Possible removal of partial nudity in sigs and avatars

Lu❣s Suarez wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:You can have women, just not naked women. Your sig is showing a bare ass (that thong isn't covering anything, let's be honest) and that bra isn't leaving anything to the imagination.

Are you stupid?

What did I say that is wrong?

There, problem fixed.

Now this thread can be closed because I don't think anyone else needs to change their signature... except for Forest.

Basically. Which is why this should have been an easy solution.

Good form.

Polska, are you fucking retarded? What's the point of having them in a spoiler? The concept of putting semi-nude women in your signature was stupid enough as it was, but to have them there without them even being visible, that's borderline retardation. Just save it as your desktop wallpaper or something if you're so desperate to look at that one picture.

I believe that banning them would help keep members' blood in their heads, and thus encourage more rational posts and sophisticated discussion.

I like having her there. I don't need to see her every post.

More like a welcoming nymph sharing her presence whenever I need to find a link.

This is actually a tough decision to make. Yes I was one of the two undecided voters. If you want or like the idea of having in the 13-16 age range then they need to go. I believe with the people we got now would be ok with things as they are. Maybe we can have a seperate women's football section for stuff somewhat like this. Since we all know how rubbish women's football is the easily offended people would not visit that forum. Although the pictures would not be in your sig but then you will at least have somewhere you can post this type of stuff.

Glen Damon wrote:I believe that banning them would help keep members' blood in their heads, and thus encourage more rational posts and sophisticated discussion.

Glen, you are great!

I agree, they should be removed, fucking embarrassing when I'm on my PC and I have People in my house being able to see.. I need to explain it's not a porn site everytime almost.There's no point, you want to see and show everybody some naked slut everytime you post for what reason? It's stupid.

you faggot ass pre teens hiding your screen from your mummy

grow some balls

no for me

mauro=beast wrote:you faggot ass pre teens hiding your screen from your mummy

grow some balls

no for me

[quote=Viva Ronaldo 7]Because you are 83[/quote]

34-24 the fuck?

I think it's been decided

A bit surprised considering the nature of the forum... in some aspects at least.

dena wrote:I think it's been decided

A bit surprised considering the nature of the forum... in some aspects at least.

Yes it is quite odd, maybe we lost too many of the good people for all the trolls roaming

JUST KEEP POSTING MORE PLAYER COMPARISON THREADS

I voted yes to be a killjoy to the people with them

Holly Earl is staying where she is.

what is this? the EA forums? why are we banning stupid shit now for no good reason

my co-worker gets offended everytime they see a generic manutd sig or avtr. should we start banning those as well?

Schnix wrote:what is this? the EA forums? why are we banning stupid shit now for no good reason

my co-worker gets offended everytime they see a generic manutd sig or avtr. should we start banning those as well?

It's about appropriate and nonsexual material, simple as that.

I actually have nothing against these types of signatures, I just want rid of Forest's. Irritating to say the least.

Who voted undecided? What kind of person does that?

Sean wrote:Who voted undecided? What kind of person does that?

Someone who is undecided on the issue.

Then just dont vote, why is undecided even an option.

Sean wrote:Then just dont vote, why is undecided even an option.

For those who are undecided.

I'm leaving the forum too.

Goodbye.

Fucks sake wrong fucking thread.

ShakerMatty wrote:Fucks sake wrong fucking thread.

way to leave a mark

I'm just saying, but I'm the youngest member on the forum and none of this bothers me at all, I don't care whether friends or family see it, and I certainly don't find it embarrassing. If that's how people choose to express themselves, then let it be, why should it bother us?

Lil-Milzer-Ladd wrote:I'm the youngest member on the forum

Makes your opinion irrelevant

Kuled wrote:

Lil-Milzer-Ladd wrote:I'm the youngest member on the forum

Makes your opinion irrelevant

Well that's just lies, as one of the worries is that "Children will not be happy by what they see"

So I believe my point is indeed, incredibly relevant to the situation.

Kuled wrote:

Lil-Milzer-Ladd wrote:I'm the youngest member on the forum

Makes your opinion irrelevant

Agreed.