Oh fucking dear.

luke. wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:

luke. wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:

luke. wrote:Chelse had WAYYYYYYY better chances then Wolves, don't forget we hit the post from open play, not a FK, and Kalou should have scored twice, and Malouda once.

Bullshit.

if the ref had played the advantage rather than blow for the FK, we would have had another attack on goal through open play! it was right in front of me and the ball had broken to Hunt who was in acres of space on the edge of the 6 yard box. i've not seen the highlights, i take it MOTD didn't show Zubar's effort that forced the best save of the game!

the fact remains that what chances Chelsea had, they were unable to take due in no small part to the constant pressure the Wolves' defence put them under.

I watched the full match. The ref was poor, gave everything to Wolves tbh.

again, fucking bullshit. what the ref didn't do is favour the "big club" which is what normally happens. are you upset that he penalised Cole for time wasting from a throw in while trying to walk 10 yards up the pitch from where it should have been taken? and that consitutes "giving everything to Wolves"?

supporters of these top teams expect special treatment from the officials every game and then when a game is reffed properly they get all cunty about it! give me an example of the ref giving us everything................

Chelsea hardly got a decision all game

Wolves were fouling all our players and the ref constantly gave the FK to wolves.

you're full of shit and have completely bought into this non contact crap that the PL is pushing. The Chelsea players should make more of an effort to stay on their feet rather than falling over when they they are breathed upon, Branislav Ivanovic would be the perfect example of this, when he fell over at the slightest bit of incidental contact. i do have to admit Wolves were awarded a very soft freekick when Stephen Ward went over in a similar fashion but to mind it was the only dubious decision given our way. seems to me that you believe the media hype about what a dirty team Wolves are, i suggest you do some homework and look up who the worst behaved teams really are because the press wont tell you it's Arsenal & Citeh! they are too busy wanking over those teams to actually print anything of any relevance!

I don't believe Wolves are a dirty team at all, the media are full of shit.

How are players supposed to stay on their feet when their feet are being taken from underneath them?

luke. wrote:I don't believe Wolves are a dirty team at all, the media are full of shit.

How are players supposed to stay on their feet when their feet are being taken from underneath them?

so you noticed that but failed to see Terry deliberately elbow Doyle and Punch Hunt in the back of the head - both are red card offences!

i was told by a Chelsea fan outside the ground that Drogba had chinned Hunt after the final whistle too and nothing was done.

luke. wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:

luke. wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:

luke. wrote:Chelse had WAYYYYYYY better chances then Wolves, don't forget we hit the post from open play, not a FK, and Kalou should have scored twice, and Malouda once.

Bullshit.

if the ref had played the advantage rather than blow for the FK, we would have had another attack on goal through open play! it was right in front of me and the ball had broken to Hunt who was in acres of space on the edge of the 6 yard box. i've not seen the highlights, i take it MOTD didn't show Zubar's effort that forced the best save of the game!

the fact remains that what chances Chelsea had, they were unable to take due in no small part to the constant pressure the Wolves' defence put them under.

I watched the full match. The ref was poor, gave everything to Wolves tbh.

again, fucking bullshit. what the ref didn't do is favour the "big club" which is what normally happens. are you upset that he penalised Cole for time wasting from a throw in while trying to walk 10 yards up the pitch from where it should have been taken? and that consitutes "giving everything to Wolves"?

supporters of these top teams expect special treatment from the officials every game and then when a game is reffed properly they get all cunty about it! give me an example of the ref giving us everything................

Chelsea hardly got a decision all game

Wolves were fouling all our players and the ref constantly gave the FK to wolves.

Match Stats




Wolverhampton Wanderers Chelsea

3(2)	Shots (on Goal)	19(3)
15	Fouls	13
4	Corner Kicks	9
2	Offsides	3
32%	Time of Possession	69%
0	Yellow Cards	1
0	Red Cards	0 (despite a punch to the back of the head)
3	Saves	2

yourself

That stat proves my point mean

luke. wrote:That stat proves my point mean

The fact that Wolves were called for more fouls than Chelsea proves your point about Chelsea "hardly getting a decision all game"?

On what fucking planet in what shitlogic universe?

And what about Terry's head punch? I suppose that proves your point somehow too.

menalawyerguy wrote:

luke. wrote:That stat proves my point mean

The fact that Wolves were called for more fouls than Chelsea proves your point about Chelsea "hardly getting a call all game"?

On what fucking planet in what shitlogic universe?

menalawyerguy wrote:

luke. wrote:That stat proves my point mean

The fact that Wolves were called for more fouls than Chelsea proves your point about Chelsea "hardly getting a decision all game"?

On what fucking planet in what shitlogic universe?

And what about Terry's head punch? I suppose that proves your point somehow too.

Haha luke is just a stubborn person, just don't bother..no mater what you put up he will still find something useless and claim he's right.

Oh dear Luke.

luke. wrote:That stat proves my point mean

proves what? lots of possesion and plenty of shots from distance that didn't force one save! great point mate. well done. i'd already acknowledged the possesion and the corners were due to our resolute defending!

im not gonna trust any stats that claim Wolves had 32% of the possesion to chelsea's 69% anyway!

'orrible bastard wrote:im not gonna trust any stats that claim Wolves had 32% of the possesion to chelsea's 69% anyway!

ESPN Soccernet and Skysports both have it as such. Skysports had the territorial advantage at Chelsea 53-47 Wolves.

Luke digs himself yet another massive hole.

Chelsea have some tough games coming up aswell.

Blackburn H - Should be 3 points but Blackburn played them off the pitch and lost in their last game so owe them one.

Bolton A - Again should be 3 points but they only managed to scrape past them a week ago.

Sunderland A - They got spanked by Gyan and co at the bridge already.

Liverpool H - Already suffered Torres' wrath once this season.

After these 4 games Ancelotti could look like this...

menalawyerguy wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:im not gonna trust any stats that claim Wolves had 32% of the possesion to chelsea's 69% anyway!

ESPN Soccernet and Skysports both have it as such. Skysports had the territorial advantage at Chelsea 53-47 Wolves.

They need maths lessons.

yarnbury11 wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

'orrible bastard wrote:im not gonna trust any stats that claim Wolves had 32% of the possesion to chelsea's 69% anyway!

ESPN Soccernet and Skysports both have it as such. Skysports had the territorial advantage at Chelsea 53-47 Wolves.

They need maths lessons.

What are the true numbers?

Wolves 46% - 54% Chelsea

Apparently.

32% - 69% is impossible, adds up to 101%.

kyro7 wrote:Wolves 46% - 54% Chelsea

Apparently.

32% - 69% is impossible, adds up to 101%.

I remember seeing it come up in the second half that Chelsea had 69 to 31.
(for second half posession only)

probly chelsea had much more ball but they never shoot at goal or maked wolves goalkeep making save so what is point of statistic like that?