Wenger Ranked Manager of the Decade by FIFA

Bergkamp wrote:

menalawyerguy wrote:

Bergkamp wrote:I'm not firing insults around, I was asking if you are mentally challenged. It's annoying that i can't be sarcastic without people firing a story at me trying to prove why I'm wrong.

Oh ok. It was an honest question. Right. Yes, I probably am mentally challenged. I repeatedly subject myself to petulant twats like you instead if ignoring them like I should. That suggests a certain type of mental disfunction on my part for sure.

I'll just say it one more time in case you yourself are mentally challenged as well: it wasn't the Fergie winning two decades in a row comment that I was responding to.

It actually was a genuine question

What the fuck are you moaning about then?

blackskar wrote:Using the Luke logic.

Is SAF deserved to win it, he would have.

coolmarvin wrote:Pretty sure it's based, mainly, on the financial aspects, in which case no one can argue he should be first.

Although why they felt the need to make an official poll is beyond me. It's pretty obvious he would be first.

Bergkamp wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Pretty sure it's based, mainly, on the financial aspects, in which case no one can argue he should be first.

Although why they felt the need to make an official poll is beyond me. It's pretty obvious he would be first.

Coolmarvin

blackskar wrote:How dare you. Luke is the benchmark we all strive to reach in footballing knowledge.

These figures have been compiled by the IFFTS by the votes every year for the “Top 20″ of The World‘s best National Coach and the “Top 20″ of The World‘s best Club Coach. Each year has been allocated 10% of the tally towards the final rankings. This is because some coaches have been club coaches in some years, and international coaches in other years.

coolmarvin wrote:

Bergkamp wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Pretty sure it's based, mainly, on the financial aspects, in which case no one can argue he should be first.

Although why they felt the need to make an official poll is beyond me. It's pretty obvious he would be first.

Coolmarvin

'Sup.

Bergkamp wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:

Bergkamp wrote:

coolmarvin wrote:Pretty sure it's based, mainly, on the financial aspects, in which case no one can argue he should be first.

Although why they felt the need to make an official poll is beyond me. It's pretty obvious he would be first.

Coolmarvin

'Sup.

How random that you commented on my video on Youtube. It was meant to be.

The-Reporter wrote:Some people just don't know how to say "Well Done".

Its obviously not all about trophies, its about how you get them. In Mourinho's case he really bought 2 premier league titles, people were shook to see such a bench and first team when he started spending.

Fergie has probably spent over £200M on players since 2000.

kyro7 wrote:

The-Reporter wrote:Some people just don't know how to say "Well Done".

Its obviously not all about trophies, its about how you get them. In Mourinho's case he really bought 2 premier league titles, people were shook to see such a bench and first team when he started spending.

Fergie has probably spent over £200M on players since 2000.

I said congratulations.

Wenger > all.

luke. wrote:4 Chelsea managers in the top 10

Dan wrote:

luke. wrote:4 Chelsea managers in the top 10

You had about seven throughout the decade though..