by ResurrectionRooney Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:12 pm
Alan wrote: ResurrectionRooney wrote:I agree with you, but how is this going to change anything?
I think thats a question that should really be answered by the women in question and her family. Im just a fan, and i feel for her and her family and would feel for anyone who had to lose a member of their family in this way or anything like it. And im sure there are people all over the world have lost memebers of their families in certain ways and have fought to find out the truth.
But i dont think it would take a genius to work it out, because if you would not fight for a member of your family that this had happened to, so they could find out the truth you are just dead to me, or more brain dead than i could have ever imagined.
I tell you honestly that I can't understand for the life of me why someone would want to continue this fight for 20 years. If a member of my family died in such circumstances I wouldn't give a damn what a judge said in an inquest. Perhaps this is not normal behaviour, but I have always maintained that I am not normal, I am exceptional, and I'm aware that people can behave irrationally when their child has died and they feel someone is responsible(eg. James Bulger's mother), but I don't think it's fitting for us as a society to carry this on and on, be it through judge's decrees or by the public backing a fight for justice. Even if you win, what have you won? The child is still dead.
I'm sure the usual morons will be along soon accusing me of trolling, biased or looking for a reaction, but the fact of the matter is that I'm expressing an honest point of view respectfully on an open forum.