Rick Rosstrich wrote:Mustangt125 wrote:So what is the reason Cech wasn't given a red? He took out a striker who had beaten him.
I understand the advantage and they ended up scoring....but if that happened at midfield and it was cardable they would go back and card the midfielder. Cech should have been sent off
You should walk to your toilet, stick your head in it then flush.
Mustangt125 wrote:Rick Rosstrich wrote:Mustangt125 wrote:So what is the reason Cech wasn't given a red? He took out a striker who had beaten him.
I understand the advantage and they ended up scoring....but if that happened at midfield and it was cardable they would go back and card the midfielder. Cech should have been sent off
You should walk to your toilet, stick your head in it then flush.
Uh,...no I shouldn't. Good one you douchebag. Back to the drawing board fella
luke. wrote:L. wrote:
He got you to reply though, didn't he?
It's funny, cause if it was me trying to wind Liverpool fans up you'd be one of the first to start crying.
And you know that's true.
L. wrote:Rick Rosstrich wrote:
As usual. What a great success it was too.
He got you to reply though, didn't he?
Mata's celebration for a clear non goal is also cheating. Like Young making a theatrical fall. Both deceive officials.
Rick Rosstrich wrote:Mustangt125 wrote:So what is the reason Cech wasn't given a red? He took out a striker who had beaten him.
I understand the advantage and they ended up scoring....but if that happened at midfield and it was cardable they would go back and card the midfielder. Cech should have been sent off
You should walk to your toilet, stick your head in it then flush.
What?moscowmadeit3 wrote:Mata's celebration for a clear non goal is also cheating. Like Young making a theatrical fall. Both deceive officials.
Interesting point that.
Mata got a goal and celebrated it, Young just flat out dived, it's not comparable whatsoever. Gatsby wrote:L. wrote:
He got you to reply though, didn't he?
What a master of psychology he is
moscowmadeit3 wrote:Mata's celebration for a clear non goal is also cheating. Like Young making a theatrical fall. Both deceive officials.
Interesting point that.
moscowmadeit3 wrote:Mata's celebration for a clear non goal is also cheating. Like Young making a theatrical fall. Both deceive officials.
Interesting point that.
Gatsby wrote:Why are you being a pissy little bitch Cam?
will gif and make artistic when a clip goes on youtube 
moscowmadeit3 wrote:Mata's celebration for a clear non goal is also cheating. Like Young making a theatrical fall. Both deceive officials.
Interesting point that.
easley91 wrote:Chelsea were the better side, but 5-1 was really harsh IMO. We hit the post and had the ball cleared off the line (which by the way was probably closer to being in the goal than the one given at THAT end for Chelsea). I don't think we played badly just didn't create the chances in the second half. Can't do anything about Drogba's and Lampard's goals, for Malouda's and Ramires' we were just tired and not concentrating at the back. As for the second Chelsea goal, just watched ITV's post match analysis and they had a virtual view from the ref's point of view and NOTHING is in his way. How the fuck can he give that?! Cech could've been sent off for our goal, but I reckon one ref may have sent him off on another day with the goal. The Luiz injury didn't help us after we scored either, because that did stop our momentum. If the game kicked off straight away after the goal we would've been in full flow like we did after we got a goal back up at City. Things didn't go our way today, but I guess that is football.
Will write a full review tomorrow, because if I do it tonight it's just going to be full of swear words.
It won't. Chelsea did have the better chances and took them. Chelsea didn't completely outplay us to the extent of 5-1. A couple of world class goals, two clinical finishes at the end when our old defenders were tired so Chelsea picked us off. The better team did win, just think one decision could've made a massive difference and the scoreline is flattering. It suggests it was a hammering, which it wasn't.luke. wrote:easley91 wrote:Chelsea were the better side, but 5-1 was really harsh IMO. We hit the post and had the ball cleared off the line (which by the way was probably closer to being in the goal than the one given at THAT end for Chelsea). I don't think we played badly just didn't create the chances in the second half. Can't do anything about Drogba's and Lampard's goals, for Malouda's and Ramires' we were just tired and not concentrating at the back. As for the second Chelsea goal, just watched ITV's post match analysis and they had a virtual view from the ref's point of view and NOTHING is in his way. How the fuck can he give that?! Cech could've been sent off for our goal, but I reckon one ref may have sent him off on another day with the goal. The Luiz injury didn't help us after we scored either, because that did stop our momentum. If the game kicked off straight away after the goal we would've been in full flow like we did after we got a goal back up at City. Things didn't go our way today, but I guess that is football.
Will write a full review tomorrow, because if I do it tonight it's just going to be full of swear words.
It'll be biased in Spurs favour anyway so there's not much point in writing a review.
Moose wrote:YID ARMYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
