The-Reporter wrote:Hopefully this doesn't distract him from his football. Stupid slag should of had an abortion and is probably only keeping it because Jack is a rich footballer.
Harsh.
The-Reporter wrote:Hopefully this doesn't distract him from his football. Stupid slag should of had an abortion and is probably only keeping it because Jack is a rich footballer.
Yeh well its probably true, and if Jack was just a nobody and she still kept it even though they split up.. then she is a stupid slag anyway.Zzonked wrote:The-Reporter wrote:Hopefully this doesn't distract him from his football. Stupid slag should of had an abortion and is probably only keeping it because Jack is a rich footballer.
Harsh.
The-Reporter wrote:Yeh well its probably true, and if Jack was just a nobody and she still kept it even though they split up.. then she is a stupid slag anyway.Zzonked wrote:The-Reporter wrote:Hopefully this doesn't distract him from his football. Stupid slag should of had an abortion and is probably only keeping it because Jack is a rich footballer.
Harsh.
Hopefully they get back together and stay together so he doesn't have any shit going on.
ahlycotc wrote:The day when women are criticized for NOT having an abortion.
Lux wrote:ahlycotc wrote:The day when women are criticized for NOT having an abortion.
Eh. Abortions aren't controversial in the UK IMO. It's usually more controversial when you keep the baby as a younger person
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:So, will Jack Wilshere Snr follow in the footstpes of his father?
Jelavic18|RFC wrote:So, will Jack Wilshere Snr follow in the footstpes of his father?
Luckily they have got back together but if they hadn't she would have spunged off Jack. My point is no footballer = no baby OR Baby + brung up by benefits.Weather130 wrote:I am personally not really in favor of the whole abortion thing. If this was really a mistake they neither of them wanted why could she not just put the kid up for adoption?
It's the same in the UK (if the mother were to go through the courts that is) although a lot of people do not pay this, which in most cases is illegal.Weather130 wrote:If they do not get back together this could be very akward. Hopefully it is a girl so this does not create problems with all the media trying to figure out if the baby will eventually play football and ask Jack if he would want his son to play football and such. Much less media issues exist in the long run if it is a boy. If they do not get back together what are the child support laws like in the UK? Here the parent that does not have full custody of the kid (almost always the father) has to pay a pre-decided amount of money for every month until the kid is 18 and an adult.
ahlycotc wrote:Abortion is one of the very heated debates in the US. People debate whether women should have the ability to perform an abortion. But never have I heard someone criticize a woman for NOT having an abortion. A woman has every God damn right to keep a baby. If you have a problem with that, you should be pointing the finger at the man for knocking her up.
Lux wrote:...The sad thing is, there's not nearly as much sympathy for men who want the child when the mother doesn't. It's pathetic in this day and age, men are still left to pick up the shit and if the couple split, they're kicked out of a house they probably paid for mostly themselves....and they get to see their children every fortnight if they're lucky. I think maybe your view is out dated....maybe it's related to Islam, I'm not sure.....?
ahlycotc wrote:No, if it was related to Islam, I would say she should not have an abortion at all. But I'm talking from a secular point of view right now.
Anyways, you said both parents should agree on a decision. Well what if they don't? I think the woman has the power to make the ultimate decision (she is carrying the child after all). The man is taking a risk by having sex outside of wedlock or without intention to have a child. It doesn't matter if she "tricked him" in having a baby or the contraception didn't work. It's not like he was forced to have sex with her. No contraception is 100% fail-proof.
Now you said the man might want the child but the mother doesn't want it. If you have a disagreement between 2 people, one of them is going to win eventually. And that winner should be the mother because she is carrying the child. Tough luck to the guy, maybe he should find a partner that is willing to have a child next time.
ahlycotc wrote:You can't force anyone to have an abortion. That would be ridiculous. It doesn't matter what the man wants if the woman wants to keep the baby. The only exception is if the woman raped the man or did something illegal to get pregnant. If both parties sign a contract before sex, then OK. But no such contracts exist these days.
There is a really simple solution to all this. If you aren't ready to have a child, don't have sex unless you are willing to take the risk. By having sex, you are taking that risk and assume all responsibility if a child is born.
ahlycotc wrote:It's kind of hard to argue a point that I don't fully believe in. My real view is that abortion should be illegal. If you had consensual sex, you assume the risk and have to take responsibility. If both parents decide not to keep the child or cannot provide the child a decent life, then the child should be put up for adoption. If either party was raped, the victim should have the choice of keeping the child or putting it up for adoption. Maybe provide the victim a tax incentive for keeping the child. If the birth process can prove fatal to the mother, then that is the only time abortion should be allowed.
ENGLAND soccer sensation Jack Wilshere is to become a father at 19.
The mum-to-be is Lauren Neal, 22 - from whom the Arsenal ace recently split after a three-year romance.