Would you want your rivals to go out of business?

No. I look forward to the laughs they provide each year, especially in the Libertadores.

No, they might be doing good now but that's gonna end soon and then....

Cristiano wrote:No, they might be doing good now but that's gonna end soon and then....

Good username is good.

kyro7 wrote:

Cristiano wrote:No, they might be doing good now but that's gonna end soon and then....

Good username is good.

good sig is good.

NZG wrote:

kyro7 wrote:Good username is good.

good sig is good.

This.

Absolutely. They wanted us "out of business," and did it through devious means, yet they failed and went unpunished. However, they did succeed in obtaining a free scudetto, destroying the competition and therefore built a platform of success that allowed them to eventually go on and win a treble.

--

Italian football would be much better without Inter.

*Not counting Torino and other rivals because they're fun to have around.

Burnley haven't beaten us in 33+ years so not really arsed.

For the good of Mexican football, yes.

Only Club America though, Atlas aren't a disgusting organization really, just a rivalry.

No way. It would not be as fun without Zamalek and Real Madrid. They are rivals, not sworn enemies.

If Zamalek went out of business, what would happen in Egypt? Would Ahly just win every year?

Lus Suarez wrote:If Zamalek went out of business, what would happen in Egypt? Would Ahly just win every year?

They already do.

Fuck that to be honest. I'm glad Mexico has a new champion pretty much every year.

Yah, I really enjoy a competitive league, and I am glad my league is competitive.

No, that's a horrible thing to happen.

No,good to have panathinaikos around,they are the laughing stock of europe lately.

Nope, but if it happened I wouldn't cry either.

No. The Greek league would be even worse.

Yes. With the whole derby days, we don't play them enough for it to matter.

No, I'd probably miss the derby games and competition after long enough.

No to Dale and Bolton we can laugh when Dale go down and Bolton go down this season as well then Bury will swiftly get in the Premier League in 2 seasons.

Im half and half, i would want Villa to go out of business purely because i hate them that much however the matches against them and the banter with the fans is brilliant and i would miss it.

No, that would just be boring. I want them to suffer, not disappear completely.

I wouldn't get rid of any football team. Not having a derby makes football worse.

kyro7 wrote:

Dan wrote:

40 is bigger that 37 my friend.

That's not it for me, just how you were so dominant and Fergie changed it. And we've been dominating for 20 years.

Excuse me, my friend. This is only because Kenny left Liverpool.

I wouldn't want them to go out of buisness i'd just want them to be doing really shit.

No, football is about rivalry and without the Gooner scum bags it would be a much more boring place. The North London Derby is dramatic, nerve racking and a great experience if we win - without Arsenal it would take a lot away from the enjoyment of football.

Edit: I would like Man City, Chelsea and other teams that get bought by billionaires and ruin the transfer market and the league for teams who try to do it the right way to go out of business. Artificially putting yourselves top of the league by financial doping is wrong and it would be good if they went under.

Dan wrote:Man United yes. Everton no.

This, because Man Utd are title contenders whereas Everton aren't. As long as your rival is worse, I wouldn't want them to collapse

100% yes

The Maestro wrote:100% yes

Celtic rely on Rangers to such a massive degree that if they went out of business the Scottish league would lose any sort of interest and investment. The money made from the old firm derby's is so important.

Naa we enjoy beating them, it would be worse to have the rent boys as rivals anyway

Lus Suarez wrote:If Zamalek went out of business, what would happen in Egypt? Would Ahly just win every year?

We already win every year.