Unban Liam

Jord wrote:

Royal wrote:

Jord wrote:I swear if you unban him I know for a fact a few of the Liverpool fans will fuck off. It's not good for the forum and you lot know it.

Well if some people are willing to leave for the sake of 1 member it just shows their level of immaturity. There's a foes list he can be put on so his posts won't show for you.

At all? Because on EA I could see when he posted(Not what said though) and I could see his posts when people quote him. If this foes list makes his posts completely unviewable from my side then I'll be happy.

I'm not sure, I'll test it out.

Ben wrote:Are you able to ban him from just one thread? (Liverpool)

Also, he wouldn't be quite so persistent with his trolling if he got warned for it.

Nah, but we could just give him a warning and delete his post if he posts in there.

James, why are you so intent on trying to get Liam back anyway, hes been gone for ages and it hasnt really affected the forum. Bringing him back will just cause trouble, like this thread is doing right now.

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:You're trying to improve the forum, yet you sound willing to unban a member which the majority loathe.

2 steps forward 1 step back.

How about a swap deal you go to the Ea forums and liam comes here? no steps going back then

How about.. no.

So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

oh dear.

In some peoples opinions they found liam annoying so they banned him, but equally a few people including myself find you annoying but your still on here?

luke. wrote:

James ♠ wrote:

luke. wrote:You're trying to improve the forum, yet you sound willing to unban a member which the majority loathe.

2 steps forward 1 step back.

But people can ignore him, what is the problem?

That's like saying there is a rapist on the loose, but just ignore him and it'll be fine.

I would take your point as valid if there wasn't already trolls and pricks on this forum.

Ben wrote:Are you able to ban him from just one thread? (Liverpool)

Also, he wouldn't be quite so persistent with his trolling if he got warned for it.

I don't think there is a forum option to do so, but a verbal banning should be good enough, if Liam really wants to continue posting here.

GK01 wrote:

(polskaGOLA) wrote:

GK01 wrote:Listen the way Liam
was banned, since me and Mal talked it over, end of the day the better
decision was to ban Liam, and I stand by it.

We didn't have rules
or guidlines to follow back than though. You and Mal went on the bases
of "He annoys people, let's ban him"

We went off the complaints I had received and what was best for the forum.

Although, with no rules or guidelines to follow. I am not questioning your decision at the time, but now we have rules and guidelines to follow, he should be giving a second and fair chance before being banned like everyone else on here. Remember, this is a community not a club.

Cameron_LFC wrote:James, why are you so intent on trying to get Liam back anyway, hes been gone for ages and it hasnt really affected the forum. Bringing him back will just cause trouble, like this thread is doing right now.

This thread is causing no trouble. From what i'm reading people are just discussing.

I like his posts.

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:How about a swap deal you go to the Ea forums and liam comes here? no steps going back then

How about.. no.

So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

oh dear.

In some peoples opinions they found liam annoying so they banned him, but equally a few people including myself find you annoying but your still on here?

I find you annoying, that doesn't mean you should be banned.

Have some respect you cunt

Royal wrote:

Jord wrote:
At all? Because on EA I could see when he posted(Not what said though) and I could see his posts when people quote him. If this foes list makes his posts completely unviewable from my side then I'll be happy.

I'm not sure, I'll test it out.

Nope, still shows quotes.

luke. wrote:

James wrote:

luke. wrote:You're trying to improve the forum, yet you sound willing to unban a member which the majority loathe.

2 steps forward 1 step back.

But people can ignore him, what is the problem?

That's like saying there is a rapist on the loose, but just ignore him and it'll be fine.

Not quite Mate, not quite

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:How about.. no.

So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

oh dear.

In some peoples opinions they found liam annoying so they banned him, but equally a few people including myself find you annoying but your still on here?

I find you annoying, that doesn't mean you should be banned.

Have some respect you cunt

Exactly. So you find liam annoying why should he be banned? Your being the disrespectful one. Grow some

I would love it if after all this Liam said no anyway

Sean CFC wrote:I would love it if after all this Liam said no anyway

Wouldn't of come back today if that was the case.

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:You're trying to improve the forum, yet you sound willing to unban a member which the majority loathe.

2 steps forward 1 step back.

How about a swap deal you go to the Ea forums and liam comes here? no steps going back then

How about.. no.

So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

You've only been here a few days

James wrote:

Cameron_LFC wrote:James, why are you so intent on trying to get Liam back anyway, hes been gone for ages and it hasnt really affected the forum. Bringing him back will just cause trouble, like this thread is doing right now.

This thread is causing no trouble. From what i'm reading people are just discussing.

I like his posts.

More like arguments, but ok. You like his posts, ok, im sure he posts on the EA forum quite a lot, if you like his posts? Or you could go into the old forum and read through the archives, theres sure to be a lot of laughs for you there

Ben wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:You're trying to improve the forum, yet you sound willing to unban a member which the majority loathe.

2 steps forward 1 step back.

How about a swap deal you go to the Ea forums and liam comes here? no steps going back then

How about.. no.

So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

You've only been here a few days

Weeks now, but point?

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

oh dear.

In some peoples opinions they found liam annoying so they banned him, but equally a few people including myself find you annoying but your still on here?

I find you annoying, that doesn't mean you should be banned.

Have some respect you cunt

Exactly. So you find liam annoying why should he be banned? Your being the disrespectful one. Grow some

majority have already said they don't want him back. /thread

Mal is online now anyway, we can take his judgement on all of this.

Majority of who actually voted. Plus its 22 - 25

For what it is worth, I don't know how serious Liam is with Berbatov, but when he is not discussing Berbatov, he writes posts with effort in them, which is much more than what others on here can say.

I say we do these two things, if we are to unban Liam:

i) Use the autocorrect system to replace Berbatov with Berbaflop. If he sees this, he may get bored of trolling Berbatov.
ii) Ban him from the Liverpool thread.

25 for no. 22 for yes.

Simple math.

he may just call him the berbinator :shock:

Theeeooo wrote:

Ben wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:How about a swap deal you go to the Ea forums and liam comes here? no steps going back then

How about.. no.

So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

You've only been here a few days

Weeks now, but point?

Point is that since you've joined he hasn't really done anything to warrant the stick you're giving him. A couple of days ago you were saying 'haha everyone calls him ginger poor him' and now you're laying into him for no reason.

Cameron, you may as well not bother posting on my threads anymore because unlesse you post something constructive I will ignore it.

As for Mal online. Don't lock the thread, join in the discussion.

Ben wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

Ben wrote:

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:How about.. no.

So its fine for you to be here who is more 'annoying' than liam, but he isnt allowed here? Hmm

You've only been here a few days

Weeks now, but point?

Point is that since you've joined he hasn't really done anything to warrant the stick you're giving him. A couple of days ago you were saying 'haha everyone calls him ginger poor him' and now you're laying into him for no reason.

maybe the fact that hes bummin the rulebook has given me a slight dislike to him but he was pissing me off on the Ea forums aswell

luke. wrote:25 for no. 22 for yes.

Simple math.

Close though, like said before. He isn't up against someone so majority doesn't have to be used. In my opinion 22 vs 25 is a good enough reason to give him a chance.

luke. wrote:25 for no. 22 for yes.

Simple math.

luke. wrote:25 for no. 22 for yes.

Simple math.

But the vote is not over yet. Stop trying to make little smart comments

(polskaGOLA) wrote:For what it is worth, I don't know how serious Liam is with Berbatov, but when he is not discussing Berbatov, he writes posts with effort in them, which is much more than what others on here can say.

I say we do these two things, if we are to unban Liam:

i) Use the autocorrect system to replace Berbatov with Berbaflop. If he sees this, he may get bored of trolling Berbatov.
ii) Ban him from the Liverpool thread.

Don't, that will look so bad.

But yeah, he does actually have some good points when he's discussing Berbatov.

Haha, ok. I don't know why you're on your high horse when you're a bigger troll than any of those people you've mentioned.

And for your information 'I like his posts.' is hardly reason enough to try to get someone who is almost universally hated on this forum unbanned.

Theeeooo wrote:

luke. wrote:25 for no. 22 for yes.

Simple math.

But the vote is not over yet. Stop trying to make little smart comments

It wasn't smart at all, as I said it was simple math.