Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


+12
ESSIENblaster
blackskar
Sam
Ryan Giggs
Mouse
L1savage
The-Exploited
Bushido
crump
Jordi
Walcott
Kuled
16 posters

    So much for the "new invincibles"

    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:42 am

    rofl
    Walcott
    Walcott
     
     


    Posts : 14547
    Location : at the stewards with Lewis Hamilton.
    Supports : Arsenal & Lewis Hamilton.

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Walcott Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:46 am

    Don't understand why Ancelotti bought Sturridge on for Drogba when they needed a goal either.. lol.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:47 am

    I laughed my arse off did you see drogba's reaction? Laughing Ancelotti doing a Benitez...
    Walcott
    Walcott
     
     


    Posts : 14547
    Location : at the stewards with Lewis Hamilton.
    Supports : Arsenal & Lewis Hamilton.

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Walcott Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:50 am

    Kuled wrote:I laughed my arse off did you see drogba's reaction? Laughing Ancelotti doing a Benitez...
    Im not too bothered, makes us (as in Arsenal and United) closer to Chelsea! So much for the "new invincibles"  876268
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Guest Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:50 am

    Kuled wrote:I laughed my arse off did you see drogba's reaction? So much for the "new invincibles"  Icon_lol Ancelotti doing a Benitez...

    Drogba's not injured though.. So much for the "new invincibles"  28973
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:52 am

    Dan wrote:
    Kuled wrote:I laughed my arse off did you see drogba's reaction? So much for the "new invincibles"  Icon_lol Ancelotti doing a Benitez...

    Drogba's not injured though.. So much for the "new invincibles"  28973
    So what your saying is..Ancelotti is worse than Benitez? shifty
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Guest Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:56 am

    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:
    Kuled wrote:I laughed my arse off did you see drogba's reaction? So much for the "new invincibles"  Icon_lol Ancelotti doing a Benitez...

    Drogba's not injured though.. So much for the "new invincibles"  28973
    So what your saying is..Ancelotti is worse than Benitez? So much for the "new invincibles"  279869

    No. Did you not see the papers last season? Rafa is the worst manager in the world and is the reason that we are £237m in debt with all his rubbish buys like Torres, Agger, Reina and Mascherano still playing and losing to Northampton because of his damn defensive football and zonal marking.



    Neutral
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:58 am

    Dan wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:
    Kuled wrote:I laughed my arse off did you see drogba's reaction? So much for the "new invincibles"  Icon_lol Ancelotti doing a Benitez...

    Drogba's not injured though.. So much for the "new invincibles"  28973
    So what your saying is..Ancelotti is worse than Benitez? So much for the "new invincibles"  279869

    No. Did you not see the papers last season? Rafa is the worst manager in the world and is the reason that we are £237m in debt with all his rubbish buys like Torres, Agger, Reina and Mascherano still playing and losing to Northampton because of his damn defensive football and zonal marking.



    Neutral
    Tell me about it and the idiot bought aquilani when he had like 40 mil rofl At least he had some sense in his head to sell that shithead Alonso
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Guest Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:00 am

    I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Jordi
    Jordi
    .
    .


    Posts : 36039
    Age : 28
    Supports : Saints

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Jordi Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:05 am

    rofl
    crump
    crump
     
     


    Posts : 20116

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by crump Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:12 am

    Aquilani was/is terrible. He's so shit at making signings Rafa is.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:12 am

    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Guest Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:18 am

    atastycrumpet wrote:Aquilani was/is terrible. He's so shit at making signings Rafa is.

    I seriously hope that's sarcasm. Otherwise I'm not going to be held responsible for my actions.. Neutral
    Bushido
    Bushido
     
     


    Posts : 4577

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Bushido Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:19 am

    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty

    Kuled you watch Chelsea more than you do United.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:21 am

    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty

    Kuled you watch Chelsea more than you do United.
    I think I only watched 2 chelsea games
    the first one and this one
    Bushido
    Bushido
     
     


    Posts : 4577

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Bushido Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:22 am

    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty

    Kuled you watch Chelsea more than you do United.
    I think I only watched 2 chelsea games
    the first one and this one

    You didn;t watch your game v Liverpool HAHA.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:23 am

    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty

    Kuled you watch Chelsea more than you do United.
    I think I only watched 2 chelsea games
    the first one and this one

    You didn;t watch your game v Liverpool HAHA.
    So?
    Bushido
    Bushido
     
     


    Posts : 4577

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Bushido Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:25 am

    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty

    Kuled you watch Chelsea more than you do United.
    I think I only watched 2 chelsea games
    the first one and this one

    You didn;t watch your game v Liverpool HAHA.
    So?

    ..... Well you go on about United this United that yet you don't even watch them, you are the definition of a shit fan.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:27 am

    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty

    Kuled you watch Chelsea more than you do United.
    I think I only watched 2 chelsea games
    the first one and this one

    You didn;t watch your game v Liverpool HAHA.
    So?

    ..... Well you go on about United this United that yet you don't even watch them, you are the definition of a shit fan.
    Because I was outside in a 5 star hotel at the pool Neutral
    Bushido
    Bushido
     
     


    Posts : 4577

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Bushido Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:28 am

    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Nightmare wrote:
    Kuled wrote:
    Dan wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.. Neutral
    Of course I'm being sarcastic shifty

    Kuled you watch Chelsea more than you do United.
    I think I only watched 2 chelsea games
    the first one and this one

    You didn;t watch your game v Liverpool HAHA.
    So?

    ..... Well you go on about United this United that yet you don't even watch them, you are the definition of a shit fan.
    Because I was outside in a 5 star hotel at the pool Neutral

    HAHAHAHAHAHA sure you where.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:32 am

    So much for the "new invincibles"  LogoNeutral
    Bushido
    Bushido
     
     


    Posts : 4577

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Bushido Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:34 am

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Al_gore_excelsior

    How does that prove you where on holiday btw?

    Couldn't you find a pub or a radio with the match on? kind of a big match, wouldn;t be hard to watch due to the both teams huge fan bases.. hmm shit fan.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:38 am

    My friend was keeping me posted from my phone































    LOLZZZZZZZZZZ LIARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR LMFAO U R SOOO SHIT @ LYING rofl



    Neutral
    The-Exploited
    The-Exploited
     
     


    Posts : 70
    Age : 35
    Supports : Dark

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by The-Exploited Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:45 am

    Not one decent Chelsea fan ever said we were the "new invincibles" in fact it was what outsiders kept saying. Get over yourself you twat. You seem to talk more about Chelsea than about your own team, just like some of your other fans do about Liverpool.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:47 am

    You don't have allot of "decent chelsea fans" now do you? Laughing
    Anonymous
    Guest
    Guest


    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Guest Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:49 am

    Ger over it. You're so obsessed with Chelsea.
    Bushido
    Bushido
     
     


    Posts : 4577

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Bushido Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:55 am

    Kuled wrote:You don't have allot of "decent chelsea fans" now do you? Laughing

    You don't even watch your team, you sit at the pool of 5 star hotels, great fan you.
    avatar
    Kuled
     
     


    Posts : 55235
    Age : 27

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Kuled Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:59 am

    The only game I didn't watch in years makes me a bad fan? I didn't want to argue with my mother to go back home just to watch the game so I let it slide..on another day I would have begged her to take me back home but I wanted to swim that day.
    And fuck off I haven't done anything to you and you're completely obsessed with my posts.
    avatar
    L1savage
     
     


    Posts : 43
    Location : Salford
    Supports : Dirty, slapstick.

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by L1savage Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:02 am

    Kuled wrote:The only game I didn't watch in years makes me a bad fan? I didn't want to argue with my mother to go back home just to watch the game so I let it slide..on another day I would have begged her to take me back home but I wanted to swim that day.
    And fuck off I haven't done anything to you and you're completely obsessed with my posts.

    well i was giving my opinion on chelsea and you butted in on something irrelevant and i didnt batter an eyelid.
    The-Exploited
    The-Exploited
     
     


    Posts : 70
    Age : 35
    Supports : Dark

    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by The-Exploited Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:08 am

    Kuled wrote:You don't have allot of "decent chelsea fans" now do you? Laughing
    I'm sure it's a bigger number than the decent United fans surely.

    Sponsored content


    So much for the "new invincibles"  Empty Re: So much for the "new invincibles"

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu May 09, 2024 2:29 am