Unban Liam

James wrote:

moscowmadeit3 wrote:It would cause so many arguments though.

And Luke, Polska, Egzon with their trolling/anti englishness doesn't cause arguments?

People argue too much on here, they try to start arguments when I have an opinion(a valid one).

There isn't much hope for the forum if people aren't allowed opinions.

Just because England isn't #1 at everything doesn't mean I am anti-English.

I was hoping that by now, most people on here don't think I am so anti-english, as to be frank, it is disgusting to be labled as anti-any nationality.

luke. wrote:Oh dear James.. I said I stopped trolling almost 2 months ago.

That isn't the point (although you admitted to trolling a few days ago)

I'm not having ago, i'm just saying if trolling isn't going to be punished then Liam should be back.
Also everyone should start getting warned for constantly having the opinion that Messi and Ronaldo are the best 2 players in the world.

Doesn't matter if it is true or not, it is still an opinion which people seemingly don't want Liam to have.

News to me.. Still, stop the witchhunt, making you look like a little baby crying to the mods

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

GK01 wrote:We have a poll to see what the forum wants leave it to that

Link me.

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t2735-should-liamb_21-be-unbanned-and-given-a-fair-chance

I've seen it.

25 against, 19 for. I think that is good enough reason to let him back. Sure it isn't majority but it is 46%.

But what the people what, you have to judge by the majority, no is the majority ATM.

Why are majority votes not done on everyone then. This isn't the way it should be done, it is unfair. He should be given a chance and only be banned if he goes through the warning system like everyone else. No doubt if he is back though people will try have him warned for trolling which people do not get warned for at the moment anyway.

luke. wrote:News to me.. Still, stop the witchhunt, making you look like a little baby crying to the mods

I'm using it as an example, I don't want you banned, I don't want anyone banned. But people have gotta be treat the same.

He did get treated fairly, made a dupe account and got banned.

He's on EA if you want to talk to him that much

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:difference between me and him is he does it every post and just winds people up all the time.

Id rather him on here than you, at least hes actually funny

I don't care tbh, it's a football forum not a popularity contest

yeah he would contribute more than you. You just get called ginger by people

Yes, spouting shit about one player contributes a lot. Also, one guy does it repeatedly because he's a lowlife cunt.

But hes actually right surprisingly...

Villa
Van Persie
Tevez
Cavani

They are the only 4 atm i can think of who are up there at the moment

luke. wrote:He did get treated fairly, made a dupe account and got banned.

He's on EA if you want to talk to him that much

He denied that the other account was his though? Even if it was his, everyone insults someone on here anyway.

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

moscowmadeit3 wrote:

Link me.

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t2735-should-liamb_21-be-unbanned-and-given-a-fair-chance

I've seen it.

25 against, 19 for. I think that is good enough reason to let him back. Sure it isn't majority but it is 46%.

But what the people what, you have to judge by the majority, no is the majority ATM.

Why are majority votes not done on everyone then. This isn't the way it should be done, it is unfair. He should be given a chance and only be banned if he goes through the warning system like everyone else. No doubt if he is back though people will try have him warned for trolling which people do not get warned for at the moment anyway.

The poll is open to everyone and anyone, no-one said it wasn't

Is Opinion your 'word of the day', James?

The other account was his. Got ip checked

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

http://www.the-playmaker.com/t2735-should-liamb_21-be-unbanned-and-given-a-fair-chance

I've seen it.

25 against, 19 for. I think that is good enough reason to let him back. Sure it isn't majority but it is 46%.

But what the people what, you have to judge by the majority, no is the majority ATM.

Why are majority votes not done on everyone then. This isn't the way it should be done, it is unfair. He should be given a chance and only be banned if he goes through the warning system like everyone else. No doubt if he is back though people will try have him warned for trolling which people do not get warned for at the moment anyway.

The poll is open to everyone and anyone, no-one said it wasn't

We don't vote on every single member so there is no reason we should vote on him.

luke. wrote:The other account was his. Got ip checked

Well like I said, insults fly around on here every day.

I think we should have a vote for every single member, weed out the unpopular ones.

Lets not.

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

I've seen it.

25 against, 19 for. I think that is good enough reason to let him back. Sure it isn't majority but it is 46%.

But what the people what, you have to judge by the majority, no is the majority ATM.

Why are majority votes not done on everyone then. This isn't the way it should be done, it is unfair. He should be given a chance and only be banned if he goes through the warning system like everyone else. No doubt if he is back though people will try have him warned for trolling which people do not get warned for at the moment anyway.

The poll is open to everyone and anyone, no-one said it wasn't

We don't vote on every single member so there is no reason we should vote on him.

Well it can be easily found if you find it or not it's where you browse. Also if they don't vote they don't vote but with all the people that voted the majority wins and you have to take that as the majority of the forum.

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:Id rather him on here than you, at least hes actually funny

I don't care tbh, it's a football forum not a popularity contest

yeah he would contribute more than you. You just get called ginger by people

Yes, spouting shit about one player contributes a lot. Also, one guy does it repeatedly because he's a lowlife cunt.

But hes actually right surprisingly...

Villa
Van Persie
Tevez
Cavani

They are the only 4 atm i can think of who are up there at the moment

Talking about one player constantly doesn't contribute much.. Even most of the utd fans want him out because o matter what he'll always bum berba.. Even if Rooney scores a hattrick and berba plays shit he will make some shit up to make berba sound like man of the match:|

Most of the liverpool fans are just worried about being proved wrong.

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

But what the people what, you have to judge by the majority, no is the majority ATM.

Why are majority votes not done on everyone then. This isn't the way it should be done, it is unfair. He should be given a chance and only be banned if he goes through the warning system like everyone else. No doubt if he is back though people will try have him warned for trolling which people do not get warned for at the moment anyway.

The poll is open to everyone and anyone, no-one said it wasn't

We don't vote on every single member so there is no reason we should vote on him.

Well it can be easily found if you find it or not it's where you browse. Also if they don't vote they don't vote but with all the people that voted the majority wins and you have to take that as the majority of the forum.

You really aren't getting my point. Why should he be voted on when none of us where? There is plenty of people have trolled on this forum so why have they not been voted on or off the forum?

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:I don't care tbh, it's a football forum not a popularity contest

yeah he would contribute more than you. You just get called ginger by people

Yes, spouting shit about one player contributes a lot. Also, one guy does it repeatedly because he's a lowlife cunt.

But hes actually right surprisingly...

Villa
Van Persie
Tevez
Cavani

They are the only 4 atm i can think of who are up there at the moment

Talking about one player constantly doesn't contribute much.. Even most of the utd fans want him out because o matter what he'll always bum berba.. Even if Rooney scores a hattrick and berba plays shit he will make some shit up to make berba sound like man of the match:|

But people go on about every performance about Messi whether it is over seperate topics or not.

The day we start kicking off members based on popularity is the day this forum dies

Fucking hell

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:I don't care tbh, it's a football forum not a popularity contest

yeah he would contribute more than you. You just get called ginger by people

Yes, spouting shit about one player contributes a lot. Also, one guy does it repeatedly because he's a lowlife cunt.

But hes actually right surprisingly...

Villa
Van Persie
Tevez
Cavani

They are the only 4 atm i can think of who are up there at the moment

Talking about one player constantly doesn't contribute much.. Even most of the utd fans want him out because o matter what he'll always bum berba.. Even if Rooney scores a hattrick and berba plays shit he will make some shit up to make berba sound like man of the match:|

Well rooney hasnt scored a hat-trick for fuck knows how long so thats bollox, imo as i said earlier people are just bitter they have been proved wrong. Anyway as i said people just abuse you so you dont exaclty contribute much

Theeeooo wrote:Most of the liverpool fans are just worried about being proved wrong.

Nah he's just a prick.

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

Why are majority votes not done on everyone then. This isn't the way it should be done, it is unfair. He should be given a chance and only be banned if he goes through the warning system like everyone else. No doubt if he is back though people will try have him warned for trolling which people do not get warned for at the moment anyway.

The poll is open to everyone and anyone, no-one said it wasn't

We don't vote on every single member so there is no reason we should vote on him.

Well it can be easily found if you find it or not it's where you browse. Also if they don't vote they don't vote but with all the people that voted the majority wins and you have to take that as the majority of the forum.

You really aren't getting my point. Why should he be voted on when none of us where? There is plenty of people have trolled on this forum so why have they not been voted on or off the forum?

Well he's the one that has come up.

It's like saying why should these two be the ones we have to vote for, for PM, when everyone else in the country can't be voted for.

luke. wrote:The day we start kicking off members based on popularity is the day this forum dies

So Liam should be brought back and given a proper chance in that case.

Jord wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:Most of the liverpool fans are just worried about being proved wrong.

Nah he's just a prick.

Becuase he calls you deluded scousers and proved you wrong about the berbinator?

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

James wrote:

GK01 wrote:

The poll is open to everyone and anyone, no-one said it wasn't

We don't vote on every single member so there is no reason we should vote on him.

Well it can be easily found if you find it or not it's where you browse. Also if they don't vote they don't vote but with all the people that voted the majority wins and you have to take that as the majority of the forum.

You really aren't getting my point. Why should he be voted on when none of us where? There is plenty of people have trolled on this forum so why have they not been voted on or off the forum?

Well he's the one that has come up.

It's like saying why should these two be the ones we have to vote for, for PM, when everyone else in the country can't be voted for.

Anyone who forms a party can be voted for to be in power I believe. The fact is most don't have big enough campaigns for anyone to notice or are just shit ideas.

James wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:yeah he would contribute more than you. You just get called ginger by people

Yes, spouting shit about one player contributes a lot. Also, one guy does it repeatedly because he's a lowlife cunt.

But hes actually right surprisingly...

Villa
Van Persie
Tevez
Cavani

They are the only 4 atm i can think of who are up there at the moment

Talking about one player constantly doesn't contribute much.. Even most of the utd fans want him out because o matter what he'll always bum berba.. Even if Rooney scores a hattrick and berba plays shit he will make some shit up to make berba sound like man of the match:|

But people go on about every performance about Messi whether it is over seperate topics or not.

Yeah but this quite different, no matter what thread, he'll just talk shit about berb. if he gets unbanned everyone will be crying for him to be banned within days, you know it.

James ♠ wrote:

luke. wrote:The day we start kicking off members based on popularity is the day this forum dies

So Liam should be brought back and given a proper chance in that case.

Why do you want him back? Why??? You shouldn't care what so ever.. Plus he was a dick(Ok mostly to Liverpool fans but not a good member at all).

Just leave it James.