrote:To be fair, Chelsea would have been stronger if they started without Torres and with Malouda. A system they recognise and has been successful. Torres should have been kept to start in a "less significant" game.
That wouldnt of won you the game.luke. wrote:kyro7 wrote:Who would you have put in that starting 11 to make it stronger?luke. wrote:NGreat wrote:luke. wrote:We weren't full strength though.. no matter who the players were. Not that funny.
In that case, Carroll, Cole, Spearing, Suarez being out means that we were fielding an even more weakened team.
I never said anything about Liverpool though, just pointing out we weren't 100% full.
Alex > Ivanovic. Zhirkov and Benayoun are useful options from the bench too.
LiamB_30 wrote: Berbatov will always be 10 times the player Torres is, Torres has such limited ability it is beyond belief he cost 50m.
Yes, Liverpool parked the bus, and it's very irritating when inferior teams do this, but Chelsea lost their discipline to let Liverpool score an easy goal.
No chance for Chelsea to win the league, no chance for Liverpool top 4.
Perfect
Not the real oneluke. wrote:LiamB_30 wrote:To be fair, Chelsea would have been stronger if they started without Torres and with Malouda. A system they recognise and has been successful. Torres should have been kept to start in a "less significant" game.
Liam actually made a sensible post