+15
Fanatic
dena
Jamie
luke.
The Zlatan
Lux
Scouser_Dave
Dean
Childish Logic
Jord
Carlos Jenkinson
Kuled
North_Sea_Tiger
Torresxvilla
Cadbury
19 posters
Luis Suarez to Liverpool?
The Zlatan-
- Posts : 10347
Guest- Guest
Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Not happening.
Kuled-
- Posts : 55235
Age : 28
good prediction.Kuled wrote:I have a feeling he'll go to France.
Dean-
- Posts : 9761
Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Not happening.
Konchesky and Poulsen were also great buys..
They weren't though.
Guest- Guest
Scott wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Not happening.
And Joe Cole is proving he is world class as well..
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 30
Location : Belfast
The funniest thing about this thread is polska's Arsenal licking.
Guest- Guest
Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Not happening.
Konchesky and Poulsen were also great buys..
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Guest- Guest
Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Not happening.
Konchesky and Poulsen were also great buys..
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Carlos Jenkinson-
- Posts : 10964
luke. wrote:The funniest thing about this thread is polska's Arsenal licking.
so?
Dean-
- Posts : 9761
Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Not happening.
Konchesky and Poulsen were also great buys..
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Guest- Guest
this will never happen, dream on losers
Guest- Guest
ViVaRooney wrote:this will never happen, dream on losers
And Liverpool will never win the league again, and Daglish will turn Liverpool into the next Newcastle and get relegated.
Guest- Guest
Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:
Konchesky and Poulsen were also great buys..
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
Guest- Guest
Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:
Konchesky and Poulsen were also great buys..
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
Please this not to be true.
If I remember Dan, you had a wankfest on Ea fourms about Konc, with that Konch gif.
Guest- Guest
Mr Leiva wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
Please this not to be true.
If I remember Dan, you had a wankfest on Ea fourms about Konc, with that Konch gif.
That was NGreat. I never wanted Konchesky.
Dean-
- Posts : 9761
Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:
Konchesky and Poulsen were also great buys..
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
luke.-
- Posts : 32310
Age : 30
Location : Belfast
Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
You just brought up the past.
Way to backtrack and be a hypocrite.
Liverpool fans in general also like bringing up the past, what's that you say about Chelsea all the time? Oh yeah, we have no history, history is in the past isn't it? So you must bring up the past quite a lot, so really there's no difference.
Guest- Guest
Dan wrote:Mr Leiva wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
Please this not to be true.
If I remember Dan, you had a wankfest on Ea fourms about Konc, with that Konch gif.
That was NGreat. I never wanted Konchesky.
My memory must be fading.
Guest- Guest
You just brought up him saying Suarez wouldn't happen, and he's done the same to you about something now you're back tracking. lol.Dean wrote:So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
Jamie-
- Posts : 24047
Age : 63
Location : Thiago
Supports : That Catalan club
kyro7 wrote:You just brought up him saying Suarez wouldn't happen, and he's done the same to you about something now you're back tracking. lol.Dean wrote:So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
Guest- Guest
Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:
They weren't though.
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
I don't think he intentionality went out to make you look like a tool. Just a bit of banter, with a something you got wrong. And to be honest, you don't get many things wrong.
dena-
- Posts : 18688
Age : 35
Location : only place to find base heads and hot women
kyro7 wrote:You just brought up him saying Suarez wouldn't happen, and he's done the same to you about something now you're back tracking. lol.Dean wrote:So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
Guest- Guest
He said Torres would stay. Then he said Reina would go ... 
Guest- Guest
Yep, won't go out to make someone look a tool eh?
My point with that post was to prove you get things wrong too.
I'll happily admit I'm wrong, ask any other Liverpool fan on this place.
Class clown out.
Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Not happening.
My point with that post was to prove you get things wrong too.
I'll happily admit I'm wrong, ask any other Liverpool fan on this place.
Class clown out.
Guest- Guest
Scott wrote:He said Torres would stay. Then he said Reina would go ...
Me?
Dean-
- Posts : 9761
luke. wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:Dan wrote:
Funny, because I seem to remember you telling me that Konchesky's 'PL experience' would lead him to be a good player and telling Jamie that Poulsen wasn't crap.
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
You just brought up the past.
Way to backtrack and be a hypocrite.
Liverpool fans in general also like bringing up the past, what's that you say about Chelsea all the time? Oh yeah, we have no history, history is in the past isn't it? So you must bring up the past quite a lot, so really there's no difference.
Eh? I made a joke about it and put a smiley tongue in cheek. Dan went out of his way to go and find a post I done months and months ago to try and make me look like a tool. In fact I even acknowledged what Dan said by saying 'Yeah, good one.'
And we're talking completely different terms here, I'm talking about bring up the past when people say things etc... and you're comparing that to Liverpool fans bringing up past in footballing terms.
My lord. And this is exactly the reason I don't come on here much any more, people are just pricks with no understanding.
Guest- Guest
Fuck off then.Dean wrote:My lord. And this is exactly the reason I don't come on here much any more, people are just pricks with no understanding.
Dean-
- Posts : 9761
kyro7 wrote:You just brought up him saying Suarez wouldn't happen, and he's done the same to you about something now you're back tracking. lol.Dean wrote:So, you want a medal? Again, like Jamie, love bringing up the past. You've made a few in your time Dan, difference is I won't go out of my way to make you look like a tool. You would, that's the difference between me and you.
Dean-
- Posts : 9761
kyro7 wrote:Fuck off then.Dean wrote:My lord. And this is exactly the reason I don't come on here much any more, people are just pricks with no understanding.
No, because thankfully, there are still some decent posters on the forum. You aren't one of them. Well you are, but some days you just do my head in, other days I think you're a decent guy.
