Eden Hazard revealing who he's joining after Lille match

Yoda wrote:A dick, Eden Hazard is.

iSamuel wrote:Hatersgonhate.

iSamuel wrote:Hatersgonhate.

ViVaRooney wrote:in that scenario sure its not fair cause that effects ONE guy, if he leaves someone else can come in and do the same thing

but something like football its totally different. it effects the club selling alot more ways then just losing one player. not to mention this asset that leaves can play against you.. so i still think its fair that if you have a contract with a club you cant leave unless the club lets you. again after the first contract signing dont extend the contract if you feel like you want to have freedom about where you go. signing an extension then 6 months later wanting to leave is your fault and yours only

nowadays players can leave whenever they want pretty much anyway. and please dont you dare say slavery again, i cant even begin to explain how retarded that comment is. ronaldo said something similar and was rightly ridiculed

ahlycotc wrote:I think all football contracts should include a release fee clause. Either the player or a club has to pay the release fee amount for the player to leave.

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

ViVaRooney wrote:in that scenario sure its not fair cause that effects ONE guy, if he leaves someone else can come in and do the same thing

No they can't, be's a phenomenal barman.

but something like football its totally different. it effects the club selling alot more ways then just losing one player. not to mention this asset that leaves can play against you.. so i still think its fair that if you have a contract with a club you cant leave unless the club lets you. again after the first contract signing dont extend the contract if you feel like you want to have freedom about where you go. signing an extension then 6 months later wanting to leave is your fault and yours only

The bar man is working for the Black Bull, which is a rival pub to the Fox and Grapes. That will harm the Fox and Grapes' business.

If you don't sign the extension you don't get paid a fair amount for your services - what are you supposed to do?

nowadays players can leave whenever they want pretty much anyway. and please dont you dare say slavery again, i cant even begin to explain how retarded that comment is. ronaldo said something similar and was rightly ridiculed

It is slavery - if no-one will pay to free them they are kept in places against their will and forced to do things that they don't like, by crude businessmen who only care about one thing - money. The best example is Luka Modric, he got forced to stay at Tottenham against his will and was forced to play for Tottenham despite the fact that the Daniel 'Devious' Levy had agreed to let him go if a big club came in for him.

I don't want to bring religion into this, but you would think a man with Daniel Levy's religion and heritage wouldn't want anything to do with keeping people in places against their will and doing things to people that they don't like, but even he did it, so what hope has any footballer got?

ViVaRooney wrote:

ResurrectionRooney wrote:

No they can't, be's a phenomenal barman.



The bar man is working for the Black Bull, which is a rival pub to the Fox and Grapes. That will harm the Fox and Grapes' business.

If you don't sign the extension you don't get paid a fair amount for your services - what are you supposed to do?



It is slavery - if no-one will pay to free them they are kept in places against their will and forced to do things that they don't like, by crude businessmen who only care about one thing - money. The best example is Luka Modric, he got forced to stay at Tottenham against his will and was forced to play for Tottenham despite the fact that the Daniel 'Devious' Levy had agreed to let him go if a big club came in for him.

I don't want to bring religion into this, but you would think a man with Daniel Levy's religion and heritage wouldn't want anything to do with keeping people in places against their will and doing things to people that they don't like, but even he did it, so what hope has any footballer got?

forced to do things they dont like?? wtf you on about.. they are playing football i didnt know slavery was so luxurious, i dont feel so bad for the black people all those years ago now, they got shit load of money back then to do what they love to do huh

Yoda wrote:A dick, Eden Hazard is.

ViVaRooney wrote:but how is it slavery when said player can quit football.. when said player chose to be in that situation..

ViVaRooney wrote:but again, they could go to college/university, get an education and work like everyone else if they feel they are slaves. no one forces them to play football

ViVaRooney wrote:but he doesnt have to get into football(so wont need to quit).. he knows the system. or he could quit after his contract is up but again the situation has never changed so he wouldnt get into it anyway if he felts like it was slavery

luke. wrote:http://soccernet.espn.go.com/columns/story/_/id/1082536/eden-hazard-is-chelsea-bound-for-the-right-reasons?cc=5739

Think everyone should read this before putting a label on Hazard as Greedy, Arrogant, a Mercenary, or anything like that.

If he was interested in money he would have gone to Russia or china

Fonseca wrote:That article sucks with so much misleading shit like..

If he was interested in money he would have gone to Russia or china

lol... obviously he wants a decent career also..

N wrote:

iSamuel wrote:Hatersgonhate.

Chelsea Legend.

Can't believe since your support in 04', so much has happened. Lucky you.

ricky//habana wrote:Slavery. Don't be ridiculous. It's a contract Modric had a very good look at, likely with an agent, and signed knowing full well the terms and conditions. If he decides he's done with that club before the time is up he can hand in a request to leave, if rejected then he can make like Tevez.

Footballers don't get forced to play football. They agree to it in lucrative deals. Anyone arguing otherwise, including Ronaldo, is quite obviously bullshitting.

Zzonked wrote:

Chris wrote:
Why?

Can see him costing a lot more than he's worth and I don't really rate him.