Who would you prefer?
+11
Coatsy
The Zlatan
Jordi
ResurrectionRooney
Steadman
dena
Scouser_Dave
Theo Filippo
Cadbury
Kuled
CollieBuddz
15 posters
Valencia vs Walcott
Poll
Who?
- [ 21 ]
[81%]
- [ 5 ]
- [19%]
Total Votes: 26
CollieBuddz-
- Posts : 3473
Age : 34
Kuled-
- Posts : 55235
Age : 28
Valencia.
Cadbury-
- Posts : 23487
Age : 30
Location : Blackpool
Supports : Not Kenny.
Valencia can cross, so him.
Guest- Guest
For me Walcott is not a winger, striker.
Walcott could be so lethal in front of goal, but as a right winger I'd take Valencia easily.
Walcott could be so lethal in front of goal, but as a right winger I'd take Valencia easily.
Theo Filippo-
- Formerly known as : Filippo Inzaghi
Posts : 21636
Age : 30
Valencia for me
Scouser_Dave-
- Posts : 7498
Valencia.
Guest- Guest
Valencia
Walcott on his day can be better but he is so inconsistent! he has 1 good game and 11 bad games
Walcott on his day can be better but he is so inconsistent! he has 1 good game and 11 bad games
dena-
- Posts : 18688
Age : 35
Location : only place to find base heads and hot women
Mr. Angry fo sho'
Steadman-
- Posts : 6134
Age : 32
Location : London
Supports : I have humor, yes.
Valencia as a wide man, Theo should be playing upfront with van Persie behind him.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
Valencia is a good player, Walcott isn't, no brains.
Jordi- .
- Posts : 36039
Age : 29
Supports : Saints
Walcott is deployed best as a striker IMO.
On the wing, Valencia.
On the wing, Valencia.
The Zlatan-
- Posts : 10347
Valencia
But Walcott should be up front.
But Walcott should be up front.
Steadman-
- Posts : 6134
Age : 32
Location : London
Supports : I have humor, yes.
That clearly isn't true.ResurrectionRooney wrote:Valencia is a good player, Walcott isn't, no brains.
Coatsy-
- Posts : 3189
Age : 31
Valencia on the wing, Walcott upfront shame he doesn't get enough chances their.
Jord-
- Formerly known as : SUPAH BURNLEY!
Posts : 33665
Location : Equestria
Supports : Liverpool FC
Walcott if played as a striker.
Ricardo-
- Posts : 4561
Age : 30
Location : London
Valencia is obviously better on the wing, but Walcott's best position isn't the wing and Valencia's is.
ResurrectionRooney-
- Posts : 17681
Supports : United
If Walcott is such a good striker why does Bendtner have an Arsenal career?
Coatsy-
- Posts : 3189
Age : 31
Fuck knows.ResurrectionRooney wrote:If Walcott is such a good striker why does Bendtner have an Arsenal career?
Steadman-
- Posts : 6134
Age : 32
Location : London
Supports : I have humor, yes.
He doesn't.ResurrectionRooney wrote:If Walcott is such a good striker why does Bendtner have an Arsenal career?
dena-
- Posts : 18688
Age : 35
Location : only place to find base heads and hot women
Is Walcott a better striker than Valencia is a winger? I know it's hard to determine because a) Walcott hasnt gotten an opportunity to play ST full time b) two different positions, but I'd be inclined to say no... I think Valencia has probably been the most effective winger in England the past two years...
Then again I just debunked my own argument so
Then again I just debunked my own argument so
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 32
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
Valencia by a miler. Better all round player, the only thing Walcott has over him is pace (and I guess he's a neat finisher too) but Valencia is quick anyway.
Fanatic-
- Posts : 4855
I don't care about this positioning malarky, If I had to choose the better player, I would choose Valencia.
|
|
|