England vs Belgium Match Thread | 5:15pm |

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:Representative it probably is not. However, when we have to suffer such an unpleasant experience at the hands of the Turkish fans it rather taints your outlook. The only thing they could do to please me would be sentence the cunt who did it to a proper stretch inside for double murder but we all know that will never happen.

Tainting your view is completely understandable, I think it would be more polite if you take into account the fact that you are biased before talking to Turkish people and telling them you don't like the Turkish.

I am more than happy to admit that.


I will also add a further viewpoint on the Turkish for extra clarification. The groups of young Turkish males who hang out in the nightclubs here, forcing themselves on girls who say no repeatedly. They don't take no for an answer and carry on acting slimy and forcing themselves onto girls, it makes me sick. Many times I've seen it end in violence.


Again, I'm sure this is an unfair representation of all Turkish people, but it's reasonable to say that my experiences with them have been unsavoury.

Paulinho wrote:Chamberlain>Hazard

Hazard choked .

Ox was terrible.

iSamuel wrote:

Paulinho wrote:Chamberlain>Hazard

Hazard choked .

Ox was terrible.

Do you have eyes or a pair of boiled eggs embedded in your skull? He was our best player definitely.

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:

iSamuel wrote:

Ox was terrible.

Do you have eyes or a pair of boiled eggs embedded in your skull? He was our best player definitely.

I think Ashley Young was our best player (again).

The Ox didn't play amazingly, but he had occasional bursts of direct wing play that seemed to invigorate the crowd and the team.

Didn't play very well, but that is two wins against decent opposition and we have looked quite solid. We are not going to pull up any trees but if we keep things solid we have a good chance of making the quarter finals and that ain't bad at all.

If anyone heard Walcott's interview after the game he basically said his tactics is to defend and keep it tight, playing on the counter when we get the ball. But, Belgium were a very good side, sharper..more accurate and had the ability to keep the ball for large periods.

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:

iSamuel wrote:

Ox was terrible.

Do you have eyes or a pair of boiled eggs embedded in your skull? He was our best player definitely.

He's not going to start against France, if his performance yesterday was anything to go off. Cole was the best player on the pitch for England.

See the statistic above, Hazard > Young for those who think he was shit.

Edit: There's another stat which states that Hazard doubled the number of chances created by the whole England team.

Hazard had over 70 passes and didn't make a single assist, Young had only 7 and he managed to make a difference. How anyone can read that as Hazard being better baffles me.

all hazard did was get the ball and make the easy pass young created a goal...

people really should watch the matches instead of just looking at stats

Those stats show Young was fucking better if anything.

Samuel.

Chelsea fans on here are the best.

Samuel

I'm sorry Sean.

Uncle John from Jamaica wrote:
I will also add a further viewpoint on the Turkish for extra clarification. The groups of young Turkish males who hang out in the nightclubs here, forcing themselves on girls who say no repeatedly. They don't take no for an answer and carry on acting slimy and forcing themselves onto girls, it makes me sick. Many times I've seen it end in violence.

Well then all Turkish people must be pricks. Turkey should be nuked.

I came here to say

Samuel

But saw other people already said it so I didn't want to look like a bandwagoner.
#truestory

You are a 'bandwagoner', so there's no harm.

Oh, here's the actual stat.

Hazard created twice as many chances as the whole England team were able to put together yesterday. Either 8 or 10. OptaJoe on Twitter posted it last night.

Now try and tell me Young is better than Hazard.

iSamuel wrote:Oh, here's the actual stat.

Hazard created twice as many chances as the whole England team were able to put together yesterday. Either 8 or 10. OptaJoe on Twitter posted it last night.

Now try and tell me Young is better than Hazard.

How fucking stupid are you? When one team sets up very defensively and looks to play Chelsea's brand of anti-football, they are bound to create less chances. Their opposition are also bound to have more opportunities to create chances, while their opposition are bound to create more. If one attacking midfielder has many opportunities to create a goal, but fails, and his opponent creates the match winning goal, it is completely obvious that his opponent has had a much better game.

People like Samuel are the reason why barely anyone respects Chelsea fans

You have my sympathy, Sean.

Kuled wrote:You have my sympathy, Sean.

+ Moose.

Hitchy wrote:People like Samuel are the reason why barely anyone respects Chelsea fans

No, people don't respect Chelsea fans because they are racist, send bullets to Anton Ferdinand, Boo during minutes silences, mock the dead, boo injured players, and are totally classless cunts.

You are also many of them things, Derek.

Rafael Benitez wrote:

Hitchy wrote:People like Samuel are the reason why barely anyone respects Chelsea fans

No, people don't respect Chelsea fans because they are racist, send bullets to Anton Ferdinand, Boo during minutes silences, mock the dead, boo injured players, and are totally classless cunts.

I'm curious, how are Chelsea fans racist?