Chris wrote:He fucking won't.Mr Leiva wrote:Carroll gonna score.
Here's proof.. http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/wenger-how-we-ll-counter-andy-carroll
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/latest-news/lucas-knows-key-to-beating-arsenal
Chris wrote:He fucking won't.Mr Leiva wrote:Carroll gonna score.
Here's proof.. http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/wenger-how-we-ll-counter-andy-carroll
Fanatic wrote:Offside trap.Chris wrote:I don't really know what that means because if you get a free-kick from a similar area and then Carroll runs in behind how can we play far from our goal? lol.Fanatic wrote:“Lukasz was a bit surprised by him but the surprise factor will not play any part tomorrow and we will play far from our goal this time.”
Why would he say this sort of stuff?
"brb", calling kenny.
I'm thinking you playing a higher line but that more space for Suarez to run into.
How would that work.. he ran from an onside position.Zlatan wrote:I think he means a high defensive line to stop Carrolls knock downs from being so close to our goal
Chris wrote:Fanatic wrote:Offside trap.Chris wrote:I don't really know what that means because if you get a free-kick from a similar area and then Carroll runs in behind how can we play far from our goal? lol.Fanatic wrote:“Lukasz was a bit surprised by him but the surprise factor will not play any part tomorrow and we will play far from our goal this time.”
Why would he say this sort of stuff?
"brb", calling kenny.
I'm thinking you playing a higher line but that more space for Suarez to run into.How would that work.. he ran from an onside position.Zlatan wrote:I think he means a high defensive line to stop Carrolls knock downs from being so close to our goal
Yeh but because he said about the Fabianski fuckup i was like shut up wenga.Jamie wrote:I assumed he was talking about playing a high line and meant Carroll's threat in general rather than just from set pieces.
VivaRonaldo wrote:Nasri's in the squad
Its only a copy and paste mate.justaddfinesse wrote:Don't even see Nasri playing tbh.
Chris, those facts are so up and down.. lol
"Arsenal have only won just two of their last 12 Premier League matches."
damn.
ClarkY wrote:That makes no sense.
ClarkY wrote:That makes no sense.
NZG wrote:ClarkY wrote:That makes no sense.
Welcome to the life Viva
ClarkY wrote:That makes no sense.
ViVaRooney wrote:come on arsenal, if they win they will lose against us next week
if they lose they will beat us
ClarkY wrote:That makes no sense.
ClarkY wrote:NZG wrote:ClarkY wrote:That makes no sense.
Welcome to the life Viva
Both of them
Scouser_Dave wrote:ViVaRooney wrote:come on arsenal, if they win they will lose against us next week
if they lose they will beat us
Or they could just lose both
Bye_Ya wrote:ClarkY wrote:That makes no sense.
Technically it can make sense, if there is some law of averages in play that wants to swing Arsenal's record back to the win or loss column. But technically 50/50 odds are never actually 50/50, etc.
ViVaRooney wrote:Scouser_Dave wrote:ViVaRooney wrote:come on arsenal, if they win they will lose against us next week
if they lose they will beat us
Or they could just lose both
so you can see arsenal having 1 point after 3 games? it just doesnt happen
Impossible Dave, can't win 2 games in a row, can't lose 2 games in a row.Scouser_Dave wrote:ViVaRooney wrote:come on arsenal, if they win they will lose against us next week
if they lose they will beat us
Or they could just lose both
ViVaRooney wrote:Scouser_Dave wrote:ViVaRooney wrote:come on arsenal, if they win they will lose against us next week
if they lose they will beat us
Or they could just lose both
so you can see arsenal having 1 point after 3 games? it just doesnt happen
kyro7 wrote:Impossible Dave, can't win 2 games in a row, can't lose 2 games in a row.Scouser_Dave wrote:ViVaRooney wrote:come on arsenal, if they win they will lose against us next week
if they lose they will beat us
Or they could just lose both