by Lux Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:18 am
Laurencio wrote:"Kick it out" is the anti-racism foundation established and sanction by FIFA, and is considered to be the primary anti-racism foundation in football. Liverpool have considered themselves to be staunch supporters of "Kick it out".
I don't care who they are, it doesn't change my point that they have no place to be taking sides. We all know they are against racism....so? This is an investigation and they have nothing to offer which will help.
Laurencio wrote:"Kick it Out" and all the other organizations complaining aren't at all saying that the decision from the FA is unquestionably right. They are saying what I've been saying ever since that statement of yours was released. Liverpool is handling it badly.
Kick it out have handled it badly too.
Liverpool have an interest in defending their player who they believe in. It's quite obvious that under these circumstances they will defend Suarez whether he is found guilty or not, because they don't believe he should be guilty. It's fairly public what was said.....the only argument is differing opinions. I wouldn't blame Liverpool are not accepting any decision made.
Are Liverpool wrong and handling it badly by thinking Suarez isn't guilty? I don't think so, and I don't think Suarez deserves the ban either.
polska. wrote:Which is stupid, why not use Terry as the example? He actually said something racist and intended it, and what's more is the camera's caught him
I agree to an extent, but it's a bit early to be condemning Terry too.
Honestly can't understand how Terry could say something like that and mean it in a racist way when half of his team mates who are standing around him are black.