Possible removal of partial nudity in sigs and avatars

Lu❣s Suarez wrote:

Laurencio wrote:Polska's sig is no worse than what you would see in your average underwear billboard/commercial. Saying that, I don't really think Polska bases his entire identity on that one picture in the sig, so I doubt he would find it incredibly difficult to change it for something else.

I don't want to though.

ahlycotc wrote:

Lus Suarez wrote:Yah, people still don't realize I've spent the last 3 months trolling that Conor guy and the other SPL people. I bet they think I am serious as well.

Just like how you were "joking" with RR when you two got in a heated debate about UK v Poland?

The Maestro wrote:Talking of jibes Scott, you can't talk. Look at your response to my thread

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t12342-what-do-you-use-to-browse-the-forum

Completely unnecessary and makes you look like a tosser

Kuled wrote:I remember when tits were allowed in sigs Keep them.

The Maestro wrote:Talking of jibes Scott, you can't talk. Look at your response to my thread

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t12342-what-do-you-use-to-browse-the-forum

Completely unnecessary and makes you look like a tosser

The Maestro wrote:

The Maestro wrote:Talking of jibes Scott, you can't talk. Your post in my thread is the perfect example

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t12342-what-do-you-use-to-browse-the-forum

Completely unnecessary and makes you look like a tosser

Kuled wrote:I remember when tits were allowed in sigs Keep them.

Kuled wrote:

Kuled wrote:I remember when tits were allowed in sigs Keep them.

Billy Davies wrote:If there's no nipple, bare arse or minge showing then what's the big deal?


And for people saying what's the point in having a picture like that, then you could also say the same for football pictures. Is there really any point for a man in shorts to accompany your every post?

The Maestro wrote:LOL you done the same thing as me, didn't realise there was no edit button and clicked on quote

Laurencio wrote:Polska's sig is no worse than what you would see in your average underwear billboard/commercial. Saying that, I don't really think Polska bases his entire identity on that one picture in the sig, so I doubt he would find it incredibly difficult to change it for something else.

Billy Davies wrote:If there's no nipple, bare arse or minge showing then what's the big deal?


And for people saying what's the point in having a picture like that, then you could also say the same for football pictures. Is there really any point for a man in shorts to accompany your every post?

Sean wrote:

Cam wrote:Wow, no need to start being rude to me, fucking hell

Sensitive much?

King Carlos wrote:And is it not possible to identify someone by their avatar and sigs then? Surely when you see:



You know it's Polksa?

GOATarenka wrote:Triple post, care I do not.


I think there should be a height limit on sigs. Sean's being a stupid example.

Sean wrote:

GOATarenka wrote:Triple post, care I do not.


I think there should be a height limit on sigs. Sean's being a stupid example.

Why? What does mine do?

Sean wrote:

Cam wrote:Wow, no need to start being rude to me, fucking hell

Sensitive much?

ahlycotc wrote:

The Maestro wrote:Talking of jibes Scott, you can't talk. Look at your response to my thread

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t12342-what-do-you-use-to-browse-the-forum

Completely unnecessary and makes you look like a tosser

The Maestro wrote:

Kuled wrote:I remember when tits were allowed in sigs Keep them.

Kuled wrote:

What's going on?

GOATarenka wrote:

Sean wrote:

Why? What does mine do?

It's too tall. On 95% of other forums, that wouldn't be allowed.

Jamieb08 wrote:Ignore it, he's just a total retard.

Muhkoo wrote:If possible give the option to not with other peoples signatures, i could see that being used, even more for animated pictures.

I voted NO

I miss The Corner

Kuled wrote:

Jamieb08 wrote:Ignore it, he's just a total retard.

Was that aimed at me or The Maestro? .