Chat Thread

Yea Peter, her imagination is great, but her writing isnt exactly riviting.

Oh god, Blade's back to lecture us about the finer areas of the talking pictures.

Scott. wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Why must I clarify for you what you already know?

Because I don't know.

Proceed to clarify.

Playing dumb?

Some things never change.

BladeGunner wrote:

Jordo wrote:

I don't know wether you seen this the other day. So I will post it again.

Kirsten Stewart is a fine young actress. Don't let the bullshit she's forced to do in Twilight put you off. I suggest you watch Adventureland or The Runaways before making such judgements about her acting ability.

Bullshit, I watched that snow white thing she was in and she was terrible in it too.

Sean wrote:Yea Peter, her imagination is great, but her writing isnt exactly riviting.

TBH, she wrote it for teenagers.

Glen Damon wrote:

Scott. wrote:

Because I don't know.

Proceed to clarify.

Playing dumb?

Some things never change.

Except I genuinely don't know what you're on about. So please, clarify, unless you're talking full of shit.

BladeGunner wrote:

Rei Andros wrote:Only 3 of the Harry Potter films were actually good.


Come at me, bro.

Let me guess, Prisoner of Azkaban and the last two?

POA was one, the first one is the other, and the last is Goblet of Fire. The last two were decent but had nowhere close to the impact of the books IMO.

Danno wrote:Oh god, Blade's back to lecture us about the finer areas of the talking pictures.

He is the forum's residential movie fanatic.

Yet I still beat him in that category on PRICKS.

Rei Andros wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Let me guess, Prisoner of Azkaban and the last two?

POA was one, the first one is the other, and the last is Goblet of Fire. The last two were decent but had nowhere close to the impact of the books IMO.

When has a film ever been better than the book?

Leave Scott alone, Glen.

Goblet of Fire was my favourite movie and book.

Scott. wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:Playing dumb?

Some things never change.

Except I genuinely don't know what you're on about. So please, clarify, unless you're talking full of shit.

I have nothing further to say on the matter. I expect developments on the morrow.

Rei Andros wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Let me guess, Prisoner of Azkaban and the last two?

POA was one, the first one is the other, and the last is Goblet of Fire. The last two were decent but had nowhere close to the impact of the books IMO.

The Goblet of Fire? That is honestly one of the worst films I have ever seen.

Because you have nothing to say.

Sean wrote:

BladeGunner wrote:

Kirsten Stewart is a fine young actress. Don't let the bullshit she's forced to do in Twilight put you off. I suggest you watch Adventureland or The Runaways before making such judgements about her acting ability.

Bullshit, I watched that snow white thing she was in and she was terrible in it too.

You watched it before it was released?

Might start reading the Harry Potter books again.

Night.

ahlycotc wrote:Leave Scott alone, Glen.

I was joking. But then he continued to be defensive, so I went along with it.

Scott. wrote:Because you have nothing to say.

I have lots to say.

ahlycotc wrote:

Danno wrote:Oh god, Blade's back to lecture us about the finer areas of the talking pictures.

He is the forum's residential movie fanatic.

Yet I still beat him in that category on PRICKS.

Give it a rest, ahly. You hadn't even heard of The Sound of Music.

@Jordo: It's a losing battle for a film to even try to be better than a book. The best a director can hope for is to match its impact. I could argue that LOTR: TFOR is a better movie than it is a book. I'm 156 pages into re-reading the book and they still haven't left The Shire. Tom fucking Bombadil.

@Sean: Don't worry, I loved all the books. I grew up with them, man.

@Glenn: Different strokes I guess.

Snow White and the Huntsman should be good.

BladeGunner wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

He is the forum's residential movie fanatic.

Yet I still beat him in that category on PRICKS.

Give it a rest, ahly. You hadn't even heard of The Sound of Music.

It's getting personal.

BladeGunner wrote:

Sean wrote:

Bullshit, I watched that snow white thing she was in and she was terrible in it too.

You watched it before it was released?

Yea, Im pretty sure I watched it online, unless theres another film about Snow White and I just imagined it to be Kristen Stewart?

Rei Andros wrote:@Jordo: It's a losing battle for a film to even try to better than a book. The best a director can hope for is to match it's impact.

@Sean: Don't worry, I loved all the books. I grew up with them, man.

@Glenn: Different strokes I guess.

I haven't seen it in years, honestly.

I think a lot of it had to do with the fact that they all had ridiculous mops of hair.

Hello.

Glen Damon wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:Leave Scott alone, Glen.

I was joking. But then he continued to be defensive, so I went along with it.

Scott. wrote:Because you have nothing to say.

I have lots to say.

What's defensive about asking you to explain what you meant?

Spoiler:

You know what I can't like about Harry Potter or better yet why I really don't like about Harry Potter? The fact that it takes place in modern times. I mean these mother fuckers are fighting wizards and witches and shit with lightning bolts and shit, but your a wizard, can't you just whip up a motha fuckin' AK and unload on the forces of Evil?

Okay, lets just remove the forces of evil entirely, you then have a typical teenage drama but with teenagers that can do magic. Basically it's Cartoon Networks Tower Prep.

The Sound of Music and The King and I are the only musicals I can actually stand. Everything else I turn off.

When I was over at my aunt's house last year and they asked me to try to watch Mamma Mia!

BladeGunner wrote:

ahlycotc wrote:

He is the forum's residential movie fanatic.

Yet I still beat him in that category on PRICKS.

Give it a rest, ahly. You hadn't even heard of The Sound of Music.

Yeah I did. I watched the movie about 8 years ago. I just got stuck on the quiz.

Danny wrote:Hello.

Too early to have just woken up, too late to announce yourself so readily. So tell me Danny what are your motives behind popping in to say hello at this late hour?

Scott. wrote:

Glen Damon wrote:I was joking. But then he continued to be defensive, so I went along with it.

I have lots to say.

What's defensive about asking you to explain what you meant?

I seem to recall you calling me your "precious fanboy," which is on one level a complete twisting of the truth, and on another level a subtle jibe trying to turn the table on me.

A counter attack, if you will.