Man United vs QPR | 08/04/2012 | Kick off: 1:30 PM

jeb4eva wrote:Well we got the victory we needed anyway. Some awful decisions made, especially the first goal. The linesman is in direct line with the play.

Alan wrote:Offside and a dive and yes the Drogba goal was offside but Macheda handball when he made it 1-2 that day but some seem to forget this. And the FA are a fucking joke for not changing the decision on Derry's red card.

Dr. Ján Ĩtor wrote:the FA have rejected QPR's appeal against shaun derry's red card

ViVaRooney wrote:ahm it wasnt a dive.. he did get nudged, when turning direction any contact can do that

and the fact FA have seen it as a foul after watching replays just proves that.

ViVaRooney wrote:i am sorry for bringing my logic and common sense into it

ViVaRooney wrote:well once he loses his balance what happens next depends on young. he can easily over do it to make sure the ref saw it

if he tries to stay up then pen is not given eventhough he was prevented from a scoring opportunity. you may see overreaction as diving but i sure as hell dont. many players do it to make sure ref saw it

ViVaRooney wrote:well its pretty clear FA agrees with me and since they made the rules i think they know better then you

before going "well FA favour man utd" they had no reason to reject the appeal if they felt it was a dive, since it benefits us in no way.

however little, there was contact and that contact stopped young from getting the ball, did he have to fall over? maybe not but in the end the QPR player DID stop him from being able to get the ball

kyro7 wrote:Of course it was a dive lmao

kyro7 wrote:Of course it was a dive lmao

ViVaRooney wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Of course it was a dive lmao

if it was a dive the red card would have been removed

Gatsby wrote:

ViVaRooney wrote:well its pretty clear FA agrees with me and since they made the rules i think they know better then you

before going "well FA favour man utd" they had no reason to reject the appeal if they felt it was a dive, since it benefits us in no way.

however little, there was contact and that contact stopped young from getting the ball, did he have to fall over? maybe not but in the end the QPR player DID stop him from being able to get the ball

Theres loads of examples when the FA dont over turn decisions they should, unless its really obvious they dont do it because they're afraid of undermining the referee, it doesnt prove anything

ViVaRooney wrote:

Gatsby wrote:

Theres loads of examples when the FA dont over turn decisions they should, unless its really obvious they dont do it because they're afraid of undermining the referee, it doesnt prove anything

so you think they would rather ban a player from a relegation threatened team for 2 games just to save face??