Mr Leiva wrote:Dan wrote:Mr Leiva wrote:Dan wrote:Dean wrote:
Yeah, good one.
Oh, so it's not true then?
'With Konchesky we get a decent left back with good experience of the premiership! he doesn't need to settle cos he's english and understands Roy's methods.
He's better than insua going forward and better than Aurelio at defending (that's why Aurelio hasn't been picked I think) which is what we need badly (he looked good against Man Utd aswell) and also knows Roy's system... plus he'll be hungry to prove himself at a big club.
All in all he'll do for the few seasons he has left in him and he isn't a long term option anyway, its all good and well talking about the future but if we don't get our lalala's into gear now there ain't gunna be a F***king future. '
'1.) He's English.
2.) He's been a constant, consistent performer in the Premier League and would not need time to adapt and settle in.
3.) He's worked under Hodgson before.'
'Got to disagree there mate, Konchesky is a better left back than Insua all day long and in '' some '' aspects is better than Aurelio. I don't think its as bad as everyones making out, he's a good hard working left back whos a very solid defender and can get forward if allowed to, ive a feeling he's gunna slot straight in at left back actually, I don't think he'll play second fiddle, my moneys on him being first choice left back for us.'
All credited to one The-Afternoon's-Hat..
Please this not to be true.
If I remember Dan, you had a wankfest on Ea fourms about Konc, with that Konch gif.
That was NGreat. I never wanted Konchesky.
My memory must be fading.
What the fuck are you on about?
