FIFA 12

Chamberlain 74, yet Livermore has been just as impressive for us and gets 70

Starting Chelsea CM.

40mil to spend.

Point wrote:Chamberlain 74, yet Livermore has been just as impressive for us and gets 70

He hasn't been just as impressive.

Yes he has.

People don't give a shit about Livermore though as he's older. He's walked into a 1st team filled with talent playing extremely well and put in some excellent performances. Most Spurs fans will agree with me.

Could be argued that Chamberlain has walked into an average team with average players and looked good but that'd be harsh on him.


I'll await the flaming for this though I stand by it though.

Chamberlain has showed the potential to become truly PHENOMENAL, I have no bias for either side here and Chamberlain has looked far and away more promising.

Wasn't talking potential. Was taking about their performances right now and Livermore has been just as impressive for Spurs as Chamberlain has for Arsenal, yet Chamberlain gets the bigger rating boost.

My point is, Chamberlain has had better performances and is better.

When he plays he's Arsenal's most impressive player, I think you're talking shit saying Livermore has been as impressive, a lot of shit.

Going to play this soon.

kyro7 wrote:My point is, Chamberlain has had better performances and is better.

When he plays he's Arsenal's most impressive player, I think you're talking shit saying Livermore has been as impressive, a lot of shit.

Don't care if you think I'm chatting shit. A lot of Spurs fans have commented on him this season and how well he's done filling in in midfield and elsewhere and not looked out of place.

Point wrote:Wasn't talking potential. Was taking about their performances right now and Livermore has been just as impressive for Spurs as Chamberlain has for Arsenal, yet Chamberlain gets the bigger rating boost.

Technically Livermore got a higher boost from 64->70 (6), than Chamberlain from 69-74 (5).

Someone check career mode and tell me if QPR and Malaga have improved budgets

Point wrote:

kyro7 wrote:My point is, Chamberlain has had better performances and is better.

When he plays he's Arsenal's most impressive player, I think you're talking shit saying Livermore has been as impressive, a lot of shit.

Don't care if you think I'm chatting shit. A lot of Spurs fans have commented on him this season and how well he's done filling in in midfield and elsewhere and not looked out of place.

Chamberlain in most of his games has been one of our best players
Livermore as you claim has done what's asked which would make him decent

Hmmm yeah on par with each other... Ok

Jorlung wrote:

Point wrote:Wasn't talking potential. Was taking about their performances right now and Livermore has been just as impressive for Spurs as Chamberlain has for Arsenal, yet Chamberlain gets the bigger rating boost.

Technically Livermore got a higher boost from 64->70 (6), than Chamberlain from 69-74 (5).

Yeah I meant bigger overall boost

Point wrote:

kyro7 wrote:My point is, Chamberlain has had better performances and is better.

When he plays he's Arsenal's most impressive player, I think you're talking shit saying Livermore has been as impressive, a lot of shit.

Don't care if you think I'm chatting shit. A lot of Spurs fans have commented on him this season and how well he's done filling in in midfield and elsewhere and not looked out of place.

Look, I'm not saying Livermore has been bad by any stretch, he's been good, but Chamberlain has been phenomenal when given the chance, 74 is too low.

Viva Ronaldo 7 wrote:Someone check career mode and tell me if QPR and Malaga have improved budgets

On Amateur

QPR 13M

Malaga 63m

Anzhi 42m

Fonseca wrote:

Point wrote:

Don't care if you think I'm chatting shit. A lot of Spurs fans have commented on him this season and how well he's done filling in in midfield and elsewhere and not looked out of place.

Chamberlain in most of his games has been one of our best players
Livermore as you claim has done what's asked which would make him decent

Hmmm yeah on par with each other... Ok

Being Arsenals most impressive player ain't exactly fucking hard at the moment is it...

Whereas being singled out and praised in ours is considering our season...

Andy wrote:

Viva Ronaldo 7 wrote:Someone check career mode and tell me if QPR and Malaga have improved budgets

On Amateur

QPR 13M

Malaga 63m

Anzhi 42m

QPR's is still quite shit, Malaga and Anzhi are quite decent, could be worth a career mode with Malaga

Typical Point

Theo Filippo wrote:Typical Point

Not really

1st time I've been accused of over rating a Spurs player. Must be slipping in my old age

Hmm ok let's assess this then

Van Persie
Koscielny
Poland
Sagna

Chamberlain being better than most of those whereas Livermore has fitted in with

Modric
Parker

Yeah man makes a lot of sense, it's a no brainer

Fonseca wrote:Hmm ok let's assess this then

Van Persie
Koscielny
Poland
Sagna

Chamberlain being better than most of those whereas Livermore has fitted in with

Modric
Parker

Yeah man makes a lot of sense, it's a no brainer

Don't know what you're trying to do there, as Modric and Parker probably have been better than your entire team this season as a whole bar RvP

Forgetting Bale, VDV, Lennon ect.

Yeah ok...

Since when did Livermore play where Bale, VDV or Lennon play? am I missing something?

@Jorlung
He said Livermore should be on par with Chamberlain because he has filled in spurs midfield at times, I said Chamberlain has been one our best players who have competition better than his. Livermore's facing Modric/Parker for filling in, Chamberlain's facing Van Persie, Koscielny, Sagna and Poland for being our best player... What's not to get?

I said he got singled out from our midfield and praised. Bale and that are part of that midfield are they not?

He's come into our midfield when needed and been singled out as having performed very well.

What does that even mean? He doesn't play where Bale plays, so why is that 'filling in' (for bale in midfield). That makes no sense whatsoever

In our midfield he's been singled out in numerous games as having been the best performer.

Maybe you should lay off the drugs

Changing your story now... nonetheless how does that mean he's on par with Chamberlain?

Oh look, McShane has been singled out in numerous games as being Hull's best performer... He must be on par with Thiago Silva

What the fuck?

Point is a nice guy, sensible guy...whenever he's not talking about Spurs or Harry Redkapp.

Anybody want to tell me the Guadalajara ratings. I mean I'm going to see them in like 25 minutes but you know.

This argument is ridiculous. Chamberlain has come in and done very well to the extent that people have called for him to be taken as part of an England squad that already has an abundance of wingers. No one's even considering the possibility of Livermore being part of an English squad that has a seriously limited midfield. That on its own shows that Chamberlain's been more impressive than Livermore. The only people who disagree with that are the Tottenham fans who Point has apparently been hanging out with. Also, can you point out these games that he's been the best midfield performer in, please?

Haven't changed it at all....

He's fitted in, as in taken over a role usually done by another player, and been just as good or better and as a result been singled out by fans and some journalists and praised. Same shit as Chamberlain he's come on and taken over from another player (Walcott, Gervinho etc.) and been praised.

Jesus fucking Christ. I'm done talking to you as you are either playing dumb or just plain don't get it for some reason