Chelsea v Barcelona | Champions League Semifinal 1st Leg

at least post it man

It's not a specific post, just in general these past two days...

https://twitter.com/#!/TommySmythESPN

Any gifs on Drogba owning Puyol? please!

Rei Andros wrote:That move by Iniesta is called "la croqueta" by the way. I remember pulling it off once in a futsal game. One of my best memories.

Easy move bro.

Your hating is showing.

My bros keep thinking Puyol and Barca are the best, I just want to piss them off with when Didier owned Puyol.


How did you like Messi losing the ball and Ramires cutting it back for Drogba? LOL at Messi.

Messi is so good he even assists the other team.

Messi looks quite frustrated.

What do you expect, I'm fairly certain that's after he played Cesc through who tried a little chip which was pathetic and let Cole clear the ball.

kyro7 wrote:What do you expect, I'm fairly certain that's after he played Cesc through who tried a little chip which was pathetic and let Cole clear the ball.

Yeah it was after the Cesc chip, I can understand him being frustrated but I found it a little weird because he's usually really calm.

I want to feel sorry for him but he has a hot girl to go home too so it's all good

Possession
Chelsea had just 28% of possession
They completed 194 passes
Barcelona midfielder Xavi completed 127 passes alone

Kuled wrote:Possession
Chelsea had just 28% of possession
They completed 194 passes
Barcelona midfielder Xavi completed 127 passes alone

Who got more goals though?

Possession helps, but isn't necessary to come out the better team.

I'm not complaining. I just found those stats hilarious.

Lux wrote:

Kuled wrote:Possession
Chelsea had just 28% of possession
They completed 194 passes
Barcelona midfielder Xavi completed 127 passes alone

Who got more goals though?

Possession helps, but isn't necessary to come out the better team.

Well it obviously helped when Barca got about 7 chances and Chelsea got 1.

More chances mean shit all though.

:p

NZG wrote:More chances mean shit all though.

:p

No it doesn't, generally when you create more chances you'll score more goals, everyone knows Barcelona should have won easily last night, it's a one off. But it's vital for Chelsea.. if they play like that in the final they'll get creamed.

kyro7 wrote:Well it obviously helped when Barca got about 7 chances and Chelsea got 1.

and who took their chances? Scoring from those chances is 10000000 times more important than possession.

Lux wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Well it obviously helped when Barca got about 7 chances and Chelsea got 1.

and who took their chances? Scoring from those chances is 10000000 times more important than possession.

So we can both agree Chelsea got lucky that Barca wasted chances and despite sticking 10 behind the ball they got carved open.

kyro7 wrote:and who took their chances? Scoring from those chances is 10000000 times more important than possession.

So we can both agree Chelsea got lucky that Barca wasted chances and despite sticking 10 behind the ball they got carved open. [/quote]

Not really.

Chelsea are "lucky" that Barcelona couldn't finish.
Barcelona are "lucky" that Chelsea couldn't keep the ball as much.

You're a fucking spastic and you make me sick.

kyro7 wrote:You're a fucking spastic and you make me sick.

Football is a game of goals. You score, or you lose

Lux wrote:

kyro7 wrote:

Lux wrote:and who took their chances? Scoring from those chances is 10000000 times more important than possession.

So we can both agree Chelsea got lucky that Barca wasted chances and despite sticking 10 behind the ball they got carved open.

Not really.

Chelsea are "lucky" that Barcelona couldn't finish.
Barcelona are "lucky" that Chelsea couldn't keep the ball as much.

That is not luck, my friend.

Lux wrote:

kyro7 wrote:You're a fucking spastic and you make me sick.

Football is a game of goals. You score, or you lose

You're a stupid English prick I'm afraid.

Lux wrote:

kyro7 wrote:and who took their chances? Scoring from those chances is 10000000 times more important than possession.

So we can both agree Chelsea got lucky that Barca wasted chances and despite sticking 10 behind the ball they got carved open.

Not really.

Chelsea are "lucky" that Barcelona couldn't finish.
Barcelona are "lucky" that Chelsea couldn't keep the ball as much.[/quote]That isn't lucky, that's Barcelona being so dominant.

Rick Rosstrich wrote:That is not luck, my friend.

Then neither is Chelsea scoring more goals.

For me, you make your own luck. Chelsea scoring a goal then not wanting Barcelona to get an away goal is obvious. If Barcelona cannot score, that is because they were the worse team on the night. Was there any dodgy referee decisions for Chelsea or against Barcelona? Nothing in-particular.

kyro7 wrote:You're a stupid English prick I'm afraid.

You're English and Turkish...so what are you?

Lux wrote:

Rick Rosstrich wrote:That is not luck, my friend.

Then neither is Chelsea scoring more goals.

For me, you make your own luck. Chelsea scoring a goal then not wanting Barcelona to get an away goal is obvious. If Barcelona cannot score, that is because they were the worse team on the night. Was there any dodgy referee decisions for Chelsea or against Barcelona? Nothing in-particular.

What a moron.

kyro7 wrote:

NZG wrote:More chances mean shit all though.

:p

No it doesn't, generally when you create more chances you'll score more goals, everyone knows Barcelona should have won easily last night, it's a one off. But it's vital for Chelsea.. if they play like that in the final they'll get creamed.

I though the :p would give away I wa kidding.




Buzzing trololo winning

Lux wrote:You're English and Turkish Cypriot...so what are you?

I'm English, Turkish Cypriot and not a prick, you're a prick with a stupid English mentality, but you're not a prick just because you're English, I'm not saying everyone English is a prick, but you are.

Lux wrote:

Rick Rosstrich wrote:That is not luck, my friend.

Then neither is Chelsea scoring more goals.

For me, you make your own luck. Chelsea scoring a goal then not wanting Barcelona to get an away goal is obvious. If Barcelona cannot score, that is because they were the worse team on the night. Was there any dodgy referee decisions for Chelsea or against Barcelona? Nothing in-particular.

Barcelona were the better team by a country mile.

Right, so me thinking that a team who wins without bad officiating deserves it makes me a prick?