ResurrectionRooney wrote:If you've never had a dog you can evaluate them objectively, as simple beasts.
Then we need to make this poll fair.......a list pre-determined by Mauro of human beasts must be made.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:If you've never had a dog you can evaluate them objectively, as simple beasts.
Do you have evidence to back this up?ResurrectionRooney wrote:polska. wrote:Nice RR. When I play your game against you, you hide.polska. wrote:You are avoiding the topic RR. Considering we have connections to humans, how does lacking connections to animals make you less biased when answering the poll?
Fuck you, I'm a busy man.
Humans have more distinct personalities than animals, when you're envisaging this scenario you'll be thinking of some random person, and a load of dogs. The random person, you know has a different personality to anyone you know, because humans have such varied personalities, so you'll have no attachment to it. The dogs on the other hand, we imprint all sorts of characteristics onto them, such as loyalty and 'innocence', if you've been very close to dogs, and they'll all appeared to be very nice to you (very likely if you feed them) you're going to imprint similar characteristics into the ones you should shoot.
If you've never had a dog you can evaluate them objectively, as simple beasts.
Kuled wrote:
How the fuck can I shoot her. Makes me sad just thinking about it.
SBSP wrote:Depends how they get tortured.
polska. wrote:Do you have evidence to back this up?ResurrectionRooney wrote:polska. wrote:Nice RR. When I play your game against you, you hide.polska. wrote:You are avoiding the topic RR. Considering we have connections to humans, how does lacking connections to animals make you less biased when answering the poll?
Fuck you, I'm a busy man.
Humans have more distinct personalities than animals, when you're envisaging this scenario you'll be thinking of some random person, and a load of dogs. The random person, you know has a different personality to anyone you know, because humans have such varied personalities, so you'll have no attachment to it. The dogs on the other hand, we imprint all sorts of characteristics onto them, such as loyalty and 'innocence', if you've been very close to dogs, and they'll all appeared to be very nice to you (very likely if you feed them) you're going to imprint similar characteristics into the ones you should shoot.
If you've never had a dog you can evaluate them objectively, as simple beasts.
I still wouldn't shoot them.NZG wrote:Kuled wrote:
How the fuck can I shoot her. Makes me sad just thinking about it.
I was thinking of these ones
Fuck i'm a monster
Zzonked wrote:Forest wrote:10 dogs everytime. Fucking hate animals. Still think it's wrong, but i'd prefer than than a human
Why?
polska. wrote:You've never had a pet so stfu.Forest wrote:10 dogs everytime. Fucking hate animals. Still think it's wrong, but i'd prefer than than a human
Forest wrote:Zzonked wrote:Forest wrote:10 dogs everytime. Fucking hate animals. Still think it's wrong, but i'd prefer than than a human
Why?
They're just dirty and make a mess and too much effort to keep. They're like dirty babies but you've still gotta clean they're shit up as they get older, unlike babies.
Get a poodle?Forest wrote:I'd rather live in a clean home where i'm not covered in hairs, a home that doesn't stink of dog, and i'd like all my clothes to not be covered in hairs too.
polska. wrote:Get a poodle?Forest wrote:I'd rather live in a clean home where i'm not covered in hairs, a home that doesn't stink of dog, and i'd like all my clothes to not be covered in hairs too.
polska. wrote:Humans are worthless pests.
As long as I have no attachment to that human, I honestly couldn't give a fuck.
Whilst with dogs I got the puppy effect. Awww Puppies!
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Strangle, I make my decisions based on logic, not on emotional decisions over what's cute.
ResurrectionRooney wrote:Doesn't matter either way to me.