[42%] [58%] 
Yah, I reckon he could get them to the playoffs for these reasons alone, but Fergie has never had instant success like Dan said. He needs to build a team and the players need to learn his ideology first. Coventry would not be winning the Championship no, but I think he could get them to the playoffs.James wrote:I reckon so. Championship is a close league overall and all you need is good team spirit and a manager that knows what he is doing tactics wise.
CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
CollieBuddz wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Chelsea broke Man U's dominance when they vastly outspent Fergie. City are still getting their act together, once the dust has settled they'll overtake Ferguson's United.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Re: If you put Fergie in charge of Coventry by Uncle John from Jamaica Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:58 am
SpiritOfShankly wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Since Fergie has been manager i very much doubt Chelsea and Man City have spent more than him the fact they have done it over a few seasons rather than 20 years means Fk all.
fergiesrednose wrote:SpiritOfShankly wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Since Fergie has been manager i very much doubt Chelsea and Man City have spent more than him the fact they have done it over a few seasons rather than 20 years means Fk all.
from what i've read liverpool spent shed loads in the 60's and 70's as well and paid the biggest wages.
Can we go back to 1986 and give him the Coventry job.fergiesrednose wrote:give him 3-4 years not only would he get you promoted but he'd kick start your youth programme as well.
CollieBuddz wrote:fergiesrednose wrote:SpiritOfShankly wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Since Fergie has been manager i very much doubt Chelsea and Man City have spent more than him the fact they have done it over a few seasons rather than 20 years means Fk all.
from what i've read liverpool spent shed loads in the 60's and 70's as well and paid the biggest wages.
Bullshit. I absolutely refuse to believe you can read.
fergiesrednose wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:fergiesrednose wrote:SpiritOfShankly wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Since Fergie has been manager i very much doubt Chelsea and Man City have spent more than him the fact they have done it over a few seasons rather than 20 years means Fk all.
from what i've read liverpool spent shed loads in the 60's and 70's as well and paid the biggest wages.
Bullshit. I absolutely refuse to believe you can read.
when i said read I meant I saw a book and it had a lot of pictures........still couldnt understand the fuckin thing
im so stupid I heard the telephone go and I picked up the iron!!!
It happens. Re: If you put Fergie in charge of Coventry by ResurrectionRooney Tue Jul 12, 2011 6:09 am
CollieBuddz wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Chelsea broke Man U's dominance when they vastly outspent Fergie. City are still getting their act together, once the dust has settled they'll overtake Ferguson's United.
Not totally sure about the 60, and 70,s wages but they spent a few quid, But in the 80,s going abroad esecially Italy thats where the big cash was.fergiesrednose wrote:SpiritOfShankly wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Since Fergie has been manager i very much doubt Chelsea and Man City have spent more than him the fact they have done it over a few seasons rather than 20 years means Fk all.
from what i've read liverpool spent shed loads in the 60's and 70's as well and paid the biggest wages.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Chelsea broke Man U's dominance when they vastly outspent Fergie. City are still getting their act together, once the dust has settled they'll overtake Ferguson's United.
Since Abramovich bought Chelsea, United have won more League titles than Chelsea. Also, since the Arab money flowed into Manchester City, United have won more League titles than them. This despite being outspend over those periods. Don't let facts get in the way of a good trolling though.
fergiesrednose wrote:SpiritOfShankly wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Since Fergie has been manager i very much doubt Chelsea and Man City have spent more than him the fact they have done it over a few seasons rather than 20 years means Fk all.
from what i've read liverpool spent shed loads in the 60's and 70's as well and paid the biggest wages.
CollieBuddz wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:ResurrectionRooney wrote:CollieBuddz wrote:Doubt it. Fergie's main skill as a manager is how to use more cash than your rivals have.
Like Chelsea and Manchester City you mean?
Chelsea broke Man U's dominance when they vastly outspent Fergie. City are still getting their act together, once the dust has settled they'll overtake Ferguson's United.
Since Abramovich bought Chelsea, United have won more League titles than Chelsea. Also, since the Arab money flowed into Manchester City, United have won more League titles than them. This despite being outspend over those periods. Don't let facts get in the way of a good trolling though.
Like the facts that no manager at Chelsea has been given a proper chance to build their team except maybe Mourinho. Which I also think while he was at Chelsea they won more titles then United.
Put it this way, if the same amount of money had gone into Chelsea, but from a different, more understanding owner, I think Chelsea would be out of your sights by now.
Like I said with City, the money has just come in and they're doing things a bit differently to Chelsea. They've made constant progress since the money came in, and I think once they get that first title there'll be a lot more to follow.
dena wrote:People have called for the demise of United numerous times over the years and this just sounds like another one of those 'one of these days...' things
|
|
|
