Would you want your club to sign him for free?
(and no bullshit "Buy him then sell him, lol" answers, you can't do that in the real world.)
Steadman wrote:No, he's one of the biggest parasites in football. You're basically paying his overpriced wages for a one/two year loan until he moves on to his next club after fuckimg up your own clubs moral.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Putting aside any rivalries or history your club has associated with him. Assuming tomorrow he and City come to an agreement with him terminating his contract in exchange for £20m or whatever, he says he's put his issues behind him, and he want to come to your club, and be one of the best paid players at the club, depending on the ability of the players at the club (ie. at Liverpool he would be by far the highest paid, at United maybe 3rd or 4th), a reasonable wage for his talent at any rate, a paycut from what he was on at City.
Would you want your club to sign him for free?
(and no bullshit "Buy him then sell him, lol" answers, you can't do that in the real world.)
Scott wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:Putting aside any rivalries or history your club has associated with him. Assuming tomorrow he and City come to an agreement with him terminating his contract in exchange for £20m or whatever, he says he's put his issues behind him, and he want to come to your club, and be one of the best paid players at the club, depending on the ability of the players at the club (ie. at Liverpool he would be by far the highest paid, at United maybe 3rd or 4th), a reasonable wage for his talent at any rate, a paycut from what he was on at City.
Would you want your club to sign him for free?
(and no bullshit "Buy him then sell him, lol" answers, you can't do that in the real world.)
That was against us ages ago.El_indian wrote:I just read that Scholes once refused to take the field...
SophisticatedBeggar wrote:of course. Probably only Barca, Man U , and Man City fans should say no.