Best U21 PL team

arsenalap11 wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

Scuba Steve wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scuba Steve wrote:

Gibbs with 15 Premier League appearances. Fabio with 14.

He's played in the CL and for England and on loan also. Not to mention that amount would be a lot bigger if it wasn't for injuries.

Gibbs appearances in the CL: 9
Fabio appearances in the CL: 7

Negligible.

And nice of you to mention injuries. Because Fabio has always been fit, amrite? Not to mention that Fabio is a year younger as well.

Scuba just beasted.

Beasted what?

Fabio - 31 games
Gibbs - 47 games

And Gibbs has had a lot worse injuries over the past couple seasons.

Fabio missed the entire 2008/2009 season (minus two cup games).

Fonseca wrote:

TheMooseHunter wrote:McEachran > Ramsey

Serious?

Nope. McEachran not got much experience.

And0TheGr8 wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

And0TheGr8 wrote:Fabio shits all over Gibbs in every aspect of the game, defending, tackling, passing, and attacking...

Stick with eggball

Fucking great game, just ask the 9 Billion dollars that it generates annually.....
Don't be mad that Yanks just dominate you in knowledge of the game of footy.

You don't do your stereotype much good

Scuba Steve wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

Scuba Steve wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

He's played in the CL and for England and on loan also. Not to mention that amount would be a lot bigger if it wasn't for injuries.

Gibbs appearances in the CL: 9
Fabio appearances in the CL: 7

Negligible.

And nice of you to mention injuries. Because Fabio has always been fit, amrite? Not to mention that Fabio is a year younger as well.

Scuba just beasted.

Beasted what?

Fabio - 31 games
Gibbs - 47 games

And Gibbs has had a lot worse injuries over the past couple seasons.

Fabio missed the entire 2008/2009 season (minus two cup games).

Gibbs missed most the 2009/10 season with a broken metatarsal..

N'Gog has played more than Lukaku.


Who is better?

I don't really get it. Regardless of how many times he's played Gibbs has proven he's pisspoor

Same as Armand Traore who all the Arsenal fans were hyping up a while back just because both are fast.

Dan wrote:N'Gog has played more than Lukaku.


Who is better?

N'Gog obviously.

Fine Shagger wrote:I don't really get it. Regardless of how many times he's played Gibbs has proven he's pisspoor

Same as Armand Traore who all the Arsenal fans were hyping up a while back just because both are fast.

No he hasn't proven he's piss pour.. he's slipped up a few times, but he's also shown he is a good player at times. I've watched pretty much his every game so I think i'm in a better position to judge him.

Traore was never a great LB, but he would make a decent LW'er.

Fine Shagger wrote:I don't really get it. Regardless of how many times he's played Gibbs has proven he's pisspoor

Same as Armand Traore who all the Arsenal fans were hyping up a while back just because both are fast.

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

arsenalap11 wrote:

Scuba Steve wrote:

arsenalap11 wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:

Scuba Steve wrote:

Gibbs appearances in the CL: 9
Fabio appearances in the CL: 7

Negligible.

And nice of you to mention injuries. Because Fabio has always been fit, amrite? Not to mention that Fabio is a year younger as well.

Scuba just beasted.

Beasted what?

Fabio - 31 games
Gibbs - 47 games

And Gibbs has had a lot worse injuries over the past couple seasons.

Fabio missed the entire 2008/2009 season (minus two cup games).

Gibbs missed most the 2009/10 season with a broken metatarsal..

So its a wash then....

Fine Shagger wrote:I don't really get it. Regardless of how many times he's played Gibbs has proven he's pisspoor

Same as Armand Traore who all the Arsenal fans were hyping up a while back just because both are fast.

Both beasts it in FIFA.

Fine Shagger wrote:I don't really get it. Regardless of how many times he's played Gibbs has proven he's pisspoor

Same as Armand Traore who all the Arsenal fans were hyping up a while back just because both are fast.

Erm.... na I won't bother

you missed out balotelli

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:you missed out balotelli

He is an animal and i love the guy, but i honestly think I'd rather have Sturridge atm.

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:you missed out balotelli

Average player, who will be playing for a mid table team in two years time. And am not talking about City.

hes miles better than stuttridge plus he can play wide.

Hmm.. yeah Balloteli is a good shout.

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:hes miles better than stuttridge plus he can play wide.

Move Bale to LB, Bao LW. Sorted.

I thought that Ollson guy for Blackburn was 21, was gonna say him.

Balotelli is so many echelons above Sturridge it's crazy that you chose Sturridge. Balo was better 2 years ago than Sturridge is now.

olsson is 22, think hoillet deserves a shout, been quality this season.

I forgot Balotelli at first which is why I left him out but yeah i'd put him in there.

XxBradKennedyxX wrote:olsson is 22, think hoillet deserves a shout, been quality this season.

I agree.

welbeck deserves a shout.

too many players are 22, sandro, walcott, hernandez, carroll, richards, boeteng etc.

You changed Sturridge but not Gibbs.

TheMooseHunter wrote:You changed Sturridge but not Gibbs.

Everyone defending their players

Fonseca wrote:

TheMooseHunter wrote:You changed Sturridge but not Gibbs.

I agree about changing Sturridge, but think Fabio is better than Gibbs.

Kuled wrote:Everyone defending their players

TheMooseHunter wrote:

Fonseca wrote:

TheMooseHunter wrote:You changed Sturridge but not Gibbs.

I agree about changing Sturridge, but think Fabio is better than Gibbs.

As a footballer Balotelli is pretty useless. Attitude stinks the place out, and he ego can't fit through the door. Average player, not technical and just has a bit of pace, strength and can strike the ball well 40% of the time.

He doesn't know how to work as a team, and his passing or lack of passing is piss poor. Overall poor buy for City.