[75%] [25%] 
SBSP wrote:Nasri is much better than Modric IMO.
Steadman wrote:Nothing on Anderson though.
Would be better to switch Modric and Gerrard.Mr Leiva wrote:SBSP wrote:Nasri is much better than Modric IMO.Lucas -- Gerrard
Suarez -- Modric -- Mata
Carroll
I wish, eh
Steadman wrote:Nothing on Anderson though.
I don't agree with that, I'd swap Modric and Gerrard around, put Suarez up front, get rid of Carroll and put someone else there.Mr Leiva wrote:SBSP wrote:Nasri is much better than Modric IMO.Lucas -- Gerrard
Suarez -- Modric -- Mata
Carroll
I wish, eh
Fuck you.Steadman wrote:Would be better to switch Modric and Gerrard.
I was going to post the same thingSteadman wrote:Nothing on Anderson though.
Great minds think alike?kyro7 wrote:Fuck you.Steadman wrote:Would be better to switch Modric and Gerrard.
2 for 1.Kuled wrote:I was going to post the same thingSteadman wrote:Nothing on Anderson though.
inb4lukesays "fools seldom differ".Steadman wrote:Great minds think alike?kyro7 wrote:Fuck you.Steadman wrote:Would be better to switch Modric and Gerrard.
Luke can go fuck his ginger self.kyro7 wrote:inb4lukesays "fools seldom differ".Steadman wrote:Great minds think alike?kyro7 wrote:Fuck you.Steadman wrote:Would be better to switch Modric and Gerrard.
Fools seldom differ.kyro7 wrote:inb4lukesays "fools seldom differ".Steadman wrote:Great minds think alike?kyro7 wrote:Fuck you.Steadman wrote:Would be better to switch Modric and Gerrard.
Steadman wrote:Luke can go fuck his ginger self.kyro7 wrote:inb4lukesays "fools seldom differ".Steadman wrote:Great minds think alike?kyro7 wrote:Fuck you.Steadman wrote:Would be better to switch Modric and Gerrard.
blackskar wrote:Steadman wrote:Luke can go fuck his ginger self.kyro7 wrote:inb4lukesays "fools seldom differ".Steadman wrote:Great minds think alike?kyro7 wrote:Fuck you.
Racist
I remember you saying you thought he was better. I also remember the people that thought I was mad for saying Nasri was better.kyro7 wrote:I guarantee if you look back to the thread you made, you'd find me saying Nasri is better.AriseForLife wrote:I remember when I started the Nasri v Modric thread on the old boards and people argued around the moon why Modric is better, but now more people are seeing Nasri is a beast.kyro7 wrote:I'd take Modric ahead of Nasri at United, but I think Nasri is more complete.
I can understand why some would prefer Modric, he is playing in his natural position and doing well, but if Nasri were played in the middle for Arsenal I think he would be a 10-15 goals scorer and 10-15 assists per season easy.
I still don't agree that Modric is a better passer. Part of that could be my bias and that I have seen a hell of a lot more Nasri than Modic considering I have been following him for a while.kyro7 wrote:
The only reason why people think Modric is better is because Nasri hasn't had much of a chance with Fabregas in the side, he hasn't been the main man, but look at times he was, Porto for example, he's a much better all round player, the only thing Modric has on him is passing, but Nasri is still a good passer.
Don't get me wrong, Modric is class, but I see Nasri more as an all round complete player, Modric's passing is sexy though.
That was my post in your thread.
SBSP wrote:Nasri vs Porto.
He was on some king-shit filling in for Fabregas.
Steadman wrote:Thiago is the clear winner.
|
|
|
