Possible removal of partial nudity in sigs and avatars

King Carlos wrote:And is it not possible to identify someone by their avatar and sigs then? Surely when you see:



You know it's Polksa?

BladeGunner wrote:I keep asking what the benefits are of keeping them and I receive no responses.

BladeGunner wrote:

Sean wrote:

Or we see your name..

There are plenty of people with similar names like the Dans and the Jords. Without their avatars, things would be a lot more confusing.

King Carlos wrote:And is it not possible to identify someone by their avatar and sigs then? Surely when you see:



You know it's Polksa?

Cam wrote:I don't mind it in avatars, but not in big signatures like that

Scott. wrote:You all misunderstood what I meant by that.

I'm not talking about how being on the forum benefits you. I'm asking what are the benefits of you being on here, for the general forum population. I wouldn't give a fuck if any of you left, and vice versa.

King Carlos wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:I keep asking what the benefits are of keeping them and I receive no responses.

BladeGunner wrote:

There are plenty of people with similar names like the Dans and the Jords. Without their avatars, things would be a lot more confusing.

I don't get it. You're saying no one is telling you what the benefits of keeping them are. But then you go and say that without their avatars, things would be a lot more confusing, meaning you want people to keep their avatars?

Scott. wrote:I think people are just mad because every time they see a half nude picture, they're reminded of something they'll never get, and it depresses them.

obvioustroll

Scott. wrote:This forum is full of shit members though You guys honestly think this is a good discussion forum?

It's all about personal vendettas and trolls.

Scott. wrote:This forum is full of shit members though You guys honestly think this is a good discussion forum?

It's all about personal vendettas and trolls.

Scott. wrote:I didn't exclude myself in it, but you're no better Alhy. When you respond to me, it's always in a certain 'tone'. You like to add a jibe at me here and there. You're one of those people I'm talking about.

If you really wanted good discussion, you'd ignore me or respond to me politely, etc. But instead, you're sarcastic and take jabs.

Scott. wrote:"Does it ruin your reputation and make people think you are actually involved in discussions rather than maintaing your obsession with women?"

Wasn't a jab?

Scott. wrote:This forum is full of shit members though You guys honestly think this is a good discussion forum?

It's all about personal vendettas and trolls.

ahlycotc wrote:

Scott. wrote:"Does it ruin your reputation and make people think you are actually involved in discussions rather than maintaing your obsession with women?"

Wasn't a jab?

I'm talking about the last post.

BladeGunner wrote:Oh no, ahly. You're talking to him in a certain tone. You're ruining the forum.

Who's being a fucking pansie now? Dickhead.

Laurencio wrote:Polska's sig is no worse than what you would see in your average underwear billboard/commercial. Saying that, I don't really think Polska bases his entire identity on that one picture in the sig, so I doubt he would find it incredibly difficult to change it for something else.

Lus Suarez wrote:

Scott. wrote:This forum is full of shit members though You guys honestly think this is a good discussion forum?

It's all about personal vendettas and trolls.

Yah, people still don't realize I've spent the last 3 months trolling that Conor guy and the other SPL people. I bet they think I am serious as well.

The Maestro wrote:Talking of jibes Scott, you can't talk. Your post in my thread is the perfect example

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t12342-what-do-you-use-to-browse-the-forum

Completely unnecessary and makes you look like a tosser