Suarez Hate Thread

Eternal Witcher wrote:So....it would have been a miss, doesn't mean he wasn't desperate to catch the ball. He only looked at Parker after he had begun the movement. Most here want this to be a deliberate kick. Obviously I would want it to be otherwise, but it's still ambiguous.

He bumps into Parker at the start of the gif though, he obviously knew he was there.

Zzonked wrote:

Eternal Witcher wrote:So....it would have been a miss, doesn't mean he wasn't desperate to catch the ball. He only looked at Parker after he had begun the movement. Most here want this to be a deliberate kick. Obviously I would want it to be otherwise, but it's still ambiguous.

He bumps into Parker at the start of the gif though, he obviously knew he was there.

So because Parker is there, Suarez can't shoot?

To be honest Balotelli's stamp was much worse I don't remember seeing 3 threads to discuss that here.Its a god damn mental block on everybody taking it so far and getting all crazy because it was Luis Suarez, had somebody else done it there would not be such a fuss.

Sheep, that's why. Sheep.



But that is not what this thread is for, let us hate.

drivescore wrote:To be honest Balotelli's stamp was much worse I don't remember seeing 3 threads to discuss that here.Its a god damn mental block on everybody taking it so far and getting all crazy because it was Luis Suarez, had somebody else done it there would not be such a fuss.

All the threads opened were made by the same 3 people

RR, Chris and Eternal Witcher.

drivescore wrote:To be honest Balotelli's stamp was much worse I don't remember seeing 3 threads to discuss that here.Its a god damn mental block on everybody taking it so far and getting all crazy because it was Luis Suarez, had somebody else done it there would not be such a fuss.

There was a thread for Balotelli on that, there is a thread for the Suarez boot, but Eternal decided to make a general one too. I think it's debatable whether the Balotelli one was worse and he was punished for it anyway.

Did the ref see it or do anything about Suarez' kick here?

Zzonked wrote:

drivescore wrote:To be honest Balotelli's stamp was much worse I don't remember seeing 3 threads to discuss that here.Its a god damn mental block on everybody taking it so far and getting all crazy because it was Luis Suarez, had somebody else done it there would not be such a fuss.

There was a thread for Balotelli on that, there is a thread for the Suarez boot, but Eternal decided to make a general one too. I think it's debatable whether the Balotelli one was worse and he was punished for it anyway.

Did the ref see it or do anything about Suarez' kick here?

Balotelli one was much worse, could of caused him brain damage and ended his career, intentional aswell

And the ref booked him, so no ban

What about the eye incident, the ref took no action there.

You can't ban someone for accidentally putting your finger in someones eye

Why would he put his hand any where near Parker's face in the first place?

Jordi wrote:Why would he put his hand any where near Parker's face in the first place?

Because he's trying to get the ball, look at the picture, it's not like he's looking at Parker, his eyes are on the ball

Benitez wrote:

Zzonked wrote:

He bumps into Parker at the start of the gif though, he obviously knew he was there.

So because Parker is there, Suarez can't shoot?

You don't just attempt to kick that high, if the ball is above head height, with an opposition player in the flight path of the ball.

Stupid decision from Suarez.

Benitez wrote:

Jordi wrote:Why would he put his hand any where near Parker's face in the first place?

Because he's trying to get the ball, look at the picture, it's not like he's looking at Parker, his eyes are on the ball

And his index and middle fingers in Parker's eye, you cannot put them there, and get away with it, accidental or not.

Steadman wrote:

Benitez wrote:

So because Parker is there, Suarez can't shoot?

You don't just attempt to kick that high, if the ball is above head height, with an opposition player in the flight path of the ball.

Stupid decision from Suarez.

No it wasn't a stupid decision, just because Parker was there doesn't mean he can't shoot, it wasn't that high anyway.

Benitez wrote:

Steadman wrote:
You don't just attempt to kick that high, if the ball is above head height, with an opposition player in the flight path of the ball.

Stupid decision from Suarez.

No it wasn't a stupid decision, just because Parker was there doesn't mean he can't shoot, it wasn't that high anyway.

He knew Parker was in the path of the ball, he must've known that attempting to swing for the ball would lead to him kicking Parker. Did he think Parker would move out of the way and let him shoot?

Steadman wrote:

Benitez wrote:

No it wasn't a stupid decision, just because Parker was there doesn't mean he can't shoot, it wasn't that high anyway.

He knew Parker was in the path of the ball, he must've known that attempting to swing for the ball would lead to him kicking Parker. Did he think Parker would move out of the way and let him shoot?

As i said before, Suarez isn't just going to stand there and let an oppotunity to score go just because Parker is there.

Benitez wrote:

Steadman wrote:

Benitez wrote:

So because Parker is there, Suarez can't shoot?

You don't just attempt to kick that high, if the ball is above head height, with an opposition player in the flight path of the ball.

Stupid decision from Suarez.

No it wasn't a stupid decision, just because Parker was there doesn't mean he can't shoot, it wasn't that high anyway.

You are comedy gold.

So he'll assault him instead, seems reasonable.

Benitez wrote:

Steadman wrote:
He knew Parker was in the path of the ball, he must've known that attempting to swing for the ball would lead to him kicking Parker. Did he think Parker would move out of the way and let him shoot?

As i said before, Suarez isn't just going to stand there and let an oppotunity to score go just because Parker is there.

I give up.

Steadman wrote:

Benitez wrote:

Steadman wrote:
He knew Parker was in the path of the ball, he must've known that attempting to swing for the ball would lead to him kicking Parker. Did he think Parker would move out of the way and let him shoot?

As i said before, Suarez isn't just going to stand there and let an oppotunity to score go just because Parker is there.

I give up.

He tweeted an Arsenal fan yesterday calling him a clueless cunt because negrito isn't racist in Uruguay.

This is a guy who used to troll Arsenal fans and used to have pictures of Ramsey's leg break as his sig and ava. He can't even take a little back. Pathetic.

Jordi wrote:So he'll assault him instead, seems reasonable.

No, it wasn't intentional assault, like this.



The ball was coming down, but Parker got it away, if not Suarez would of shot

Mal wrote:

Steadman wrote:
I give up.

He tweeted an Arsenal fan yesterday calling him a clueless cunt because negrito isn't racist in Uruguay.

This is a guy who used to troll Arsenal fans and used to have pictures of Ramsey's leg break as his sig and ava. He can't even take a little back. Pathetic.

That was because he got mixed up between Negro and Negrito

Benitez wrote:

Mal wrote:

He tweeted an Arsenal fan yesterday calling him a clueless cunt because negrito isn't racist in Uruguay.

This is a guy who used to troll Arsenal fans and used to have pictures of Ramsey's leg break as his sig and ava. He can't even take a little back. Pathetic.

That was because he got mixed up between Negro and Negrito

Negro is equally as racist in Uruguay as Negrito

That is to say, if used in the right context, not at all.

Leo is a nice guy sometimes but he does make a fool out of himself a lot
Needs to stop calling everyone the n bomb in my haxball lobbies though

Mal wrote:

Steadman wrote:
I give up.

He tweeted an Arsenal fan yesterday calling him a clueless cunt because negrito isn't racist in Uruguay.

This is a guy who used to troll Arsenal fans and used to have pictures of Ramsey's leg break as his sig and ava. He can't even take a little back. Pathetic.

To be quite honest with you it is not an offensive word here.There are many very insulting Spanish words, but negrito is very far from being one of them and without understanding the context of the word in South America you can't judge Suarez on it.

drivescore wrote:

Mal wrote:

He tweeted an Arsenal fan yesterday calling him a clueless cunt because negrito isn't racist in Uruguay.

This is a guy who used to troll Arsenal fans and used to have pictures of Ramsey's leg break as his sig and ava. He can't even take a little back. Pathetic.

To be quite honest with you it is not an offensive word here.There are many very insulting Spanish words, but negrito is very far from being one of them and without understanding the context of the word in South America you can't judge Suarez on it.

Doesn't even matter as he, by his own admission said "Negro". According to the statement he gave mariner he said "por que tu es negro".

drivescore wrote:

Mal wrote:

Steadman wrote:
I give up.

He tweeted an Arsenal fan yesterday calling him a clueless cunt because negrito isn't racist in Uruguay.

This is a guy who used to troll Arsenal fans and used to have pictures of Ramsey's leg break as his sig and ava. He can't even take a little back. Pathetic.

To be quite honest with you it is not an offensive word here.There are many very insulting Spanish words, but negrito is very far from being one of them and without understanding the context of the word in South America you can't judge Suarez on it.

That doesn't matter. c0on might not be a racist term in New Zealand (random) but that doesn't mean a New Zealander can come to England and start calling black people c0ons. It doesn't work like that.

And as Laurencio pointed out, Suarez said negro.

Mal wrote:

drivescore wrote:

To be quite honest with you it is not an offensive word here.There are many very insulting Spanish words, but negrito is very far from being one of them and without understanding the context of the word in South America you can't judge Suarez on it.

That doesn't matter. c0on might not be a racist term in New Zealand (random) but that doesn't mean a New Zealander can come to England and start callign black people c0ons. It doesn't work like that.

Yes and I have nothing against the ban but calling Suarez a racist without knowing the meaning is absurd, he can't use the word in any context in England and deserves a ban even if he did not mean to say it in a racist context.He was banned for using the word not the context, you can't call him racist.

Love how bitter Liverpool fans are If he was an United player they'd react exactly the same.

I would post a 'not sure if srs' picture at Leo's posts but I know he is oh so serious.