What do you find more entertaining when at a game?

A) Your team passing the other team off the park and hitting 5 or 6.

or

B) Your team defending a single goal lead for a lengthy period of time while you park the bus?



Personally I find option 2 way more exciting. When City go 3.0 up it all becomes a bit boring knowing the game is in the bag.

This is for people that go to games as watching on a stream is completely different.

A is more comfortable, and fun for a fan.

B is a rough, nail biting encounter.

I'd say A is more entertaining though.

Hmm. During the match definately option 1, the pressure is off and you can enjoy the match.

Option B is when your arsehole is going 5p, 10p for what seems an eternity. Although walking away from the stadium the sense of relief that you got all 3 points probably is emotionally better than walking away knowing you've earnt the 3 points half an hour before the final whistle.

B is for faaackin anti-football mugs

B is bad for the heart, I don't like it at all.

They dont beat a last minute winner
United fans are probably bored of them though

Fine Shagger wrote:B is for faaackin anti-football mugs

Defending is part of football.

B is ok, but not when cunts like Andres Iniesta score in the 90th minute

B for me

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:They dont beat a last minute winner
United fans are probably bored of them though

I agree, last minute winners are the best which is why I didn't post it. Not really fair.

B is so good but yet so bad . The emotions are all over the place.

James ♠ wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:B is for faaackin anti-football mugs

Defending is part of football.

Attacking is defence, putting men behind the ball is anti-football scum.

A is deffo more exciting, But the last 10/15 minutes of a B match are great and that feeling when the final whistle blows, or you get a second to wrap it up!

Sean wrote:B is ok, but not when cunts like Andres Iniesta score in the 90th minute

Thats why its way more exciting, you don't actually know what will happen.

Q: Last minute winners or a second half comeback from atleast 2 goal down?

James wrote:

Filippo Inzaghi wrote:They dont beat a last minute winner
United fans are probably bored of them though

I agree, last minute winners are the best which is why I didn't post it. Not really fair.

On the poll id pick B. I like to give my heart a test

Fine Shagger wrote:

James wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:B is for faaackin anti-football mugs

Defending is part of football.

Attacking is defence, putting men behind the ball is anti-football scum.

Its not really scum is it

B just elevates the euphoria when winning minor things such as throw ins, corners, tackles etc

James wrote:

Sean wrote:B is ok, but not when cunts like Andres Iniesta score in the 90th minute

Thats why its way more exciting, you don't actually know what will happen.

More exciting definitly, not more pleasurable though

Fine Shagger wrote:

James ♠ wrote:

Fine Shagger wrote:B is for faaackin anti-football mugs

Defending is part of football.

Attacking is defence, putting men behind the ball is anti-football scum.

I don't see Barcelona throwing 10 men ahead of the player with the ball. You are just an idiot, you go on about how good Busquets is then you say attacking is defence when Busquets doesn't even attack.

And don't even come out with bullshit about Busquets attacking because he starts attacks from the back, because i'll use the same example with a conference goalkeeper hoofing the ball up and call him an attacker.

Feel so much better walking out of another team's ground after B. The Preston game earlier in the season was a classic example, we were getting tubbed at the end but we held on and the feeling at the end was better than blowing my load.

Radford11 wrote:Q: Last minute winners or a second half comeback from atleast 2 goal down?

Last minute winner.

Nothing beats Bullards last minute goal at Sheff Utd. I hate the man but oh my god for a minute I loved him.

James ♠ wrote:
This is for people that go to games as watching on a stream is completely different.

You should include this in the thread title -- that way, I know to not enter into the thread.

You can never get tired of scoring last minute winners

Tough one. I like B for the relief after you've got the 3 points, feels more deserved (If that's the right word to use). Still, I like winning big in games though and when you're winning by a big margin your team starts showing off a bit more.

Radford11 wrote:Q: Last minute winners or a second half comeback from atleast 2 goal down?

A comeback!.....Istanbul 05

Scuba Steve wrote:

James ♠ wrote:
This is for people that go to games as watching on a stream is completely different.

You should include this in the thread title -- that way, I know to not enter into the thread.

Couldn't fit in the title, I tried.

If A is against lower opposition then after a few goals it gets boring. It's only exciting if you thrash a team as good as yours.

B isn't exciting at all.

B is only exciting after the game

James wrote:

Radford11 wrote:Q: Last minute winners or a second half comeback from atleast 2 goal down?

Last minute winner.

Nothing beats Bullards last minute goal at Sheff Utd. I hate the man but oh my god for a minute I loved him.

I'm not sure. Earlier in the season i seen us come from 3-0 down at half time away to win 4-3. When the fourth when in i think i was down the front screaming like my bollocks had never dropped

I'd much rather go to a game and witness A, it's a great feeling seeing your team do another team over.