Lus Suarez wrote:
No, just reorganize it so that 4 teams are relegated at the end of the season from Blue Square North/South instead of 3. To keep the balance, have the teams in Northern and Southern Premier League and SPL playoffs play each other in a bigger play off game instead of keeping the playoff system local.Grenade wrote:
Not possible as they would need to displace another club in the middle and it would be unfair on the other clubs behind them. To play in English football they need to start right from the bottom.
Lu❣s Suarez wrote:Lots of clubs in Europe monopolize their leagues and are still fine.
Celtic would obviously need success in Europe to support themselves, but if they did, I see no reason why they couldn't improve. There is an upper barrier on how much they could improve yes, but the point stands.
Dan wrote:Lu❣s Suarez wrote:Lots of clubs in Europe monopolize their leagues and are still fine.
Celtic would obviously need success in Europe to support themselves, but if they did, I see no reason why they couldn't improve. There is an upper barrier on how much they could improve yes, but the point stands.
Really? And these are high standard leagues with reputable success in Europe yes?
Thanks RR. Likewise with La Liga, Serie A and Ligue 1.Dan wrote:Lu❣s Suarez wrote:Lots of clubs in Europe monopolize their leagues and are still fine.
Celtic would obviously need success in Europe to support themselves, but if they did, I see no reason why they couldn't improve. There is an upper barrier on how much they could improve yes, but the point stands.
Really? And these are high standard leagues with reputable success in Europe yes?
Lu❣s Suarez wrote:Thanks RR. Likewise with La Liga, Serie A and Ligue 1.Dan wrote:
Really? And these are high standard leagues with reputable success in Europe yes?
I was thinking more on the lines of Steuea in Romania in the 90's, Red Star in Serbia in the 90's, Widzew Lodz in Poland in the 80's and part of the 90's, Sparta Prague in the 2000's, Kobenhavn in the 2000's, Ajax for most of history, probably a mention from Russia, Ukraine, Belgium and Greece as well.
Dan wrote:ntless comparing now to clubs in the 90's and 80's. It's a different ball-game completely.
If Rangers were to leave, Celtic would be worse off for it. Yeah, they might win a few more SPL titles, but who is seriously going to want to move to a league such as that?
The Maestro wrote:Dan wrote:ntless comparing now to clubs in the 90's and 80's. It's a different ball-game completely.
If Rangers were to leave, Celtic would be worse off for it. Yeah, they might win a few more SPL titles, but who is seriously going to want to move to a league such as that?
What you are saying is completely subjective though.
Celtics chairman has already quashed the suggestion that Celtic would be worse off without Rangers
The league would be more competitive without Rangers. Their financial doping has resulted in the demise of Scottish football. The idea that it would be worse in a league that would immediately present more opportunities for success is patently absurd. It would present other teams with the chance to compete. This is the perfect opportunity to rejuvenate our league.
The Maestro wrote:Dan wrote:ntless comparing now to clubs in the 90's and 80's. It's a different ball-game completely.
If Rangers were to leave, Celtic would be worse off for it. Yeah, they might win a few more SPL titles, but who is seriously going to want to move to a league such as that?
What you are saying is completely subjective though.
Celtics chairman has already quashed the suggestion that Celtic would be worse off without Rangers
The league would be more competitive without Rangers. Their financial doping has resulted in the demise of Scottish football. The idea that it would be worse in a league that would immediately present more opportunities for success is patently absurd. It would present other teams with the chance to compete. This is the perfect opportunity to rejuvenate our league.
Dan wrote:
I don't agree.
The Maestro wrote:Dan wrote:
I don't agree.
That's fine, but so far you haven't offered anything substantial at all in the way of a rebuttal.
You are rotting with them.The Maestro wrote:Rot? You are misguided if you think Celtic will rot without Rangers.
Big_Lad_Pardew wrote:You are rotting with them.The Maestro wrote:Rot? You are misguided if you think Celtic will rot without Rangers.
I read somewhere that he hadn't paid over £9m in tax since he arrived.The Maestro wrote:Jordi, remember when I said you didn't nkow what you were going on about when you kept getting confused and saying Craig Whyte was the one who didn't pay tax ... You were right, hasn't paid a penny since he arrived
Meanwhile over on the Playmaker Jela sports his Craig Whyte apprecation sig and avatar
The Maestro wrote:skysarahjane Sarah-Jane Mee
Reports suggest #Rangers owner Craig Whyte has left the country.......he's gone to the South of France......that'll go down well in Glasgow.
Jordi wrote:I read somewhere that he hadn't paid over £9m in tax since he arrived.
Jelavić7|EFC wrote:Been reading many Rangers forums over the past few days and it's great to see that the whole club including fans are behind Sir Craig Thomas Whyte.
Drake wrote:Well the fans i spoke to yesterday seemed to be against Craig Whyte
Drake wrote:So what has Whyte done during his reign that can make these 'confused' fans more postivie?
|
|
|
