Roberto Mancini feels that he needs a bigger squad

Danny wrote:

ConorCelticFC wrote:

What bullshit. That greedy granny-shagging cunt that you so idolize only apologized after you'd given him a nice fat pay rise to spunk on hookers and hair. Which, let's face it, was all he'd wanted from the start. Rooney doesn't give a shit about you.. get over it.

If he didn't give a shit he wouldn't be here you cunt.

Fergie could have only done so much to keep him here. End of the day he changed his mind about the bollocks he was saying about we can't challenge any more (1 CL Final and almost consecutive titles later... )

And all right then. He's not been booked in the league.

Kuled wrote:

ConorCelticFC wrote:

Wrong

..Right

Rick Rosstrich wrote:ConorCeltic - successful troll is successful.

ViVaRooney wrote:atleast we dont need our title challengers to be deducted points to win the league

ViVaRooney wrote:

James wrote:Errrr Man U fans couldn't stop complaining about all of their injuries, it isn't as if you just ignored it and got on with it.

who said anything about fans??

Kuled wrote:

James wrote:Errrr Man U fans couldn't stop complaining about all of their injuries, it isn't as if you just ignored it and got on with it.

He's talking about the club - The manager (Ferguson) not the fans.

Rick Rosstrich wrote:If you look at the injury table, you'd understand why Ferguson complained. I haven't got a fully up to date one but on February 1st Manchester United had suffered 177 injuries to first team players; Manchester City had experienced 30.

Even right now Manchester United have 7 players out while City have only 2, one being Toure who was injured yesterday.

kyro7 wrote:Our injuries were spoken about, quite often actually, Fergie never really cried about it, he always said we've got a big squad, but it seems like Mancini blames it, uses it as an excuse, and that's quite odd considering we've had more injuries, by far.

ViVaRooney wrote:and pizarro fixed that??? lol

Rei Andros wrote:

ViVaRooney wrote:and pizarro fixed that??? lol

Where did I say he fixed it?

Rei Andros wrote:Quoting somehow I said that doesn't imply what you said is puzzling. It simply says that without Pizarro there would be no creativity in the City midfield when Silva was out.

If you read my original post carefully, the first two sentences would contradict the last sentence by your logic.

ViVaRooney wrote:i knew what you were trying to say but was taking the piss at the somehow instead of something lol which made no sense

everything i have said is correct, you said If they didn't get Pizarro on loan than the midfield would be a black hole wbere creativity went to die. for me even with pizarro the midfield is a black hole where creativity went to die, thats why i questioned your statement

seriously sometimes i think you people just post to cause controversy

Rei Andros wrote:Controversy?

I can't see how you would say Pizarro doesn't add creativity to the City midfield. He's a better and more intelligent passer of the ball than either Toure, Barry, De Jong or Milner.

Gatsby wrote:

ViVaRooney wrote:i knew what you were trying to say but was taking the piss at the somehow instead of something lol which made no sense

everything i have said is correct, you said If they didn't get Pizarro on loan than the midfield would be a black hole wbere creativity went to die. for me even with pizarro the midfield is a black hole where creativity went to die, thats why i questioned your statement

seriously sometimes i think you people just post to cause controversy

Yet it's always you in asinine arguments

Rei Andros wrote:Controversy?

I can't see how you would say Pizarro doesn't add creativity to the City midfield. He's a better and more intelligent passer of the ball than either Toure, Barry, De Jong or Milner.

Danny wrote:Oh yeah, I'm sure Madrid/City couldn't have offered him more.

And he's not been booked in the league all season, find where he has.

Better still, fuck off from here you turd.