I agree he should not have banned but there is no point complaining about it now, the beast is back and he better play down the right on Saturday 
+13
ResurrectionRooney
Grenade
Scouser_Dave
drivescore
Paulinho
Jorlung
Phadunkin Donuts
Carlos Jenkinson
Jeff
Danny
Benitez
Ham.
dena
17 posters
Dalglish: Suarez should never have been banned
drivescore-
- Posts : 1336
Age : 29
Location : Toronto
Supports : Arsenal FC, FC Bayern Munich, Liverpool FC
Scouser_Dave-
- Posts : 7498
- Post n°62
Re: Dalglish: Suarez should never have been banned
by Scouser_Dave Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:12 pm
Splashy wrote:Disgusting:
Probably aiming for Ledley King the racist bastard
Last edited by Scouser_Dave on Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Paulinho-
- Formerly known as : psyroukis
Posts : 4149
Age : 31
Location : Melbourne
Supports : Arsenal
Scouser_Dave wrote:Splashy wrote:Disgusting:
Probably aiming for Ledley King this racist bastard
Grenade-
- Formerly known as : grenade187
Posts : 9113
Age : 43
The reason Liverpool did not appeal is because the facts provided to back up Evra were irrefutable. Suarez may not be a racist (not that we could know for sure) but he broke the rules and that's that. You can't just say "oh we didn't know we couldn't do that" and get let off 
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
- Post n°65
Re: Dalglish: Suarez should never have been banned
by ResurrectionRooney Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:05 pm
Scott wrote:Dalglish believes Suarez to be be innocent. So do I. It was a cultural misunderstanding that Evra took in the wrong way.
The FA chose to believe Evra over Suarez, over 'probability'. Which is fucking pathetic.
The FA didn't decide this case, and independent commission did. If the decision was so obviously incorrect then an appeal to a different independent commission would almost certainly have been successful.
Also, the balance of probability is what a substantial part of the legal process in this country is based on, and what all FA decisions previous have been based on. Roy Keane was banned twice for his tackle on Haaland on the basis that he probably did it intentionally, was that some kind of injustice? The same for Benjamin Thatcher's assault on Pedro Mendes, then of Portsmouth. Injustice?
Guest- Guest
Stupid comment to make.
Should have just left it alone. But once again he's showed himself up.
Should have just left it alone. But once again he's showed himself up.
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
why is this news? don't we all already know the he thought this??? 
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
- Post n°68
Re: Dalglish: Suarez should never have been banned
by ResurrectionRooney Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:37 pm
It brings the game into disrepute.El_indian wrote:why is this news? don't we all already know the he thought this???
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
not really....I don't think anything less of it.
Scouser_Dave-
- Posts : 7498
- Post n°70
Re: Dalglish: Suarez should never have been banned
by Scouser_Dave Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:19 pm
El_indian wrote:why is this news? don't we all already know the he thought this???
What do you expect, the majority of this forum is obsessed with hating Liverpool.
easley91-
- Posts : 4463
Age : 33
Location : Crawley
Supports : Tottenham, Crawley, Lesnar, Brewster, Coppell
I don't hate Liverpool, just hate Saurez, because he is a prick. Kenny didn't need to say that, he's just bringing it up again when he could just let it go. He served his ban and is back (though should've been sent off last night to be honest) just continue with the season.
I don't get the hate for Parker though.
I don't get the hate for Parker though.
Jorlung-
- Posts : 5285
Age : 92
Location : Canada
Supports : TFC
No wonder you bum Suarez so much.Benitez wrote:Splashy wrote:Disgusting:
Shame he didn't kick him harder
Steadman-
- Posts : 6134
Age : 32
Location : London
Supports : I have humor, yes.
Liverpool vs the world.
Guest- Guest
Kenny Dalglish brought it up again.El_indian wrote:why is this news? don't we all already know the he thought this???
Guest- Guest
easley91 wrote:I don't get the hate for Parker though.
He's joined Bale on the over rated hate wagon.
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
I was more annoyed by pleading the fifth tbh. First of all there is no fifth amendment in the UK. Second, the right to avoid self-incrimination does not apply to incriminating others (rather obviously). Third, it's an american refrence, not a british one 
But yeah... Who cares what he thinks? Suarez served his suspension without kicking up a fuss, so for my part he's served his punishment and starts on blank slates. Dalglish talks a lot of rubbish, but to be fair Suarez has been fairly dignified in his handling of the event, it's his employer who do weird things, not him.
But yeah... Who cares what he thinks? Suarez served his suspension without kicking up a fuss, so for my part he's served his punishment and starts on blank slates. Dalglish talks a lot of rubbish, but to be fair Suarez has been fairly dignified in his handling of the event, it's his employer who do weird things, not him.
Jorlung-
- Posts : 5285
Age : 92
Location : Canada
Supports : TFC
Laurencio wrote:But yeah... Who cares what he thinks? Suarez served his suspension without kicking up a fuss, so for my part he's served his punishment and starts on blank slates. Dalglish talks a lot of rubbish, but to be fair Suarez has been fairly dignified in his handling of the event, it's his employer who do weird things, not him.
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
Jorlung wrote:Laurencio wrote:But yeah... Who cares what he thinks? Suarez served his suspension without kicking up a fuss, so for my part he's served his punishment and starts on blank slates. Dalglish talks a lot of rubbish, but to be fair Suarez has been fairly dignified in his handling of the event, it's his employer who do weird things, not him.
I said Suarez, not Liverpool.
Guest- Guest
He hasn't really kicked up a fuss though, he's said one thing out of loads of different stuff in an interview and people are picking up on it 
Jorlung-
- Posts : 5285
Age : 92
Location : Canada
Supports : TFC
I suppose you're not familiar with the "Lame Pun ice cream" and/or did not see that pun in that statement.Laurencio wrote:Jorlung wrote:
I said Suarez, not Liverpool.
Last edited by Jorlung on Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:12 am; edited 1 time in total
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
Jorlung wrote:I suppose you're not familiar with the "Lame Pun ice cream" and/or did not see that pun in that statement.Laurencio wrote:
I said Suarez, not Liverpool.
I am not.
Cam wrote:He hasn't really kicked up a fuss though, he's said one thing out of loads of different stuff in an interview and people are picking up on it
That my friend, is a fuss.
Last edited by Laurencio on Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:14 am; edited 1 time in total
Jorlung-
- Posts : 5285
Age : 92
Location : Canada
Supports : TFC
Wtf C o o n sensors to ice cream?
Is that some sort of insult in the UK? Over here it just is short for racoon lol.
Is that some sort of insult in the UK? Over here it just is short for racoon lol.
Guest- Guest
Cam wrote:He hasn't really kicked up a fuss though, he's said one thing out of loads of different stuff in an interview and people are picking up on it
Should never have mentioned it at all. Wasn't even asked about it.
Guest- Guest
Yeah it is insulting, I had to google it myself because I didn't know either.Jorlung wrote:Wtf C o o n sensors to ice cream?
Is that some sort of insult in the UK? Over here it just is short for racoon lol.
C o o n
An insulting name for a black person. Similar to 'N i g g e r'.
Black man: "What's up homie?"
White man: "Can't you c o o n's talk proper English?"
Black man: *Shoots White Man*
Guest- Guest
Grenade wrote:The reason Liverpool did not appeal is because the facts provided to back up Evra were irrefutable. Suarez may not be a racist (not that we could know for sure) but he broke the rules and that's that. You can't just say "oh we didn't know we couldn't do that" and get let off
We could only appeal the length of the ban, not the verdict because the whole thing was such a fucking farce.
Kenny..
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
Dan wrote:Grenade wrote:The reason Liverpool did not appeal is because the facts provided to back up Evra were irrefutable. Suarez may not be a racist (not that we could know for sure) but he broke the rules and that's that. You can't just say "oh we didn't know we couldn't do that" and get let off
We could only appeal the length of the ban, not the verdict because the whole thing was such a fucking farce.
Kenny..
Well that's not true.
Guest- Guest
Laurencio wrote:Dan wrote:
We could only appeal the length of the ban, not the verdict because the whole thing was such a fucking farce.
Kenny..
Well that's not true.
No, it is. We weren't able to appeal the decision only the punishment served.
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
Dan wrote:Laurencio wrote:
Well that's not true.
No, it is. We weren't able to appeal the decision only the punishment served.
Impossible. Appealing could bring the case to a new instance, which has far more power, and thus capable of overturning the original decision.
Guest- Guest
Laurencio wrote:Dan wrote:
No, it is. We weren't able to appeal the decision only the punishment served.
Impossible. Appealing could bring the case to a new instance, which has far more power, and thus capable of overturning the original decision.
It's not impossible, it was not done through a court of law and because of that the FA were able to make their judgement on the length of the ban.
Laurencio-
- Posts : 8730
Age : 36
Location : La Paz, Bolivia
Supports : Rosenborg, ManUtd
Dan wrote:Laurencio wrote:
Impossible. Appealing could bring the case to a new instance, which has far more power, and thus capable of overturning the original decision.
It's not impossible, it was not done through a court of law and because of that the FA were able to make their judgement on the length of the ban.
You had 14 days to appeal to a higher instance. If you had you could have argued against the decision and whatever was decided by the independent commission could easily have been irrelevant. Suarez suspension would have been put on hold until the appeal process had been completed.
