Manchester United FC Official Thread

i hate this "we always bounce back", how about we dont bounce back and we just win at 2-2 tha attitude of some players were disgusting, as if we were 4-2 up. they stopped trying

10RLegend wrote:

ViVaRooney wrote:

read the whole post will you... exactly, without service he is useless and because we had a depleted side and nani off form he was useless to us, we needed more creativity and contribution and since hernandez has zero of that he had to go off. i dont know what your point is tbh, you just pretty much given reasons why hernandez should be taken off (lack of good service). again.. we scored 2 goals after he went off, he was far from the problem. do you honestly think we would have won had park went off instead of hernandez? if that had happened we wouldnt have seen Valencia at RM who set up our goals(since welbeck would be stuck outwide instead) ...you are stupid.

How you're blaming Hernandez for the lack of service from his teammates is beyond me. I believe we certainly wouldn't have lost if he wasn't subbed off. People say it was good move, yet we lost not just because of defense and GK, also the attack played like shit.

serious right now? are you that dumb that i need to spell it out for you?

who is blaming hernandez? but when there is no service he is useless, so why the fuck play him!! he adds nothing to our build up and today we needed someone up top that can play football, thats why he had to go off.

just cause he scores tap ins doesnt mean he is the right choice to play, cause when he doesnt score he does nothing. welbeck and berba was far more effective then hernandez can ever be in this type of game. as said with players missing it was more important then ever to have players forward who can get involved in the build up.

we wouldnt have lost with hernandez? wow.. so 45 mins with hernandez = 0 goals, 45 mins without hernandez = 2 goals but you come to the conclusion that hernandez would have won us the game?? you are special kind of crazy. as said it was the defense that cost us cause we gave away cheap goals that we would never give away with our proper defenders, so 2 goals would have been enough in normal circumstances

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

CM Monk wrote:So dropped because he had dinner with his wife

Absolutely absurd decision, unfortunately that's something we've come to expect recently.

So Ferguson being a cunt has cost United at the very least a point.

I'd say 3. You don't drop your best player, even if you get away with it once. Would TSO ever drop Ronaldo? Would Guardiola ever drop Messi or Xavi? Would Capello ever drop Rooney? Would Ancelotti or Hiddink ever have dropped Drogba? Of course not.

Yes just sack Fergie he does not know what he is doing.

As if he didn't play because of that.

"Throws his future into doubt". Fuck off Sportsmail.

CM Monk wrote:So dropped because he had dinner with his wife

Ah, the old club crest breaking in half, we're fucked.

Danny, don't you think it puts his future into doubt if there's conflict between him and Ferguson? Ferguson has discarded better players as important to the side as Rooney because of his own massive ego.

Power and control.

If its true, it won't throw his future into doubt.

Thanks Wayne, threw my Fantasy team into disarray.

Danny wrote:If its true, it won't throw his future into doubt.

If Ferguson is dropping him for pathetic reasons and dragging the team downhill then it certainly does put his future into doubt. Moreover, if Ferguson holds some grudge against Rooney, like he has done with numerous other players, that also puts his future in doubt.

If it came to it, who would you rather we kept hold of? In my view, which is correct, Ferguson is replaceable while Rooney isn't, as far as United are concerned. No player of Rooney's calibre will want to sign for a club with no world class players, but plenty of managers would love to take over at Manchester United after Ferguson.

Vidic.

Danny wrote:Vidic.

Forget about Vidic, he is fucked, and nobody knows if he will be the same player when he returns. Even if he is, he's not available, and he won't have all that long left when he gets back anyway.

Let's be honest though, this is pretty much the same paper that said Smalling would be out for 3 months a few days ago, when he's fucking got tonsillitis.

But when they report something which gives you the opportunity to attack Fergie (as if you need an invitation) you don't even begin to question it's credibility.

He won't leave/be forced out because he went out for a fucking meal.

Danny wrote:Let's be honest though, this is pretty much the same paper that said Smalling would be out for 3 months a few days ago, when he's fucking got tonsillitis.

But when they report something which gives you the opportunity to attack Fergie (as if you need an invitation) you don't even begin to question it's credibility.

He won't leave/be forced out because he went out for a fucking meal.

No, he'll be forced out because he won't obey Ferguson's every command, or he'll leave because he no longer has faith in Ferguson. Don't forget the Champions League Final, where Ferguson and Rooney were seen arguing, with Ferguson telling Rooney that he knew what he was doing.

While the Smalling story was an attempt to fill column inches, I can't see why they would go with this story if it was not true. On a day when Chelsea got murdered at home by Aston Villa, United got beat by Blackburn Rovers, and Andre Villas Boas' job appearing to be under threat, why would they lead with a fictional story on their back page? It doesn't make sense.

They don't usually go with something big about a match from the previous dy because of the separate sports pull out inside.

Danny wrote:They don't usually go with something big about a match from the previous dy because of the separate sports pull out inside.

OK, so what about the Suarez case?

No idea, don't care either. Rooney won't leave because of this.

RR you are the most pathetic person i have ever come across

I love Evra too much, it's not good, because he's declined massively and we should have a much better lb but I don't want Pat gone.

And if Rooney was to be pushed out, where the fuck will he go.

No one can afford him with FFP coming into effect.

It's a non story anyway, he wont be pushed out.

kyro7 wrote:It's a non story anyway, he wont be pushed out.

Ino.

I was just stating the obvious.

if rooney was not pushed out for rejecting a contract then saying "this club lacks ambition", he isnt gonna get pushed out for havin a dinner with his wife FFS i bet that wasnt even the reason he didnt play, its a chance for the media to make shit up and as always they will

De Gea needs to GTFO of goal. That will solve half of our problems. Lindegaard should have been the starting goalie months ago. The other half of United's problems is the fact that our only half decent creative midfielder has been out for months.

SAF does some serious spending (Modric or Sneijder or Gotze, etc.) or we are not winning the league. Simple as that.

i dont get it, when everyone is back we have more then enough to win the league.. last week we win 5-0 with a bad team and you all get spoilt. there is no need to overspend in january and bring in someone we dont really want just for the sake of it, just wait till the summer.

the likes of sneijder and modric will never leave in january so if you want someone in january the quality of the signing will need to be considerably lower

New year, same old shit.