"When at a game"
Smart choice james smart choice
Smart choice james smart choice
+14
dena
Carlos Jenkinson
ayvee1
coolhead33
moscowmadeit3
Scuba Steve
Uncle John from Jamaica
LFC_Grunners
Fanatic
Jord
Sean
Theo Filippo
Jamie
luke.
18 posters
What do you find more entertaining when at a game?
Poll
A or B
- [ 17 ]
[81%]
- [ 4 ]
- [19%]
Total Votes: 21
Carlos Jenkinson-
- Posts : 10964
- Post n°31
Re: What do you find more entertaining when at a game?
by Carlos Jenkinson Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:01 am
dena-
- Posts : 18688
Age : 34
Location : only place to find base heads and hot women
Gotta love a good footballing display, has to be A.
RubyArmyCTFC-
- Posts : 2240
Location : Cheltenham
Supports : Cheltenham Town
- Post n°33
Re: What do you find more entertaining when at a game?
by RubyArmyCTFC Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:15 am
The piss easy win every time. So rare to see us win comfortably.Jameswrote:A) Your team passing the other team off the park and hitting 5 or 6.
or
B) Your team defending a single goal lead for a lengthy period of time while you park the bus?
Personally I find option 2 way more exciting. When City go 3.0 up it all becomes a bit boring knowing the game is in the bag.
This is for people that go to games as watching on a stream is completely different.
Both. Burton Albion last season was a brilliant experience. 2-0 down half time. 90th minute equalizer, 94th minute winnner to win 6-5Radford11 wrote:Q: Last minute winners or a second half comeback from atleast 2 goal down?
.
Guest- Guest
A, definately. More fun and the banter towards the away fans is often better I find
Guest- Guest
A.
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
- Post n°36
Re: What do you find more entertaining when at a game?
by El_indian Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:04 pm
Scuba Steve wrote:James
This is for people that go to games as watching on a stream is completely different.
You should include this in the thread title -- that way, I know to not enter into the thread.
Scuba Steve-
- Posts : 6682
Age : 37
- Post n°37
Re: What do you find more entertaining when at a game?
by Scuba Steve Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:06 pm
To be honest, I'd rather lose B than win A. I love the drama (hate losing, of course).
El_indian-
- Posts : 8448
Location : New Zealand
Supports : funny
- Post n°38
Re: What do you find more entertaining when at a game?
by El_indian Tue Apr 12, 2011 1:10 pm
I think the OP has his wording all wrong.
A is def more entertaining.
with B you get more emotionally involved in the game - it's more intense
A is def more entertaining.
with B you get more emotionally involved in the game - it's more intense
Lux-
- Posts : 9892
Age : 32
Location : North West London
Supports : Watford FC
Hard to say.....we almost never do B....I think I've only seen it once this season (vs Leicester at home)....usually we're the one squandering the lead.
Guest- Guest
James ♠ wrote:Fine Shagger wrote:James ♠ wrote:Fine Shagger wrote:B is for faaackin anti-football mugs
Defending is part of football.
Attacking is defence, putting men behind the ball is anti-football scum.
I don't see Barcelona throwing 10 men ahead of the player with the ball. You are just an idiot, you go on about how good Busquets is then you say attacking is defence when Busquets doesn't even attack.
And don't even come out with bullshit about Busquets attacking because he starts attacks from the back, because i'll use the same example with a conference goalkeeper hoofing the ball up and call him an attacker.
Out of all the teams you could have chosen, you choose Barca! Barca play a very high line of defense and everyone (including strikers) put instant pressure on the opposing team when they lose possession so they can regain it.
Guest- Guest
A all day everyday.
Mostly because B is bad for my blood pressure.
Mostly because B is bad for my blood pressure.
Guest- Guest
ahlycotc wrote:James ♠ wrote:Fine Shagger wrote:James ♠ wrote:Fine Shagger wrote:B is for faaackin anti-football mugs
Defending is part of football.
Attacking is defence, putting men behind the ball is anti-football scum.
I don't see Barcelona throwing 10 men ahead of the player with the ball. You are just an idiot, you go on about how good Busquets is then you say attacking is defence when Busquets doesn't even attack.
And don't even come out with bullshit about Busquets attacking because he starts attacks from the back, because i'll use the same example with a conference goalkeeper hoofing the ball up and call him an attacker.
Out of all the teams you could have chosen, you choose Barca! Barca play a very high line of defense and everyone (including strikers) put instant pressure on the opposing team when they lose possession so they can regain it.
I chose Barca cos that moron supports them. Actually, not a moron... half a moron.. he is alright sometimes.
And every team defends, that is my point. It isn't all about attacking.
Guest- Guest
A was like the first half of the Munich game last season
B was like the second half
I know which one I enjoyed more.
B was like the second half
I know which one I enjoyed more.
Guest- Guest
I would like to win in style so, A.
But 3 points is the most important so B is important too.
But 3 points is the most important so B is important too.
Potato-7-
- Posts : 900
Location : Top of the league
Supports : Olympiakos
- Post n°45
Re: What do you find more entertaining when at a game?
by Potato-7 Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:43 pm
at home A
at away games B
at away games B
Jamie-
- Posts : 24047
Age : 63
Location : Thiago
Supports : That Catalan club
Jamesahlycotc wrote:JamesFine Shagger wrote:James
Defending is part of football.
Attacking is defence, putting men behind the ball is anti-football scum.
I don't see Barcelona throwing 10 men ahead of the player with the ball. You are just an idiot, you go on about how good Busquets is then you say attacking is defence when Busquets doesn't even attack.
And don't even come out with bullshit about Busquets attacking because he starts attacks from the back, because i'll use the same example with a conference goalkeeper hoofing the ball up and call him an attacker.
Out of all the teams you could have chosen, you choose Barca! Barca play a very high line of defense and everyone (including strikers) put instant pressure on the opposing team when they lose possession so they can regain it.
I chose Barca cos that moron supports them. Actually, not a moron... half a moron.. he is alright sometimes.
And every team defends, that is my point. It isn't all about attacking.
I thought it was obvious I was trolling
Guest- Guest
Fine Shagger wrote:Jamesahlycotc wrote:JamesFine Shagger wrote:
Attacking is defence, putting men behind the ball is anti-football scum.
I don't see Barcelona throwing 10 men ahead of the player with the ball. You are just an idiot, you go on about how good Busquets is then you say attacking is defence when Busquets doesn't even attack.
And don't even come out with bullshit about Busquets attacking because he starts attacks from the back, because i'll use the same example with a conference goalkeeper hoofing the ball up and call him an attacker.
Out of all the teams you could have chosen, you choose Barca! Barca play a very high line of defense and everyone (including strikers) put instant pressure on the opposing team when they lose possession so they can regain it.
I chose Barca cos that moron supports them. Actually, not a moron... half a moron.. he is alright sometimes.
And every team defends, that is my point. It isn't all about attacking.
I thought it was obvious I was trolling
It wasn't.
You arselick Barca so much no one can even tell.
Jamie-
- Posts : 24047
Age : 63
Location : Thiago
Supports : That Catalan club
I didn't even mention Barca.
Sponsored content
|
|
|