This got me thinking, that's some bollocks. We've proved over 46 games that we are the better over the course of the league. And that's what it is, isn't it? A league? Saying the best of two teams should replace 2 of the 3 worst teams in the above league, but any of the four below those two could follow them sort of makes a mockery of the whole league system.
I believe the best 3 teams in the league should replace the 3 worst teams of the higher league.
Or why not have an opposite play off for relegation? So like in League 1 the teams who finish 18th-21st meet up in two semi finals. The two losers face each other in an ultimate loser final. The defeated team join the teams 22nd-24th in getting relegated to the league beneath them.
Thoughts?