If Henry had the pace of Shearer would he have been...

ZlatanFabregas wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

ZlatanFabregas wrote:I voted yes, not because I'm biased, but because Henry was an amazing player, if he didn't have his pace, I don't see why he wouldn't have been able to adapt his game from a young age and just be a player that made his name in and around the penalty area, like RvN.

A player like Ruud isn't as good as a player like Henry though. Not as good = team less successful.

Ok... So if Henry is a better player = more successful

Fine Shagger wrote:

ZlatanFabregas wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

ZlatanFabregas wrote:I voted yes, not because I'm biased, but because Henry was an amazing player, if he didn't have his pace, I don't see why he wouldn't have been able to adapt his game from a young age and just be a player that made his name in and around the penalty area, like RvN.

A player like Ruud isn't as good as a player like Henry though. Not as good = team less successful.

Ok... So if Henry is a better player = more successful

Obviously. Henry without pace isn't a better player than Henry with pace though.

ZlatanFabregas wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

ZlatanFabregas wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

ZlatanFabregas wrote:I voted yes, not because I'm biased, but because Henry was an amazing player, if he didn't have his pace, I don't see why he wouldn't have been able to adapt his game from a young age and just be a player that made his name in and around the penalty area, like RvN.

A player like Ruud isn't as good as a player like Henry though. Not as good = team less successful.

Ok... So if Henry is a better player = more successful

Obviously. Henry without pace isn't a better player than Henry with pace though.

I know that, but he could have adapted his game to play a different role.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Do you still think Gerrard is better than Iniesta by the way?

kyro7 wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Do you still think Gerrard is better than Iniesta by the way?

Not right now, but at his best Gerrard > Iniesta.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Do you still think Gerrard is better than Iniesta by the way?

Not right now, but at his best Gerrard > Iniesta.

Fine Shagger wrote:As an all round player is a bit of a stupid phrase through.

Zzonked wrote:Of course he wouldn't as successful as he was if you're only taking something away from his game.

Would Messi be as successful as he is if he had no feet?

chiboygeorge wrote:Don't care what team it is, Iniesta always > Gerrard.

Dan wrote:

chiboygeorge wrote:Don't care what team it is, Iniesta always > Gerrard.

Gerrard at RB > Iniesta at RB.

kyro7 wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:Do you still think Gerrard is better than Iniesta by the way?

Not right now, but at his best Gerrard > Iniesta.

dena wrote:Henry has no speed right now and is busting it in MLS so yes.



Oof, don't hurt em'

mauro=beast wrote:of course he wouldnt be as good if no pace

but he he had many other good things also

but it could be likely that he would not even be a striker. henry was winger originally. was consider a 'quick' wide player. so evn if he had no pace then, maybe he could of being a centre midfield player

Fine Shagger wrote:

mauro=beast wrote:of course he wouldnt be as good if no pace

but he he had many other good things also

but it could be likely that he would not even be a striker. henry was winger originally. was consider a 'quick' wide player. so evn if he had no pace then, maybe he could of being a centre midfield player

Mauro, king of all beastings, I believe you have made a mistake in your list.

Eternal Witcher should be on it instead of The-Reporter, who is already there as Chris.

Sean wrote:Its a retirement league

dena wrote:

Sean wrote:Its a retirement league

Lower average age than the EPL


























Don't ask for a source.

Chris wrote:Jamie i suggest you make 56.6 posts per day.