luke. wrote:Just for your info - I'd rather we got Aguero then Torres, more complete and younger.
Just throwing that out there.
He's not a better centre forward though or a better goalscorer.
luke. wrote:Just for your info - I'd rather we got Aguero then Torres, more complete and younger.
Just throwing that out there.
Scott wrote:luke. wrote:Just for your info - I'd rather we got Aguero then Torres, more complete and younger.
Just throwing that out there.
Yeah right, if you got Torres, and he continued his amazing goal scoring record for you lot, you'd be creaming over him. And saying he's the best in the world. Even though you don't think he is right now.
JK wrote:Suarez doesn't even know if he's going to Liverpool yet. He told the press the clubs have to call him first, then he'll believe it.
luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Suarez will though.Plan D wrote:Anyways it doesn't matter Luke, 'cos Nando won't be playing for Chelsea so theres no point having a discussion about it. Messi wouldn't suit Liverpools system for that matter.
Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
That wasn't my point.. why spend 40m for a player who might end up just coming on after 60 mins and being injured most of the time?
luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
That wasn't my point.. why spend 40m for a player who might end up just coming on after 60 mins and being injured most of the time?
Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
That wasn't my point.. why spend 40m for a player who might end up just coming on after 60 mins and being injured most of the time?
What?
£40m? I think you'll find that offer has been turned down already son.
Scott wrote:luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
That wasn't my point.. why spend 40m for a player who might end up just coming on after 60 mins and being injured most of the time?
Stop trolling. Torres has been playing constantly now, with no injuries. The FULL 90 mins.
Scott wrote:You said he's constantly injured. He isn't, he just had a long term problem with his knee, and is finally recovered from it.
Yes, he has.Scott wrote:luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
That wasn't my point.. why spend 40m for a player who might end up just coming on after 60 mins and being injured most of the time?
Stop trolling. Torres has been playing constantly now, with no injuries. The FULL 90 mins.
luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Saurez would eat Hernandez.Fanatic wrote:Man UTD fans on Suarez: "Just to throw this in there. He's not as good as Hernandez"
"I basically wouldn't be the least thrilled if United are the ones signing him
Good to see the UTD fans on here aint as bad as them idiots
Jamie wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Aguero doesn't play on the wing.
I think Luke meant more as an inside role with space to work with on the wing.Jamie wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Aguero doesn't play on the wing.
luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Aguero would fit better. Aguero would be perfect for our RW position.
Torres wouldn't put Drogba out of the central spot.. and he can't play on the wing.. so it's a pretty dumb move.
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
That wasn't my point.. why spend 40m for a player who might end up just coming on after 60 mins and being injured most of the time?
What?
£40m? I think you'll find that offer has been turned down already son.
Oh dear.. That's why I said why spend 40m.. because that's what we offered.
Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:luke. wrote:Plan D wrote:
Yeah ofcourse it's a dumb move, I mean who would try to sign one of the worlds best strikers? Ridiculous move I agree.
That wasn't my point.. why spend 40m for a player who might end up just coming on after 60 mins and being injured most of the time?
What?
£40m? I think you'll find that offer has been turned down already son.
Oh dear.. That's why I said why spend 40m.. because that's what we offered.
IF Torres somehow dramtically ended up at Chelsea (Which won't happen anyway, I'm being hypothetical) He'd be a starter every single for Chelsea, why are Chelsea gunna pay upwards of £70-100m for a player to sit on the bench?
Now you're just being stupid Luke.