Rangers in administration (lozies)

Totti wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:We've not got a £100million bill though.

It's only a possibility.

We wouldn't start at the bottom, automatic SPL re-entry.

Anyway, Phoenix club sound good.

I know you don't actually think that, but I'll bite anyway.

You need 11 out of 12 SPL clubs to let you back in to the league. It's a very small chance that you wouldn't get in, but it's still a possibility. There's no guarantee.

Secondly, there is not a single straight thinking Rangers fan alive that wants to see the club liquidated and another club formed.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Totti wrote:

I know you don't actually think that, but I'll bite anyway.

You need 11 out of 12 SPL clubs to let you back in to the league. It's a very small chance that you wouldn't get in, but it's still a possibility. There's no guarantee.

Secondly, there is not a single straight thinking Rangers fan alive that wants to see the club liquidated and another club formed.

It's not another club, it's exactly the same, with the same history, the same fans etc etc.

TheRangersFan wrote:

Laurencio wrote:There is no way Rangers can survive a 100M tax bill. Your annual turnover is 35M, with expenditures closingin on 45M, a 100M on top of that woukd be impossible.

Annual turnover at the last set of audited accounts was around 57m.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:Anyway, A Phoenix club is a perfect idea, keep the history and wipe out the tax bill = no debt! #celikfansgreetinfuryeerzminlololol

Laurencio wrote:

TheRangersFan wrote:

Annual turnover at the last set of audited accounts was around 57m.

Still not enough tosurvive a 100M tax bill on top of the other debt.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:Anyway, A Phoenix club is a perfect idea, keep the history and wipe out the tax bill = no debt! #celikfansgreetinfuryeerzminlololol

Except all your players contracts will have to be cancelled, contract fees will have to be paid, Ibrox will go on sale, training ground will go on sale and you will have to restart th club with no money what so ever.

Mr. Hassard wrote:I do have a general knowledge of how business works, but in all honesty this whole administration thing is taking me a while for me to get my head around it. But my gut feeling is that we, Glasgow Rangers Football Club, will survive. But there will always be a Glasgow Rangers - either in its current form, or as a new club formed by the fans.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Laurencio wrote:

Still not enough tosurvive a 100M tax bill on top of the other debt.



Except all your players contracts will have to be cancelled, contract fees will have to be paid, Ibrox will go on sale, training ground will go on sale and you will have to restart th club with no money what so ever.

Ibrox is a listed building.

Rangers don't own Murray Park, David Murray does.

We'll keep all the money that we currently have as it'll go into another Craig Whyte account.

Jordi wrote:Jela, if AFC Rangers or whatever it's called is formed, you won't keep all your history, nor be able to afford to keep Ibrox.

Dan wrote:

Jordi wrote:Jela, if AFC Rangers or whatever it's called is formed, you won't keep all your history, nor be able to afford to keep Ibrox.

They can. AFC Wimbledon have the history of Wimbledon, AFC Chester have the history of Chester City etc.

Dan wrote:

Jordi wrote:Jela, if AFC Rangers or whatever it's called is formed, you won't keep all your history, nor be able to afford to keep Ibrox.

They can. AFC Wimbledon have the history of Wimbledon, AFC Chester have the history of Chester City etc.

Jordi wrote:

Dan wrote:

They can. AFC Wimbledon have the history of Wimbledon, AFC Chester have the history of Chester City etc.

They can in a sense, but the trophies won't be theirs, will they?

Plus every site would say formed in 2013 or whatever.

Jordi wrote:

Dan wrote:

They can. AFC Wimbledon have the history of Wimbledon, AFC Chester have the history of Chester City etc.

They can in a sense, but the trophies won't be theirs, will they?

Plus every site would say formed in 2013 or whatever.

Dan wrote:

Jordi wrote:They can in a sense, but the trophies won't be theirs, will they?

Plus every site would say formed in 2013 or whatever.

Depends on what is agreed. AFC Wimbledon still are founded in 2002/2003 but have Wimbledon's history behind them.

Totti wrote:

Dan wrote:

They can. AFC Wimbledon have the history of Wimbledon, AFC Chester have the history of Chester City etc.

I thought MK Dons were the new Wimbledon, and then a new Wimbledon came up?

Not really sure.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Mr. Hassard wrote:I do have a general knowledge of how business works, but in all honesty this whole administration thing is taking me a while for me to get my head around it. But my gut feeling is that we, Glasgow Rangers Football Club, will survive. But there will always be a Glasgow Rangers - either in its current form, or as a new club formed by the fans.

We're not called Glasgow Rangers mate, the word 'Glasgow' is nowhere in the official name therefore, we could call a Phoenix club that.

Jordi wrote:

Dan wrote:

Depends on what is agreed. AFC Wimbledon still are founded in 2002/2003 but have Wimbledon's history behind them.

I thought Franchise FC would have Wimbledon's history behind them.

Adz wrote:Can't see Rangers getting Liquidated IMO, there to bigger club to just 'vanish'.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Adz wrote:Can't see Rangers getting Liquidated IMO, there to bigger club to just 'vanish'.

Even if liquidated, we still wouldn't vanish. Phoenix club would be formed.

Adz wrote:

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Even if liquidated, we still wouldn't vanish. Phoenix club would be formed.

Rangers will still exist I'd say, there a too bigger club, and someone will come in and pay the debt.

Dan wrote:

Adz wrote:
Rangers will still exist I'd say, there a too bigger club, and someone will come in and pay the debt.

And get what in return? A club pissing money? Nah, looks like these are done.

Dan wrote:

Adz wrote:
Rangers will still exist I'd say, there a too bigger club, and someone will come in and pay the debt.

And get what in return? A club pissing money? Nah, looks like these are done.

Jelavić7|EFC wrote:

Dan wrote:

And get what in return? A club pissing money? Nah, looks like these are done.

We don't piss money, we make £10million less than we need a year, WITHOUT European football. Therefore, we could make it that way or through new sponsorship i.e. stadium naming rights etc.