vex wrote:And you have a sloppy, mold infested vagina, Evra said so therefore it must be true.Keanoo wrote:Racist cunt.
You can fuck off this forum.
if Suarez really was correct, then why did the story of Dalglish, Comolli and Kuyt all differ and contradict? Suarez attempted to explain this away by saying that the two misunderstood him because the meaning "lost something in traslation". Kuyt speaks Dutch, Comolli Spanish. What are the chances that the two misunderstood him in two languages?
Kuyt, Dalglish and Comolli ALL stated on the record that Suarez said 'Tu es Negro' (you are black) or a variation thereof. What is the likelihood that all three would get it wrong?
Kuyt, Dalglish and Comolli basically backed up Evra's version of events, and made the FA's case for them.
Objectively speaking, it could be argued that it looks like Suarez changed his story after learning that Kuyt, Dalglish and Comolli contradicted him.
It's also entirely possibly that Kuyt, Dalglish and Comolli DID mishear/misunderstand Suarez. However, on the balance of probabilities (which is how the Panel assessed the evidence), you would have to say that it's not very probable.
The inconsistency between Suarez's own statement and what he told Comolli, Dalglish and Kuyt after the game was clearly fatal to his case, and I just don't see how three separate people could 'misunderstand' what Suarez told them.