Chat Thread

Zzonked wrote:I want to donate sperm. You get £35 per wank and I really want to raise an army of small Zzonked's that I don't need to look after. 

Main problem is I think my dads side has a history of heart problems. Fuck you dad, your heart better not stop me impregnating strangers!

But think of the no fap life

Scott M wrote:Decided to check out Breaking Bad, due to all the hype. Subscribed to Netflix 1 month free trial. Watching the Pilot episode tonight.

I thought the first season was good but got bored halfway through the second. Don't understand the hype.

From what I've heard, the fourth is the best.

Zzonked wrote:I want to donate sperm. You get £35 per wank and I really want to raise an army of small Zzonked's that I don't need to look after. 

Main problem is I think my dads side has a history of heart problems. Fuck you dad, your heart better not stop me impregnating strangers!

I'd have your kids John

The seasons just got worse and worse imho opinion. Walter used to be a sympathetic character, then he just became an intolerable parasite.

Moriarty wrote:The seasons just got worse and worse imho opinion.  Walter used to be a sympathetic character, then he just became an intolerable parasite.

Hmmm, a character developing through the actions and decisions he makes, terrible writing.

Dagbon wrote:

Moriarty wrote:The seasons just got worse and worse imho opinion.  Walter used to be a sympathetic character, then he just became an intolerable parasite.

Hmmm, a character developing through the actions and decisions he makes, terrible writing.

Why would I watch a show with no sympathetic characters?  

Scousers stick together.  

Fuck Paul Scholes.

Moriarty wrote:

Dagbon wrote:Hmmm, a character developing through the actions and decisions he makes, terrible writing.

Why would I watch a show with no sympathetic characters?  

It's well written, has good dialogue and talented actors?

Dagbon wrote:

Moriarty wrote:Why would I watch a show with no sympathetic characters?  

It's well written, has good dialogue and talented actors?

I have better alternatives with those qualities + sympathetic characters.  

Moriarty wrote:

Scousers stick together.  

I really respect Neville for being as unbiased as he is. Wonderful pundit.

That was a pretty bad debate on the whole, bar a few moments. It was basically just this back and forth:

"Look mate, Paul is the best player I've ever played with. We always won if we had him on our team in training."

"What you on about, mate? He didn't score enough goals like Stevie."

"He may not have scored goals, but he was the man that made things tick."

"But where are the goals, mate?"

No shit. At least Neville acknowledges they're all great players who offer their respective team different things, while Carragher just judges them on matches won by their goals.

Shelvey was responsible for all four goals?

SBSP wrote:Shelvey was responsible for all four goals?

Yep  He passed to Sturridge and Moses for their goals, scored one himself and set up Michu's goal.

Moriarty wrote:That was a pretty bad debate on the whole, bar a few moments. It was basically just this back and forth:

"Look mate, Paul is the best player I've ever played with.  We always won if we had him on our team in training."

"What you on about, mate?  He didn't score enough goals like Stevie."

"He may not have scored goals, but he was the man that made things tick."

"But where are the goals, mate?"

It was a bad debate because Neville wasn't even debating, he was stating his opinion. Carragher was trying so hard to bring up points as to why Neville was wrong, Neville just heard Carraghers opinion on the three and said nothing about.

Carragher has been really bad at punditry so far. Having him and Neville together was a massive mistake because he just highlights the big gap in quality between the two. Also, he asks a lot of questions to whom ever he's co-presenting with. I don't known if the producers have told him do that but it makes him look even stupider when he's asking questions like a novice.

Breaking Bad is an odd one

I got bored half way through Season 2 and stopped watching for a year

Then all my new friends at University were all excited for it so I felt I should start watching it again and it is good. But every now and then you get an episode that just seems unnecessary

This isn't really a spoiler but in like season 3 you get an episode where they spend the whole time trying to catch a fly and talking to each other.

Also I don't know if Skylar is attractive or unattractive. Sometimes I think she could do with little Chip inside of her and other times I'm like ew

Zzonked wrote:I want to donate sperm. You get £35 per wank and I really want to raise an army of small Zzonked's that I don't need to look after. 

Main problem is I think my dads side has a history of heart problems. Fuck you dad, your heart better not stop me impregnating strangers!

Wait wait wait wait.

I can get paid to masturbate?!

Jordi wrote:

Zzonked wrote:I want to donate sperm. You get £35 per wank and I really want to raise an army of small Zzonked's that I don't need to look after. 

Main problem is I think my dads side has a history of heart problems. Fuck you dad, your heart better not stop me impregnating strangers!

Wait wait wait wait.

I can get paid to masturbate?!

Wait

you are telling me I can live off £50 food a week and I can get £35 to masturbate

so I can basically live off the cum I release

Chip, is this your 2nd year at University ?

Jordi wrote:

Zzonked wrote:I want to donate sperm. You get £35 per wank and I really want to raise an army of small Zzonked's that I don't need to look after. 

Main problem is I think my dads side has a history of heart problems. Fuck you dad, your heart better not stop me impregnating strangers!

Wait wait wait wait.

I can get paid to masturbate?!

Yes, but I think you have to be a sperm god to be accepted.

Keyser Söze wrote:

Moriarty wrote:That was a pretty bad debate on the whole, bar a few moments. It was basically just this back and forth:

"Look mate, Paul is the best player I've ever played with.  We always won if we had him on our team in training."

"What you on about, mate?  He didn't score enough goals like Stevie."

"He may not have scored goals, but he was the man that made things tick."

"But where are the goals, mate?"

It was a bad debate because Neville wasn't even debating, he was stating his opinion. Carragher was trying so hard to bring up points as to why Neville was wrong, Neville just heard Carraghers opinion on the three and said nothing about.

Carragher has been really bad at punditry so far. Having him and Neville together was a massive mistake because he just highlights the big gap in quality between the two. Also, he asks a lot of questions to whom ever he's co-presenting with. I don't known if the producers have told him do that but it makes him look even stupider when he's asking questions like a novice.

I agree Neville is far superior, but during analysis Carragher is decent. In opinion situations his rose tinted specs shine through.

I really don't like the combo of Neville and Carragher. I get that it's supposed to be like "oh two old rivals lets have some top lad banta" but it's just uncomfortable.

In 6 months time, it'll just be "normal". No-one likes change.

Zzonked wrote:I really don't like the combo of Neville and Carragher. I get that it's supposed to be like "oh two old rivals lets have some top lad banta" but it's just uncomfortable.

I think it's fascinating. The whole old rivals adds a whole new level to the #bantz. It's interesting to see the little veiled digs they throw towards each other too. All wrapped up by expect analysis from GNev and passable analysis by Carragheritis.

http://www.reddit.com/r/NevillePunditry

Had GTA 5 for a whole day and it's still there unopened. whatamidoing

Dagbon wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:It was a bad debate because Neville wasn't even debating, he was stating his opinion. Carragher was trying so hard to bring up points as to why Neville was wrong, Neville just heard Carraghers opinion on the three and said nothing about.

Carragher has been really bad at punditry so far. Having him and Neville together was a massive mistake because he just highlights the big gap in quality between the two. Also, he asks a lot of questions to whom ever he's co-presenting with. I don't known if the producers have told him do that but it makes him look even stupider when he's asking questions like a novice.

I agree Neville is far superior, but during analysis Carragher is decent. In opinion situations his rose tinted specs shine through.

I agree that Carragher occasionally does some alright analysis but its the way you say things as much as what you say. And I'm not even talking about his accent.

Chip wrote:Breaking Bad is an odd one

I got bored half way through Season 2 and stopped watching for a year

Same happened to me

Season was with Tuco , right ? I thought that was a pretty good storyline.