Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


+9
easley91
Barton
menalawyerguy
Drake
CollieBuddz
Ben 10
luke.
Lux
ShakerMatty
13 posters

    Crawley= scum

    ShakerMatty
    ShakerMatty
     
     


    Formerly known as : Burytillidie
    Posts : 13609
    Age : 28
    Location : Mancunian way
    Supports : Bury and Salford RLFC

    Crawley= scum Empty Crawley= scum

    Post by ShakerMatty Mon May 30, 2011 11:21 pm

    another player they want
    http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12040_6926699,00.html
    the only way they have made it up to league 2 is Money FACT
    and they will try to get promoted again by buying more players.
    pisses me off teams like these.
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 31
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Lux Mon May 30, 2011 11:22 pm

    The only way any team moves up the league is money. Even Blackpool bought players to get into the Premier League.

    If you don't spend, you can't improve your squad.


    Last edited by Lux on Mon May 30, 2011 11:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
    luke.
    luke.
     
     


    Posts : 32310
    Age : 29
    Location : Belfast

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by luke. Mon May 30, 2011 11:22 pm

    I think you'll find most teams gain success by spending money. Even Barcelona.
    Ben 10
    Ben 10
     
     


    Posts : 10205
    Age : 28
    Location : Preston
    Supports : Preston North End F.C.

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Ben 10 Mon May 30, 2011 11:23 pm

    I don't see how they are scum for spending money. How else are they going to move up the Football League pyramid?
    ShakerMatty
    ShakerMatty
     
     


    Formerly known as : Burytillidie
    Posts : 13609
    Age : 28
    Location : Mancunian way
    Supports : Bury and Salford RLFC

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by ShakerMatty Mon May 30, 2011 11:23 pm

    yes but they are just buying every player Neutral
    CollieBuddz
    CollieBuddz
     
     


    Posts : 3473
    Age : 33

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by CollieBuddz Mon May 30, 2011 11:24 pm

    I think what he means is, they spend money which the club hasn't made.
    ShakerMatty
    ShakerMatty
     
     


    Formerly known as : Burytillidie
    Posts : 13609
    Age : 28
    Location : Mancunian way
    Supports : Bury and Salford RLFC

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by ShakerMatty Mon May 30, 2011 11:27 pm

    you have got to admit i bet a lot of you are jealous of city and i am slightly jealous of crawley but id rather make it up the league without buying every bleeding player!!
    they have a 200k striker on the bench ffs
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 31
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Lux Mon May 30, 2011 11:29 pm

    CollieBuddz wrote:I think what he means is, they spend money which the club hasn't made.

    If every team did that, then football would be shit.

    All the big teams started somewhere, and spent money that the fans didn't have.

    I'm glad the sustainable rules only affect teams in Europe, if it was universal it'd kill football.

    What does it really matter where the money comes from? Most teams are in debt, if you don't have money from the outside then the money will have to come from somewhere else.....i.e. the fans who will all have to pay more money.

    Anyway, bigger clubs don't deserve an unfair advantage, if anything you'd think they might try and help the smaller teams to make leagues competitive.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Mon May 30, 2011 11:42 pm

    Its nice to see them use there money wisely.
    Drake
    Drake
     
     


    Posts : 16006
    Age : 28

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Drake Mon May 30, 2011 11:43 pm

    Blackburn started this Embarassed
    menalawyerguy
    menalawyerguy
     
     


    Posts : 6547
    Age : 110

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by menalawyerguy Mon May 30, 2011 11:54 pm

    How dare they try to improve their team.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Mon May 30, 2011 11:55 pm

    menalawyerguy wrote:How dare they try to improve their team.

    Fucking disgusting it is. Spending money as well? Bang out of order.
    avatar
    Barton
     
     


    Formerly known as : JMB_94
    Posts : 10066
    Age : 29

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Barton Mon May 30, 2011 11:58 pm

    This thread. Crawley= scum 58503
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Mon May 30, 2011 11:59 pm

    Dan wrote:
    menalawyerguy wrote:How dare they try to improve their team.

    Fucking disgusting it is. Spending money as well? Bang out of order.

    I will be sending a letter to Blatter to sort this mess out! temper
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Mon May 30, 2011 11:59 pm

    JMB_94 wrote:This thread. Crawley= scum 58503


    Thanks for that helpful input. shifty
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Tue May 31, 2011 12:02 am

    Mr Leiva wrote:
    Dan wrote:
    menalawyerguy wrote:How dare they try to improve their team.

    Fucking disgusting it is. Spending money as well? Bang out of order.

    I will be sending a letter to Blatter to sort this mess out! temper

    I don't think that would work. Money isn't Mr Blatter's thing. He's too busy implementing goal-line technology into every ground. He's working hard on it though.
    easley91
    easley91
     
     


    Posts : 4463
    Age : 33
    Location : Crawley
    Supports : Tottenham, Crawley, Lesnar, Brewster, Coppell

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by easley91 Tue May 31, 2011 12:06 am

    I'll say this, it's one thing to have the money, it's another to use it wisely and get a team playing together, which is what we have done. We almost went into administration a couple of years ago thanks to the Majeeds, we had to get rid of most of the squad, which is probably why we bought quite a few players at first because we hardly had a playing squad. I was unsure how I felt at first, delighted that Crawley might do something, but I hated Man City and Chelsea for spending money. Who knows we could spend the money on shit players and players who will upset the dressing room, which will lead to crap performances and team morale. By the way you can add the money from the FA Cup run, which we earned fair and square beating Swindon, Torquay and Derby and taking United all the way at Old Trafford.

    Let me ask you this: how would you feel if your club were given money without the problem of any debt? You'd be delighted just like City and Chelsea fans were. It'll make you a hypocrite, and I'm probably one myself.
    easley91
    easley91
     
     


    Posts : 4463
    Age : 33
    Location : Crawley
    Supports : Tottenham, Crawley, Lesnar, Brewster, Coppell

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by easley91 Tue May 31, 2011 12:09 am

    I actually expected a thread like this on here eventually after the promotion. It was inevitable.
    RubyArmyCTFC
    RubyArmyCTFC
     
     


    Posts : 2240
    Location : Cheltenham
    Supports : Cheltenham Town

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by RubyArmyCTFC Tue May 31, 2011 12:10 am

    Being honest. Crawley have hardly explained where their money is coming from. Also their manager Steve Evans is a former crook who cheated the tax man at Boston.
    easley91
    easley91
     
     


    Posts : 4463
    Age : 33
    Location : Crawley
    Supports : Tottenham, Crawley, Lesnar, Brewster, Coppell

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by easley91 Tue May 31, 2011 12:15 am

    It's come from English (or British not sure, read an article ages ago Crawley= scum 214775) investors based overseas. I'll see if I can find it again and dig it up.
    menalawyerguy
    menalawyerguy
     
     


    Posts : 6547
    Age : 110

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by menalawyerguy Tue May 31, 2011 12:21 am

    Dan wrote:
    Mr Leiva wrote:
    Dan wrote:
    menalawyerguy wrote:How dare they try to improve their team.

    Fucking disgusting it is. Spending money as well? Bang out of order.

    I will be sending a letter to Blatter to sort this mess out! Crawley= scum 817687

    I don't think that would work. Money isn't Mr Blatter's thing. He's too busy implementing goal-line technology into every ground. He's working hard on it though.

    Careful. You don't want this thread to turn into being about goal-line tech. Mods might lock it. Rolling Eyes
    RubyArmyCTFC
    RubyArmyCTFC
     
     


    Posts : 2240
    Location : Cheltenham
    Supports : Cheltenham Town

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by RubyArmyCTFC Tue May 31, 2011 12:46 am

    easley91 wrote:It's come from English (or British not sure, read an article ages ago Crawley= scum 214775) investors based overseas. I'll see if I can find it again and dig it up.

    Did those investors used to live in the the Sussex area or support Crawley? I mean no disrespect to Crawley but I don't see why someone would want to invest millions into a club Crawley's size when before last season, they were nothing more than an average Conference club getting 1500 gates.

    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Tue May 31, 2011 12:54 am

    CTFC~ced wrote:
    easley91 wrote:It's come from English (or British not sure, read an article ages ago Crawley= scum 214775) investors based overseas. I'll see if I can find it again and dig it up.

    Did those investors used to live in the the Sussex area or support Crawley? I mean no disrespect to Crawley but I don't see why someone would want to invest millions into a club Crawley's size when before last season, they were nothing more than an average Conference club getting 1500 gates.


    Think of the profit if they get them further up the football league.
    menalawyerguy
    menalawyerguy
     
     


    Posts : 6547
    Age : 110

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by menalawyerguy Tue May 31, 2011 12:56 am

    CTFC~ced wrote:Being honest. Crawley have hardly explained where their money is coming from.

    Are they required to?
    Lux
    Lux
     
     


    Posts : 9892
    Age : 31
    Location : North West London
    Supports : Watford FC

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Lux Tue May 31, 2011 12:58 am

    Being self reliant gets you nowhere.

    Watford are one of the few self reliant clubs in the Championship....and any time we get a good player we have to sell him because if we don't we'll go into administration.
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Tue May 31, 2011 1:00 am

    menalawyerguy wrote:
    CTFC~ced wrote:Being honest. Crawley have hardly explained where their money is coming from.

    Are they required to?

    To the FA and Football League. They seem satisfied with where it's from.
    RubyArmyCTFC
    RubyArmyCTFC
     
     


    Posts : 2240
    Location : Cheltenham
    Supports : Cheltenham Town

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by RubyArmyCTFC Tue May 31, 2011 1:02 am

    easley91 wrote:
    Let me ask you this: how would you feel if your club were given money without the problem of any debt? You'd be delighted just like City and Chelsea fans were. It'll make you a hypocrite, and I'm probably one myself.

    I'd rather know where the money is coming from first. You've seen the likes of Rushden who spent heavily on short term success and are now back to their sustainable position.

    A couple of years ago at Cheltenham we had a director worth £966 million who was actually one of the wealthiest men in British football. Unfortunately he left when Marin Allen started spending a massive amount of money expecting Keswick to bail him out. When he left our squad was put up for sale and we were that close to administration.

    All I'm saying is that Crawley should be careful and not risk the future of the club for short term success. We tried and failed, Histon tried and failed, Boston tried and failed and Rushden tried and failed. When these investors get bored then Crawley are pretty much fucked as you can't afford to pay League one/Championship wages with a 2500 average crowd.

    easley91
    easley91
     
     


    Posts : 4463
    Age : 33
    Location : Crawley
    Supports : Tottenham, Crawley, Lesnar, Brewster, Coppell

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by easley91 Tue May 31, 2011 1:03 am

    Dan wrote:
    menalawyerguy wrote:
    CTFC~ced wrote:Being honest. Crawley have hardly explained where their money is coming from.

    Are they required to?

    To the FA and Football League. They seem satisfied with where it's from.

    As far as I know they don't have to be revealed to the public but only to the FA and Football League. Not sure on that so don't quote me on it.
    RubyArmyCTFC
    RubyArmyCTFC
     
     


    Posts : 2240
    Location : Cheltenham
    Supports : Cheltenham Town

    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by RubyArmyCTFC Tue May 31, 2011 1:04 am

    Dan wrote:
    CTFC~ced wrote:
    easley91 wrote:It's come from English (or British not sure, read an article ages ago Crawley= scum 214775) investors based overseas. I'll see if I can find it again and dig it up.

    Did those investors used to live in the the Sussex area or support Crawley? I mean no disrespect to Crawley but I don't see why someone would want to invest millions into a club Crawley's size when before last season, they were nothing more than an average Conference club getting 1500 gates.


    Think of the profit if they get them further up the football league.

    Then surely the likes of Wrexham or Luton would have been a more ambitious club to take charge of?
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Guest Tue May 31, 2011 1:05 am

    easley91 wrote:
    Dan wrote:
    menalawyerguy wrote:
    CTFC~ced wrote:Being honest. Crawley have hardly explained where their money is coming from.

    Are they required to?

    To the FA and Football League. They seem satisfied with where it's from.

    As far as I know they don't have to be revealed to the public but only to the FA and Football League. Not sure on that so don't quote me on it.

    I think that's about right mate.

    Sponsored content


    Crawley= scum Empty Re: Crawley= scum

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon Apr 29, 2024 12:40 am