The Atheist Thread

    Share
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:38 am

    Splashy wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    Surely it's equally irrational to be 100% certain that there is no god as well then?
    No because scientist's etc put forawrd evidence to support our non-belief.

    What has religion got, An ancient book? Neutral

    Science has not put forward any evidence to disprove god. It's put forward evidence to make a god unlikely but there is nothing out there that 100% proves there is no god.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:38 am

    Zzonked wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:

    Which is false. There is plenty of reasoning and thinking behind religion. Even if we were to assume that all religions were created by man, a lot of reasoning and thinking went into it.

    I'm calling religious belief irrational because there is no factual reasoning that suggest that god exists. Do you deny that any argument comes down to faith then?

    There are several theories out there as to how the universe was created the way it was. Some people believe that God was responsible. Others might think we are one in an infinite numbers of universes. Others have different theories. I find holes in other all the theories for the creation of the universe (that I have heard of so far) and so the God theory makes the most sense to me.

    The belief in a God requires as much faith as the belief in the multiverse theory for example. You can't prove or disprove the multiverse theory, just as you can't prove or disprove God. Yet there seems to be a double standard. People who believe in a God are treated like crazy people, while people who hold the multiverse theory aren't.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:39 am

    Zzonked wrote:I don't understand the point you're trying to make. Are you saying that they had terrible information thousands of years ago and that's what the bible is based on? Doesn't that just give you even less reason behind taking it as fact?
    The Bible's lessons are timeless, hence why millions still believe in its truth to this day.
    avatar
    MickStupp
     
     

    Posts : 1933
    Age : 25
    Location : Glasgow

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by MickStupp on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:41 am

    ahlycotc wrote:
    Zzonked wrote:

    I'm calling religious belief irrational because there is no factual reasoning that suggest that god exists. Do you deny that any argument comes down to faith then?

    There are several theories out there as to how the universe was created the way it was. Some people believe that God was responsible. Others might think we are one in an infinite numbers of universes. Others have different theories. I find holes in other all the theories for the creation of the universe (that I have heard of so far) and so the God theory makes the most sense to me.

    The belief in a God requires as much faith as the belief in the multiverse theory for example. You can't prove or disprove the multiverse theory, just as you can't prove or disprove God. Yet there seems to be a double standard. People who believe in a God are treated like crazy people, while people who hold the multiverse theory aren't.
    But that's when you have to take into account the difference between theism and deism. You can't disprove deism, but you can find holes in theistic theories.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:42 am

    MickStupp wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    Plenty of people are certain there is no god. You don't see people questioning their intelligence though.
    Like who? I would certainly challenge their beliefs, since they cannot prove definitively that there is no god. But the vast majority of atheists have a degree of agnosticism.

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.
    avatar
    SBSP
     
     

    Posts : 50005

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by SBSP on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:42 am

    Sarmz wrote:
    MickStupp wrote:
    Like who? I would certainly challenge their beliefs, since they cannot prove definitively that there is no god. But the vast majority of atheists have a degree of agnosticism.

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.
    No, not Dan.
    avatar
    MickStupp
     
     

    Posts : 1933
    Age : 25
    Location : Glasgow

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by MickStupp on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:43 am

    InGlennyWeTrust wrote:
    Zzonked wrote:I don't understand the point you're trying to make. Are you saying that they had terrible information thousands of years ago and that's what the bible is based on? Doesn't that just give you even less reason behind taking it as fact?
    The Bible's lessons are timeless, hence why millions still believe in its truth to this day.
    Millions of people believe in the bible because they were indoctrinated and never learned any different. If you could go back in time and replace the bible with something else, give it the same backing and force it upon other cultures, you would still have millions of people believing in it thousands of years later.
    avatar
    Zzonked
     
     

    Posts : 24277
    Age : 25

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Zzonked on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:43 am

    Sarmz wrote:
    MickStupp wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    Plenty of people are certain there is no god. You don't see people questioning their intelligence though.
    Like who? I would certainly challenge their beliefs, since they cannot prove definitively that there is no god. But the vast majority of atheists have a degree of agnosticism.

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.

    I seriously doubt that RR falls into that category.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:44 am

    Sarmz wrote:
    MickStupp wrote:
    Like who? I would certainly challenge their beliefs, since they cannot prove definitively that there is no god. But the vast majority of atheists have a degree of agnosticism.

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.
    You say we can't prove God doesn't exist but can you prove he does?

    avatar
    SBSP
     
     

    Posts : 50005

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by SBSP on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:44 am

    Splashy wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.
    You say we can't prove God doesn't exist but can you prove he does?

    We never said we could prove that. Neutral
    avatar
    MickStupp
     
     

    Posts : 1933
    Age : 25
    Location : Glasgow

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by MickStupp on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:45 am

    Sarmz wrote:
    MickStupp wrote:
    Like who? I would certainly challenge their beliefs, since they cannot prove definitively that there is no god. But the vast majority of atheists have a degree of agnosticism.

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.
    I'm not sure about RR falling into that category. He just holds a more aggressive stance than most.
    avatar
    Zzonked
     
     

    Posts : 24277
    Age : 25

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Zzonked on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:45 am

    Sarmz wrote:
    Splashy wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    Surely it's equally irrational to be 100% certain that there is no god as well then?
    No because scientist's etc put forawrd evidence to support our non-belief.

    What has religion got, An ancient book? Neutral

    Science has not put forward any evidence to disprove god. It's put forward evidence to make a god unlikely but there is nothing out there that 100% proves there is no god.

    I agree with the principle. However it's not a good reason to suggest faith is a good idea.
    avatar
    SBSP
     
     

    Posts : 50005

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by SBSP on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:45 am

    Zzonked wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    Science has not put forward any evidence to disprove god. It's put forward evidence to make a god unlikely but there is nothing out there that 100% proves there is no god.

    I agree with the principle. However it's not a good reason to suggest faith is a good idea.
    Why not?
    avatar
    Jordi
    .
    .

    Posts : 36022
    Age : 22
    Supports : Saints

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Jordi on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:46 am

    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:46 am

    Splashy wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.
    You say we can't prove God doesn't exist but can you prove he does?


    No, but then I'm not the one going around question peoples intelligence based on their beliefs am I?
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:46 am

    Jordi wrote:

    Fucks sake I was going to use that Mad
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:47 am

    MickStupp wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:

    There are several theories out there as to how the universe was created the way it was. Some people believe that God was responsible. Others might think we are one in an infinite numbers of universes. Others have different theories. I find holes in other all the theories for the creation of the universe (that I have heard of so far) and so the God theory makes the most sense to me.

    The belief in a God requires as much faith as the belief in the multiverse theory for example. You can't prove or disprove the multiverse theory, just as you can't prove or disprove God. Yet there seems to be a double standard. People who believe in a God are treated like crazy people, while people who hold the multiverse theory aren't.
    But that's when you have to take into account the difference between theism and deism. You can't disprove deism, but you can find holes in theistic theories.

    Fair enough. Maybe there is a God out there but all the current religions are just false. Or maybe there is only one true religion out there.

    Splashy wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    From what I've seen Dan, Splashy and RR would fall into that category.
    You say we can't prove God doesn't exist but can you prove he does?


    No and nobody claims to have 100% proof of God's existence.
    avatar
    Zzonked
     
     

    Posts : 24277
    Age : 25

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Zzonked on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:48 am

    SBSP wrote:
    Zzonked wrote:
    Sarmz wrote:

    Science has not put forward any evidence to disprove god. It's put forward evidence to make a god unlikely but there is nothing out there that 100% proves there is no god.

    I agree with the principle. However it's not a good reason to suggest faith is a good idea.
    Why not?

    Because there's no evidence to disprove a whole multitude of things. Just because it's not definitely untrue doesn't mean it's true. Flying spaghetti monster territory here.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:49 am

    Everything in this world is based on belief. I have never seen my kidneys, but does that mean I am lacking in that department? think
    avatar
    Jordi
    .
    .

    Posts : 36022
    Age : 22
    Supports : Saints

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Jordi on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:50 am

    InGlennyWeTrust wrote:Everything in this world is based on belief. I have never seen my kidneys, but does that mean I am lacking in that department? think
    No, because there is scientific proof that they exist.
    avatar
    MickStupp
     
     

    Posts : 1933
    Age : 25
    Location : Glasgow

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by MickStupp on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:50 am

    InGlennyWeTrust wrote:Everything in this world is based on belief. I have never seen my kidneys, but does that mean I am lacking in that department? think
    I could show you them if you give me your address.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:50 am

    Sarmz wrote:
    Splashy wrote:
    You say we can't prove God doesn't exist but can you prove he does?


    No, but then I'm not the one going around question peoples intelligence based on their beliefs am I?
    Well why are you in the Athiest thread then?
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:50 am

    InGlennyWeTrust wrote:Everything in this world is based on belief. I have never seen my kidneys, but does that mean I am lacking in that department? think

    Not exactly the best example to use there.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:51 am

    Jordi wrote:
    InGlennyWeTrust wrote:Everything in this world is based on belief. I have never seen my kidneys, but does that mean I am lacking in that department?
    No, because there is scientific proof that they exist.
    But I have not yet seen my livers? And any pictures from scans they run could easily be photoshopped think
    avatar
    Zzonked
     
     

    Posts : 24277
    Age : 25

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Zzonked on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:51 am

    ahlycotc wrote:
    MickStupp wrote:
    ahlycotc wrote:

    There are several theories out there as to how the universe was created the way it was. Some people believe that God was responsible. Others might think we are one in an infinite numbers of universes. Others have different theories. I find holes in other all the theories for the creation of the universe (that I have heard of so far) and so the God theory makes the most sense to me.

    The belief in a God requires as much faith as the belief in the multiverse theory for example. You can't prove or disprove the multiverse theory, just as you can't prove or disprove God. Yet there seems to be a double standard. People who believe in a God are treated like crazy people, while people who hold the multiverse theory aren't.
    But that's when you have to take into account the difference between theism and deism. You can't disprove deism, but you can find holes in theistic theories.

    Fair enough. Maybe there is a God out there but all the current religions are just false. Or maybe there is only one true religion out there.

    Yeah that's the logical stance to take, if you understand that, do you just believe because of Pascals Wager?
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:51 am

    If this thread has no point, neither does the Man United, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool threads.

    Also those internet memes are not there to bash religion. They are there to discuss points of why we don't believe in god.

    Also there is lots of discussion to be had over religion. To begin, In Science, you have to observe, theorize, test, then modify hypothesis until you get the result. The problem with History is that you cannot test a hypothesis, you cannot simply make a model earth and test things, but there is one thing you can use for testing - our planet and all it's history and people. Thus makes way for why I find religion a very interesting subject. It is so because it is interesting to study how the environment shaped peoples beliefs in a time before the scientific method and modern science, and in turn, how those same beliefs influenced peoples decision making when the very same environment changed over time. Religion is also much like language and the human race, always evolving.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:52 am

    Jordi wrote:
    InGlennyWeTrust wrote:Everything in this world is based on belief. I have never seen my kidneys, but does that mean I am lacking in that department?
    No, because there is scientific proof that they exist.
    I have never seen said scientists run these tests.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:52 am

    Zzonked wrote:
    SBSP wrote:Why not?

    Because there's no evidence to disprove a whole multitude of things. Just because it's not definitely untrue doesn't mean it's true. Flying spaghetti monster territory here.

    Yet people who believe in a god are treated differently?

    I often compare religious people to people who believe in alien life. We can't currently prove or disprove alien intelligent life.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:52 am

    InGlennyWeTrust wrote:
    Jordi wrote:No, because there is scientific proof that they exist.
    But I have not yet seen my livers? And any pictures from scans they run could easily be photoshopped think
    Now you're just being even more retarded.


    Last edited by Splashy on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:54 am; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Guest on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:53 am

    Pascal's Wager is grossly misinterpreted.

    Sponsored content

    Re: The Atheist Thread

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Nov 23, 2017 3:33 am