Jorlung wrote:Well you certainly care about being on a club, which both of those qualities are more likely than not the biggest factors, more so the first one.
I do indeed.
Jorlung wrote:Well you certainly care about being on a club, which both of those qualities are more likely than not the biggest factors, more so the first one.
Theo Filippo wrote:Oh right nobody.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:
I shall not name.
Well then in turn, you should care about people not liking you and being shit at clubs.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:Jorlung wrote:Well you certainly care about being on a club, which both of those qualities are more likely than not the biggest factors, more so the first one.
I do indeed.
Jorlung wrote:Well then in turn, you should care about people not liking you and being shit at clubs.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:
I do indeed.
SBSP wrote:Stop ruining everything.
You are completely missing the point... I'll spell it out for you. The main qualification for joining a club or any sort of group is that the people in that group or club at least like you to some extent, and you are good at what the group or club is trying to accomplish. Which apparently you don't care if the group doesn't like you and you don't care if you're shit at what the group is doing.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:Jorlung wrote:Well then in turn, you should care about people not liking you and being shit at clubs.
No. Also I don't care about being good, it's a fucking game. It isn't going to affect me when I'm older is it?
Jorlung wrote:You are completely missing the point... I'll spell it out for you. The main qualification for joining a club or any sort of group is that the people in that group or club at least like you to some extent, and you are good at what the group or club is trying to accomplish. Which apparently you don't care if the group doesn't like you and you don't care if you're shit at what the group is doing.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:
No. Also I don't care about being good, it's a fucking game. It isn't going to affect me when I'm older is it?
Take this philosophy into the workplace. You're trying get into a job involving chemistry, and you're doing a placement at a lab lets say. But you are mouthing off to all of the other chemists and none of them like you, and you apparently don't know shit all about chemistry. Does this look like a winning situation to you "when you're older?"
SBSP wrote:That was to everyone.
SBSP wrote:No, my post.
Yes but in your situation you are not Messi (ie. An obvious improvement to the team) and it is more than "some" players in your situation. Yes and if you keep playing you will improve, but you clearly stated that you do not care about how good you are at clubs, which implies that you have no desire to improve.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:Jorlung wrote:You are completely missing the point... I'll spell it out for you. The main qualification for joining a club or any sort of group is that the people in that group or club at least like you to some extent, and you are good at what the group or club is trying to accomplish. Which apparently you don't care if the group doesn't like you and you don't care if you're shit at what the group is doing.
Take this philosophy into the workplace. You're trying get into a job involving chemistry, and you're doing a placement at a lab lets say. But you are mouthing off to all of the other chemists and none of them like you, and you apparently don't know shit all about chemistry. Does this look like a winning situation to you "when you're older?"
Not true. For instance, if Manchester City had a chance to sign Messi, but some of the players did not like him, does this mean they would not sign him? You do not have to be good at something from the start, if you keep playing you will gradually improve. I may not be very good now, but the only way I can improve is by playing.
Do you think the very best football players were amazing at football straight away? No they weren't, they had to play to get better.
Jorlung wrote:Yes but in your situation you are not Messi (ie. An obvious improvement to the team) and it is more than "some" players in your situation. Yes and if you keep playing you will improve, but you clearly stated that you do not care about how good you are at clubs, which implies that you have no desire to improve.Mason_Inzaghi wrote:
Not true. For instance, if Manchester City had a chance to sign Messi, but some of the players did not like him, does this mean they would not sign him? You do not have to be good at something from the start, if you keep playing you will gradually improve. I may not be very good now, but the only way I can improve is by playing.
Do you think the very best football players were amazing at football straight away? No they weren't, they had to play to get better.
Jordi wrote:I'll take over.