Possible removal of partial nudity in sigs and avatars

Cam wrote:I don't mind it in avatars, but not in big signatures like that

Cam wrote:Wow, no need to start being rude to me, fucking hell

Cam wrote:Wow, no need to start being rude to me, fucking hell

Cam wrote:Wow, no need to start being rude to me, fucking hell

Scott. wrote:Lol at this thread.

First of all, it's more embarrassing to be seen posting on a forum, than it is to be seen looking at half naked women.

Secondly, do people actually give a fuck that other people might see these half naked woman in sigs/avatars? I've only ever had one person mention it to me and it was my own brother, who just simply asked "What's that?" and I replied with something along the lines of "A football forum" to which he said "Oh" and then proceeded to say whatever it was he came in to tell me. No big deal.

I think people should stop being such fucking pansies and get a grip.

I am up for banning gifs from sigs though, 'cause when I'm at a friend's or something and they have shit internet, gifs slow down the pages like fuck. Ban something for a valid reason .. like what I just said .. not half naked pictures just because a few shy people are paranoid about what other people think of what's on their screen.

BladeGunner wrote:Why do you hormonal fuckers need to have pictures of half-naked women show up next to your every post? I don't see how it benefits anyone. Get rid of it if some people find it embarrassing.

Sean wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:Why do you hormonal fuckers need to have pictures of half-naked women show up next to your every post? I don't see how it benefits anyone. Get rid of it if some people find it embarrassing.

So you're saying, we should ignore what a certain group of people want because another group of people want the opposite?

Lu❣s Suarez wrote:Yah good fucking point Jord.

What's next? banning of bad language? Fuck you too.

Nobody is going to cry over a little image. And if you are in a public place viewing this forum, that's your fault anyways. Why would you want to browse this site in the library or at school anyway? Sounds like having no-life to me.

Scott. wrote:

Scott. wrote:Lol at this thread.

First of all, it's more embarrassing to be seen posting on a forum, than it is to be seen looking at half naked women.

Secondly, do people actually give a fuck that other people might see these half naked woman in sigs/avatars? I've only ever had one person mention it to me and it was my own brother, who just simply asked "What's that?" and I replied with something along the lines of "A football forum" to which he said "Oh" and then proceeded to say whatever it was he came in to tell me. No big deal.

I think people should stop being such fucking pansies and get a grip.

I am up for banning gifs from sigs though, 'cause when I'm at a friend's or something and they have shit internet, gifs slow down the pages like fuck. Ban something for a valid reason .. like what I just said .. not half naked pictures just because a few shy people are paranoid about what other people think of what's on their screen.

BladeGunner wrote:

Sean wrote:

So you're saying, we should ignore what a certain group of people want because another group of people want the opposite?

Yes, because their wants are actually justified to an extent. And that's exactly what all the other people on the same side as you have said but you haven't questioned them, so fuck off if you're going to try to be a smart-arse.

Sean wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Yes, because their wants are actually justified to an extent. And that's exactly what all the other people on the same side as you have said but you haven't questioned them, so fuck off if you're going to try to be a smart-arse.

Why are they justified?