forestfcfan wrote:I understand where Luke is coming from tbf.
I don't have a problem with them officiating if they can do a good job, but i'd rather them not, simply because the focus will always be on them rather than the game.
Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Also, you've seen one good game from a women official. If they consistently out-perform the males then maybe you have a case. But for now leave it as is, and introduce camera replays into the game. Wiping out human-error, which everyone is prone to, not like women are invincible to it.
So, let me get this right. Women can referee if they prove they can ref games better than men, but they aren't allowed the chance to do so?
I have absolutely no problem. We've got female fans, female pundits, female physios, female members in the boardroom, even some female coaches. Nothing wrong with it for me.
But, I've not got the opinion on women as people did in the 50's.
luke. wrote:Dan wrote:luke. wrote:Also, you've seen one good game from a women official. If they consistently out-perform the males then maybe you have a case. But for now leave it as is, and introduce camera replays into the game. Wiping out human-error, which everyone is prone to, not like women are invincible to it.
So, let me get this right. Women can referee if they prove they can ref games better than men, but they aren't allowed the chance to do so?
I have absolutely no problem. We've got female fans, female pundits, female physios, female members in the boardroom, even some female coaches. Nothing wrong with it for me.
But, I've not got the opinion on women as people did in the 50's.
I obviously wouldn't have said what I did without giving them a chance
